Literature DB >> 22633318

Rationale for percutaneous biopsy and histologic characterisation of renal tumours.

Alessandro Volpe1, Antonio Finelli, Inderbir S Gill, Michael A S Jewett, Guido Martignoni, Thomas J Polascik, Mesut Remzi, Robert G Uzzo.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The use of percutaneous biopsy of renal tumours has been traditionally reserved for selected cases because of uncertainties regarding its safety, accuracy, and clinical utility. With the adoption of modern biopsy techniques and increasing expertise in interpreting biopsy specimens, renal tumour biopsy today has limited morbidity and allows histologic diagnosis in the majority of cases in centres with expertise.
OBJECTIVE: To review the current rationale, indications, and outcomes of percutaneous biopsies and histologic characterisation of renal tumours. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a systematic review of English-language articles on percutaneous biopsies of renal tumours published between January 1999 and December 2011 using the Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. One hundred twelve articles were selected with the consensus of all authors and analysed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) criteria. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: In recent years, the increasing incidence of incidental small renal masses (SRMs), the development of conservative and minimally invasive treatments for low-risk renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and the discovery of novel targeted treatments for metastatic disease have provided the rationale for expanding the indications for renal tumour biopsy. Percutaneous biopsy for diagnostic assessment of SRMs can avoid unnecessary surgeries and support treatment decisions, especially in patients at high surgical risk. Biopsies can confirm histologic success after thermal ablation of SRMs and support the selection of the appropriate systemic therapy for metastatic RCC. There is increasing evidence that further diagnostic and prognostic information can be obtained from renal tumour biopsies with the use of immunohistochemistry, cytogenetic and molecular analysis, and high-throughput gene expression profiling.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous biopsies have increasing indications and can significantly contribute to clinical management of renal tumours but are still underutilised in clinical practice. Further research is needed to define optimal and standardised patterns of biopsy and improve the accuracy of biopsies to determine tumour histology. Molecular and genetic analysis of biopsy specimens can provide additional information to support patient counselling and treatment decision making.
Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22633318     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  56 in total

1.  CT fluoroscopy-guided renal tumour cutting needle biopsy: retrospective evaluation of diagnostic yield, safety, and risk factors for diagnostic failure.

Authors:  Toshihiro Iguchi; Takao Hiraki; Yusuke Matsui; Hiroyasu Fujiwara; Jun Sakurai; Yoshihisa Masaoka; Hideo Gobara; Susumu Kanazawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Active Surveillance for Small Renal Masses: A Review of the Aims and Preliminary Results of the DISSRM Registry.

Authors:  Matthew R Danzig; Peter Chang; Andrew A Wagner; Mohamad E Allaf; James M McKiernan; Phillip M Pierorazio
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Alternate Metabolic Programs Define Regional Variation of Relevant Biological Features in Renal Cell Carcinoma Progression.

Authors:  Samira A Brooks; Amir H Khandani; Julia R Fielding; Weili Lin; Tiffany Sills; Yueh Lee; Alexandra Arreola; Mathew I Milowsky; Eric M Wallen; Michael E Woods; Angie B Smith; Mathew E Nielsen; Joel S Parker; David S Lalush; W Kimryn Rathmell
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  The role of renal biopsy in small renal masses.

Authors:  Rodolfo Burruni; Benoit Lhermitte; Yannick Cerantola; Thomas Tawadros; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Dominik Berthold; Patrice Jichlinski; Massimo Valerio
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Identifying the use and barriers to the adoption of renal tumour biopsy in the management of small renal masses.

Authors:  Patrick O Richard; Lisa Martin; Luke T Lavallée; Philippe D Violette; Maria Komisarenko; Andrew J Evans; Kunal Jain; Michael A S Jewett; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Identification and Validation of Radiographic Enhancement for Reliable Differentiation of CD117(+) Benign Renal Oncocytoma and Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jay Amin; Bo Xu; Shervin Badkhshan; Terrance T Creighton; Daniel Abbotoy; Christine Murekeyisoni; Kristopher M Attwood; Thomas Schwaab; Craig Hendler; Michael Petroziello; Charles L Roche; Eric C Kauffman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Utilization of renal mass biopsy in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  John T Leppert; Janet Hanley; Todd H Wagner; Benjamin I Chung; Sandy Srinivas; Glenn M Chertow; James D Brooks; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Preoperative predictors of malignancy and unfavorable pathology for clinical T1a tumors treated with partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Mark W Ball; Michael A Gorin; Sam B Bhayani; Craig G Rogers; Michael D Stifelman; Jihad H Kaouk; Homayoun Zargar; Susan Marshall; Jeffrey A Larson; Haider M Rahbar; Bruce J Trock; Phillip M Pierorazio; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  Patient and tumor characteristics can predict nondiagnostic renal mass biopsy findings.

Authors:  Joel Prince; Eric Bultman; Louis Hinshaw; Anna Drewry; Michael Blute; Sara Best; Fred T Lee; Timothy Ziemlewicz; Meghan Lubner; Fangfang Shi; Stephen Y Nakada; E Jason Abel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Evaluation, diagnosis and surveillance of renal masses in the setting of VHL disease.

Authors:  Jad Chahoud; Melissa McGettigan; Nainesh Parikh; Ronald S Boris; Othon Iliopoulos; W Kimryn Rathmell; Anthony B Daniels; Eric Jonasch; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.