Joel Prince1, Eric Bultman1, Louis Hinshaw1, Anna Drewry1, Michael Blute1, Sara Best1, Fred T Lee1, Timothy Ziemlewicz1, Meghan Lubner1, Fangfang Shi1, Stephen Y Nakada1, E Jason Abel2. 1. Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Radiology (EB, LH, FTL, TZ, ML), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin. 2. Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Radiology (EB, LH, FTL, TZ, ML), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: abel@urology.wisc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Identification of patient and tumor characteristics associated with nondiagnostic biopsies is necessary to improve prebiopsy counseling and patient selection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical records and prebiopsy imaging of all patients treated with percutaneous biopsy for a renal mass 7 cm or less. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to examine the association between biopsy outcome and clinical/radiographic features. RESULTS: A total of 565 biopsies of renal tumors 7 cm or less in 525 patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference in age, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity score or gender between the patient cohorts with diagnostic and nondiagnostic biopsy. In 83 of 565 patients (14.7%) overall and in 72 of the 413 (17.4%) with a mass of 4 cm or less the biopsy findings were nondiagnostic. Overall 14.7% of masses were cystic and 85.3% were solid with a median tumor size of 2.75 cm (IQR 2.05-4.25). Independent predictors of nondiagnostic biopsy included cystic features, enhancement less than 20 HU, left tumor, tumor diameter and skin-to-tumor distance. The nondiagnostic rate of repeat biopsies was 20.8%, which did not statistically differ from the nondiagnostic rate at the initial renal mass biopsy attempt. Radiologist or pathologist experience was not associated with the biopsy nondiagnostic rate. In 7 of 565 patients (1.2%) hospital admission was required for adverse events after biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Nondiagnostic renal mass biopsies are more common in cystic, nonenhancing, small masses when patients have a skin-to-tumor distance of 13 cm or greater. Excluding patients with these criteria decreased the nondiagnostic rate from 14.7% to 8.7%.
PURPOSE: Identification of patient and tumor characteristics associated with nondiagnostic biopsies is necessary to improve prebiopsy counseling and patient selection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical records and prebiopsy imaging of all patients treated with percutaneous biopsy for a renal mass 7 cm or less. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to examine the association between biopsy outcome and clinical/radiographic features. RESULTS: A total of 565 biopsies of renal tumors 7 cm or less in 525 patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference in age, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity score or gender between the patient cohorts with diagnostic and nondiagnostic biopsy. In 83 of 565 patients (14.7%) overall and in 72 of the 413 (17.4%) with a mass of 4 cm or less the biopsy findings were nondiagnostic. Overall 14.7% of masses were cystic and 85.3% were solid with a median tumor size of 2.75 cm (IQR 2.05-4.25). Independent predictors of nondiagnostic biopsy included cystic features, enhancement less than 20 HU, left tumor, tumor diameter and skin-to-tumor distance. The nondiagnostic rate of repeat biopsies was 20.8%, which did not statistically differ from the nondiagnostic rate at the initial renal mass biopsy attempt. Radiologist or pathologist experience was not associated with the biopsy nondiagnostic rate. In 7 of 565 patients (1.2%) hospital admission was required for adverse events after biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Nondiagnostic renal mass biopsies are more common in cystic, nonenhancing, small masses when patients have a skin-to-tumor distance of 13 cm or greater. Excluding patients with these criteria decreased the nondiagnostic rate from 14.7% to 8.7%.
Authors: Pari V Pandharipande; Debra A Gervais; Rebecca I Hartman; Mukesh G Harisinghani; Adam S Feldman; Peter R Mueller; G Scott Gazelle Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Brian R Lane; Mary K Samplaski; Brian R Herts; Ming Zhou; Andrew C Novick; Steven C Campbell Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-11-13 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Michael J Leveridge; Antonio Finelli; John R Kachura; Andrew Evans; Hannah Chung; Daniel A Shiff; Kimberly Fernandes; Michael A S Jewett Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: John M Hollingsworth; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; Brent K Hollenbeck Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-09-20 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Alessandro Volpe; Antonio Finelli; Inderbir S Gill; Michael A S Jewett; Guido Martignoni; Thomas J Polascik; Mesut Remzi; Robert G Uzzo Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2012-05-12 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: John T Leppert; Janet Hanley; Todd H Wagner; Benjamin I Chung; Sandy Srinivas; Glenn M Chertow; James D Brooks; Christopher S Saigal Journal: Urology Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Hiten D Patel; Michael H Johnson; Phillip M Pierorazio; Stephen M Sozio; Ritu Sharma; Emmanuel Iyoha; Eric B Bass; Mohamad E Allaf Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Andrew W Silagy; Alejandro Sanchez; Brandon J Manley; Karim Bensalah; Axel Bex; Jose A Karam; Börje Ljungberg; Brian Shuch; A Ari Hakimi Journal: Eur Urol Focus Date: 2019-04-28
Authors: Alaina Garbens; Christopher J D Wallis; Zachary Klaassen; Refik Saskin; Lesley Plumptre; Ronald Kodama; Sender Herschorn; Robert K Nam Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 1.862