Literature DB >> 16040900

How I do it: evaluating renal masses.

Gary M Israel1, Morton A Bosniak.   

Abstract

With modern computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging equipment, the diagnosis of most renal masses is usually straightforward and accurate. The major question to be answered is whether the mass represents a surgical or nonsurgical lesion or, in some cases, if follow-up studies are necessary. This evaluation usually can be accomplished if a high-quality examination is performed, if the clinical history of the patient is kept in mind, if conditions that mimic a renal neoplasm are considered and excluded, and if there is an awareness of the potential pitfalls and limitations of CT and MR imaging. In this article, the authors present their technique in the performance of CT and MR imaging examinations, summarize their approach to the diagnosis of renal masses, review the imaging findings in these lesions, and stress the limitations in renal mass diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16040900     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2362040218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  76 in total

Review 1.  Dual-energy computed tomography applications in uroradiology.

Authors:  Jong Park; Hersh Chandarana; Michael Macari; Alec J Megibow
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Dual-energy CT with tin filter technology for the discrimination of renal lesion proxies containing blood, protein, and contrast-agent. An experimental phantom study.

Authors:  Christoph Karlo; Arno Lauber; Robert Paul Götti; Stephan Baumüller; Paul Stolzmann; Hans Scheffel; Lotus Desbiolles; Bernhard Schmidt; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Prospective comparison of use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the Bosniak classification of complex renal cysts.

Authors:  Matthew Ragel; Anbu Nedumaran; Jolanta Makowska-Webb
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2016-01-24

Review 4.  Dual energy CT: preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen.

Authors:  Anno Graser; Thorsten R C Johnson; Hersh Chandarana; Michael Macari
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Dual-energy CT iodine overlay technique for characterization of renal masses as cyst or solid: a phantom feasibility study.

Authors:  C L Brown; R P Hartman; O P Dzyubak; N Takahashi; A Kawashima; C H McCollough; M R Bruesewitz; A M Primak; J G Fletcher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Dual energy MDCT assessment of renal lesions: an overview.

Authors:  Achille Mileto; Daniele Marin; Rendon C Nelson; Giorgio Ascenti; Daniel T Boll
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Imaging renal cell carcinoma with ultrasonography, CT and MRI.

Authors:  Michael J Leveridge; Peter J Bostrom; George Koulouris; Antonio Finelli; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  Imaging of Solid Renal Masses.

Authors:  Fernando U Kay; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.241

9.  Patient and tumor characteristics can predict nondiagnostic renal mass biopsy findings.

Authors:  Joel Prince; Eric Bultman; Louis Hinshaw; Anna Drewry; Michael Blute; Sara Best; Fred T Lee; Timothy Ziemlewicz; Meghan Lubner; Fangfang Shi; Stephen Y Nakada; E Jason Abel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Unusual renal tumour: multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Marta Morna Palmeiro; João Luz Niza; Ana Luisa Loureiro; João Paulo Conceição e Silva
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.