Literature DB >> 25499150

Genetic and epigenetic pathways in myelodysplastic syndromes: A brief overview.

Suresh C Jhanwar1.   

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a highly heterogenous group of hematopoietic tumors, mainly due to variable clinical features and diverse set of cytogenetic, molecular genetic and epigenetic lesions. The major clinical features of MDS are ineffective hematopoiesis, peripheral cytopenias, and an increased risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemias, which in turn is most likely determined by specific genetic abnormalities and other presenting hematologic features. The risk of developing MDS is relatively higher in some genetic syndromes such as Fanconi anemia and receipt of chemotherapy and radiation treatment. In recent years a significant progress has occurred and a vast literatures has become available including the spectrum of cytogenetic abnormalities, gene mutations relating to RNA splicing machinery, epigenetic regulation of gene expression and signaling pathways associated with MDS pathogenesis, which have provided opportunities to understand the molecular mechanisms as well as employ targeted therapeutic approaches to treat MDS. The cytogenetic abnormalities detected in MDS varies from a single abnormality to complex karyotype not easily amenable to conventional cytogenetic analysis. In such cases, array based high resolution genomic analysis detected abnormalities, which are diagnostic as well as prognostic. The most common driver gene mutations detected in patients with MDS include RNA splicing (SF3B1,SRSF2,U2F1,ZRSR2), DNA methylation (TET2,DNMT3A,IDH1/IDH2), chromatin modification (ASXL1,EZH2), transcription regulation (RUNX1,BCOR) and DNA repair control p53. A small subset of MDS arise due to deregulation of RAS pathway, mainly due to NRAS/KRAS/NF1 mutations. Identification of these mutations and pathways have provided opportunities for oncologists to target these patients with specific therapies. Several drugs which either target the spliceosome, oncogenic RAS signaling, or hypomethylating agents have been employed to successfully treat MDS patients.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytogenetics; Epigenetics; Gene Mutations; Genomic profiling; MDS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25499150     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbior.2014.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Biol Regul        ISSN: 2212-4926


  11 in total

1.  Panel sequencing of 264 candidate susceptibility genes and segregation analysis in a cohort of non-BRCA1, non-BRCA2 breast cancer families.

Authors:  Jun Li; Hongyan Li; Igor Makunin; Bryony A Thompson; Kayoko Tao; Erin L Young; Jacqueline Lopez; Nicola J Camp; Sean V Tavtigian; Esther M John; Irene L Andrulis; Kum Kum Khanna; David Goldgar; Georgia Chenevix-Trench
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Nuclear phospholipase C isoenzyme imbalance leads to pathologies in brain, hematologic, neuromuscular, and fertility disorders.

Authors:  Stefano Ratti; Matilde Y Follo; Giulia Ramazzotti; Irene Faenza; Roberta Fiume; Pann-Ghill Suh; James A McCubrey; Lucia Manzoli; Lucio Cocco
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 5.922

Review 3.  Biology of the bone marrow microenvironment and myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Erinn B Rankin; Anupama Narla; Joseph K Park; Shuo Lin; Kathleen M Sakamoto
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 4.797

4.  Hypermethylation of the VTRNA1-3 Promoter is Associated with Poor Outcome in Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients.

Authors:  Alexandra Søgaard Helbo; Marianne Treppendahl; Derya Aslan; Konstantinos Dimopoulos; Cecilie Nandrup-Bus; Mette Skov Holm; Mette Klarskov Andersen; Gangning Liang; Lasse Sommer Kristensen; Kirsten Grønbæk
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Presence of new mutations in the TP53 gene in patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: two case reports.

Authors:  Fernando Barroso Duarte; Romélia Pinheiro Gonçalves Lemes; Talyta Ellen de Jesus Dos Santos; Maritza Cavalcante Barbosa; João Paulo Leitão de Vasconcelos; Francisco Dário Rocha-Filho; Ilana Zalcberg; Diego Coutinho; Monalisa Feliciano Figueiredo; Luciana Barros Carlos; Paulo Roberto Leitão de Vasconcelos
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2017-05-21

Review 6.  The Krebs Cycle Connection: Reciprocal Influence Between Alternative Splicing Programs and Cell Metabolism.

Authors:  Giuseppe Biamonti; Lucia Maita; Alessandra Montecucco
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Affinity Purification of NF1 Protein-Protein Interactors Identifies Keratins and Neurofibromin Itself as Binding Partners.

Authors:  Rachel M Carnes; Robert A Kesterson; Bruce R Korf; James A Mobley; Deeann Wallis
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 8.  Targeting binding partners of the CBFβ-SMMHC fusion protein for the treatment of inversion 16 acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Lisa Richter; Yiqian Wang; R Katherine Hyde
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-04

9.  Interaction between Herpes Virus Infections and IL10 and Risk of Bone Marrow Suppression.

Authors:  R Yaghobi; F Alizadeh; A Khodavandi
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2018-08-01

10.  Aberrant Expression of EZH2 in Pediatric Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Potential Biomarker of Leukemic Evolution.

Authors:  Teresa de Souza Fernandez; Tatiana Fonseca Alvarenga; Elaiza Almeida Antônio de Kós; Viviane Lamim Lovatel; Rita de Cássia Tavares; Elaine Sobral da Costa; Cecília de Souza Fernandez; Eliana Abdelhay
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.