Literature DB >> 25498781

Capitalizing on prescribing pattern variation to compare medications for type 2 diabetes.

Julia C Prentice1, Paul R Conlin2, Walid F Gellad3, David Edelman4, Todd A Lee5, Steven D Pizer6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials often compare hypoglycemic medications on the basis of glycemic control but do not examine long-term outcomes (e.g., mortality). This study demonstrates an alternative approach to lengthening clinical trials to assess these long-term outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To use observational quasi-experimental methods using instrumental variables (IVs) to compare the effect of two hypoglycemic medications, sulfonylureas (SUs) and thiazolidinediones (TZDs), on long-term outcomes.
METHODS: This study used administrative data from the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare from 2000 to 2010. The study population included US veterans dually enrolled in Medicare who received a prescription for metformin and then initiated SUs or TZDs. Patients could either continue on or discontinue metformin after the initiation of the second agent. Treatment was defined as starting either a SU or a TZD. Local variations in SU prescribing rates were used as instruments in IV models to control for selection bias. Survival models predicted all-cause mortality, ambulatory care sensitive condition hospitalizations, and stroke or heart attack (acute myocardial infarction).
RESULTS: Starting on SUs compared to TZDs significantly increased the likelihood of experiencing mortality and ACSC hospitalization. The estimated hazard ratio for the effect of starting on SUs compared to TZDs was 1.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-2.09) for all-cause mortality, 1.68 (95% CI 1.31-2.15) for ambulatory care sensitive condition hospitalization, and 1.15 (95% CI 0.80-1.66) for acute myocardial infarction or stroke.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest increased risk of major adverse events associated with SUs as a second-line agent. Quasi-experimental IV methods may be an important alternative to lengthening clinical trials to assess long-term outcomes.
Copyright © 2014 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comparative effectiveness research; instrumental variables; provider-prescribing variation; type 2 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25498781     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.2674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  8 in total

1.  Falsification Testing of Instrumental Variables Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research.

Authors:  Steven D Pizer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Big Data Science: Opportunities and Challenges to Address Minority Health and Health Disparities in the 21st Century.

Authors:  Xinzhi Zhang; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Philip E Bourne; Emmanuel Peprah; O Kenrik Duru; Nancy Breen; David Berrigan; Fred Wood; James S Jackson; David W S Wong; Joshua Denny
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 1.847

3.  Capsule Commentary on Min et al., Comparative Effectiveness of Insulin versus Combination Sulfonylurea and Insulin: a Cohort Study of Veterans with Type 2 Diabetes: How to Escalate Therapy for Patients who Fail Sulfonylureas.

Authors:  Ranee Chatterjee; David Edelman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Identifying the independent effect of HbA1c variability on adverse health outcomes in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  J C Prentice; S D Pizer; P R Conlin
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 5.  Consensus Recommendations on Sulfonylurea and Sulfonylurea Combinations in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - International Task Force.

Authors:  Sanjay Kalra; Silver Bahendeka; Rakesh Sahay; Sujoy Ghosh; Fariduddin Md; Abbas Orabi; Kaushik Ramaiya; Sameer Al Shammari; Dina Shrestha; Khalid Shaikh; Sachitha Abhayaratna; Pradeep K Shrestha; Aravinthan Mahalingam; Mazen Askheta; Aly Ahmed A Rahim; Fatimah Eliana; Hari K Shrestha; Sandeep Chaudhary; Nancy Ngugi; Jean Claude Mbanya; Than Than Aye; Tint Swe Latt; Zhanay A Akanov; Abbas Raza Syed; Nikhil Tandon; A G Unnikrishnan; S V Madhu; Ali Jawa; Subhankar Chowdhury; Sarita Bajaj; Ashok Kumar Das
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

6.  The promise and perils of big data in healthcare.

Authors:  Austin B Frakt; Steven D Pizer
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.247

7.  Increased Hemoglobin A1c Time in Range Reduces Adverse Health Outcomes in Older Adults With Diabetes.

Authors:  Julia C Prentice; David C Mohr; Libin Zhang; Donglin Li; Aaron Legler; Richard E Nelson; Paul R Conlin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 17.152

Review 8.  Observational research on sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors: A real breakthrough?

Authors:  Emanuel Raschi; Elisabetta Poluzzi; Gian Paolo Fadini; Giulio Marchesini; Fabrizio De Ponti
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 6.577

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.