J C Prentice1,2, S D Pizer1,3, P R Conlin1,4. 1. VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: To characterize the relationship between HbA1c variability and adverse health outcomes among US military veterans with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used Veterans Affairs and Medicare claims for veterans with Type 2 diabetes taking metformin who initiated a second diabetes medication (n = 50 861). The main exposure of interest was HbA1c variability during a 3-year baseline period. HbA1c variability, categorized into quartiles, was defined as standard deviation, coefficient of variation and adjusted standard deviation, which accounted for the number and mean number of days between HbA1c tests. Cox proportional hazard models predicted mortality, hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, and myocardial infarction or stroke and were controlled for mean HbA1c levels and the direction of change in HbA1c levels during the baseline period. RESULTS: Over a mean 3.3 years of follow-up, all HbA1c variability measures significantly predicted each outcome. Using the adjusted standard deviation measure for HbA1c variability, the hazard ratios for the third and fourth quartile predicting mortality were 1.14 (95% CI 1.04, 1.25) and 1.42 (95% CI 1.28, 1.58), for myocardial infarction and stroke they were 1.25 (95% CI 1.10, 1.41) and 1.23 (95% CI 1.07, 1.42) and for ambulatory-care sensitive condition hospitalization they were 1.10 (95% CI 1.03, 1.18) and 1.11 (95% CI 1.03, 1.20). Higher baseline HbA1c levels independently predicted the likelihood of each outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In veterans with Type 2 diabetes, greater HbA1c variability was associated with an increased risk of adverse long-term outcomes, independently of HbA1c levels and direction of change. Limiting HbA1c fluctuations over time may reduce complications.
AIMS: To characterize the relationship between HbA1c variability and adverse health outcomes among US military veterans with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used Veterans Affairs and Medicare claims for veterans with Type 2 diabetes taking metformin who initiated a second diabetes medication (n = 50 861). The main exposure of interest was HbA1c variability during a 3-year baseline period. HbA1c variability, categorized into quartiles, was defined as standard deviation, coefficient of variation and adjusted standard deviation, which accounted for the number and mean number of days between HbA1c tests. Cox proportional hazard models predicted mortality, hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, and myocardial infarction or stroke and were controlled for mean HbA1c levels and the direction of change in HbA1c levels during the baseline period. RESULTS: Over a mean 3.3 years of follow-up, all HbA1c variability measures significantly predicted each outcome. Using the adjusted standard deviation measure for HbA1c variability, the hazard ratios for the third and fourth quartile predicting mortality were 1.14 (95% CI 1.04, 1.25) and 1.42 (95% CI 1.28, 1.58), for myocardial infarction and stroke they were 1.25 (95% CI 1.10, 1.41) and 1.23 (95% CI 1.07, 1.42) and for ambulatory-care sensitive condition hospitalization they were 1.10 (95% CI 1.03, 1.18) and 1.11 (95% CI 1.03, 1.20). Higher baseline HbA1c levels independently predicted the likelihood of each outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In veterans with Type 2 diabetes, greater HbA1c variability was associated with an increased risk of adverse long-term outcomes, independently of HbA1c levels and direction of change. Limiting HbA1c fluctuations over time may reduce complications.
Authors: Denise M Hynes; Kristin Koelling; Kevin Stroupe; Noreen Arnold; Katherine Mallin; Min-Woong Sohn; Frances M Weaver; Larry Manheim; Linda Kok Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Julia C Prentice; Paul R Conlin; Walid F Gellad; David Edelman; Todd A Lee; Steven D Pizer Journal: Value Health Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: William Duckworth; Carlos Abraira; Thomas Moritz; Domenic Reda; Nicholas Emanuele; Peter D Reaven; Franklin J Zieve; Jennifer Marks; Stephen N Davis; Rodney Hayward; Stuart R Warren; Steven Goldman; Madeline McCarren; Mary Ellen Vitek; William G Henderson; Grant D Huang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrea O Y Luk; Ronald C W Ma; Eric S H Lau; Xilin Yang; Winnie W Y Lau; Linda W L Yu; Francis C C Chow; Juliana C N Chan; Wing-Yee So Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 4.876
Authors: Yuka Kiyota; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Robert J Glynn; Carolyn C Cannuscio; Jerry Avorn; Daniel H Solomon Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Julia C Prentice; David C Mohr; Libin Zhang; Donglin Li; Aaron Legler; Richard E Nelson; Paul R Conlin Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2021-06-14 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Roderick C Slieker; Amber A W H van der Heijden; Giel Nijpels; Petra J M Elders; Leen M 't Hart; Joline W J Beulens Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 9.951