BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) as an early imaging indicator of tumor histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy and as a possible prognostic factor for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed, nonmetastatic osteosarcoma who were treated on a single, multi-institutional phase 2 trial. METHODS: Three serial DCE-MRI examinations at week 0 (before treatment), week 9, and week 12 (tumor resection) were performed in 69 patients with nonmetastatic osteosarcoma to monitor the response to preoperative chemotherapy. Four DCE-MRI kinetic parameters (the influx volume transfer constant [K(trans) ], the efflux rate constant [k(ep) ], the relative extravascular extracellular space [v(e) ], and the relative vascular plasma space [v(p) ]) and the corresponding differences (ΔK(trans) , Δk(ep) , Δv(e) , and Δv(p) ) of averaged kinetic parameters between the outer and inner halves of tumors were calculated to assess their associations with tumor histologic response, EFS, and overall survival. RESULTS: The parameters K(trans) , v(e) , v(p) , and k(ep) decreased significantly from week 0 to week 9 and week 12. The parameters K(trans) , v(p) , and Δk(ep) at week 9 were significantly different between responders and nonresponders (P = .046, P = .021, and P = .008, respectively). These 3 parameters were indicative of histologic response. The parameter Δv(e) at week 0 was a significant prognostic factor for both EFS (P = .02) and overall survival (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: DCE-MRI was identified as a prognostic factor for EFS and overall survival before treatment on this trial and was indicative of a histologic response to neoadjuvant therapy. Further studies are needed to verify these findings with other treatment regimens and establish the potential role of DCE-MRI in the development of risk-adapted therapy for osteosarcoma.
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) as an early imaging indicator of tumor histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy and as a possible prognostic factor for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed, nonmetastatic osteosarcoma who were treated on a single, multi-institutional phase 2 trial. METHODS: Three serial DCE-MRI examinations at week 0 (before treatment), week 9, and week 12 (tumor resection) were performed in 69 patients with nonmetastatic osteosarcoma to monitor the response to preoperative chemotherapy. Four DCE-MRI kinetic parameters (the influx volume transfer constant [K(trans) ], the efflux rate constant [k(ep) ], the relative extravascular extracellular space [v(e) ], and the relative vascular plasma space [v(p) ]) and the corresponding differences (ΔK(trans) , Δk(ep) , Δv(e) , and Δv(p) ) of averaged kinetic parameters between the outer and inner halves of tumors were calculated to assess their associations with tumor histologic response, EFS, and overall survival. RESULTS: The parameters K(trans) , v(e) , v(p) , and k(ep) decreased significantly from week 0 to week 9 and week 12. The parameters K(trans) , v(p) , and Δk(ep) at week 9 were significantly different between responders and nonresponders (P = .046, P = .021, and P = .008, respectively). These 3 parameters were indicative of histologic response. The parameter Δv(e) at week 0 was a significant prognostic factor for both EFS (P = .02) and overall survival (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS:DCE-MRI was identified as a prognostic factor for EFS and overall survival before treatment on this trial and was indicative of a histologic response to neoadjuvant therapy. Further studies are needed to verify these findings with other treatment regimens and establish the potential role of DCE-MRI in the development of risk-adapted therapy for osteosarcoma.
Authors: T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; I Ikushima; Y Shigematu; T Hirai; T Okuda; L Liang; Y Ge; Y Komohara; Y Ushio; M Takahashi Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: K Kono; Y Inoue; K Nakayama; M Shakudo; M Morino; K Ohata; K Wakasa; R Yamada Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2001 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: W E Reddick; S Wang; X Xiong; J O Glass; S Wu; S C Kaste; C B Pratt; W H Meyer; B D Fletcher Journal: Cancer Date: 2001-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: G Bacci; S Ferrari; A Longhi; S Perin; C Forni; N Fabbri; N Salduca; M Versari; K V Smith Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Allen M Goorin; Douglas J Schwartzentruber; Meenakshi Devidas; Mark C Gebhardt; Alberto G Ayala; Michael B Harris; Lee J Helman; Holcombe E Grier; Michael P Link Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stephanie L Barnes; Anna G Sorace; Mary E Loveless; Jennifer G Whisenant; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2015-08-30 Impact factor: 4.044