Literature DB >> 21764371

Human biomonitoring assessment values: approaches and data requirements.

Jürgen Angerer1, Lesa L Aylward, Sean M Hays, Birger Heinzow, Michael Wilhelm.   

Abstract

Human biomonitoring (HBM) data is a very useful metric for assessing human's exposures to chemicals in commerce. To assess the potential health risks associated with the presence of chemicals in blood, urine or other biological matrix requires HBM assessment values. While HBM assessment values based on human exposure-response data remain the most highly valuable and interpretable assessment values, enough data exists for such values for very few chemicals. As a consequence, efforts have been undertaken to derive HBM assessment values in which external dose based guidance values such as tolerable daily intakes have been translated into equivalent biomonitoring levels. The development of HBM values by the German HBM Commission and Biomonitoring Equivalents by Summit Toxicology has resulted in conceptually similar assessment values. The review of the development of these values provided here demonstrates examples and approaches that can be used to broaden the range of chemicals for which such assessment values can be derived. Efforts to date have resulted in the publication of HBM assessment values for more than 80 chemicals, and now provide tools that can be used for the evaluation of HBM data across chemicals and populations.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21764371     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2011.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  23 in total

Review 1.  Pooled biological specimens for human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals: opportunities and limitations.

Authors:  Amy L Heffernan; Lesa L Aylward; Leisa-Maree L Toms; Peter D Sly; Matthew Macleod; Jochen F Mueller
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Pilot study testing a European human biomonitoring framework for biomarkers of chemical exposure in children and their mothers: experiences in the UK.

Authors:  Karen Exley; Dominique Aerts; Pierre Biot; Ludwine Casteleyn; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Gerda Schwedler; Argelia Castaño; Jürgen Angerer; Holger M Koch; Marta Esteban; Birgit K Schindler; Greet Schoeters; Elly Den Hond; Milena Horvat; Louis Bloemen; Lisbeth E Knudsen; Reinhard Joas; Anke Joas; Ovnair Sepai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Stochastic modeling of near-field exposure to parabens in personal care products.

Authors:  Susan A Csiszar; Alexi S Ernstoff; Peter Fantke; Olivier Jolliet
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  Distribution and health risk assessment to heavy metals near smelting and mining areas of Hezhang, China.

Authors:  Meryem Briki; Yi Zhu; Yang Gao; Mengmeng Shao; Huaijian Ding; Hongbing Ji
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Health Risk Assessment of Trace Metals Through Breast Milk Consumption in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Iman Al-Saleh
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Incorporating regulatory guideline values in analysis of epidemiology data.

Authors:  Chris Gennings; Huan Shu; Christina Rudén; Mattias Öberg; Christian Lindh; Hannu Kiviranta; Carl-Gustaf Bornehag
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  Chemical Mixtures in the EU Population: Composition and Potential Risks.

Authors:  Sebastian Socianu; Stephanie K Bopp; Eva Govarts; Liese Gilles; Jurgen Buekers; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Thomas Backhaus; Antonio Franco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  The effects of the phthalate DiNP on reproduction†.

Authors:  Shuhong Yang; Rachel Braz Arcanjo; Romana A Nowak
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  Evaluation of biomonitoring data from the CDC National Exposure Report in a risk assessment context: perspectives across chemicals.

Authors:  Lesa L Aylward; Christopher R Kirman; Rita Schoeny; Christopher J Portier; Sean M Hays
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Development of screening tools for the interpretation of chemical biomonitoring data.

Authors:  Richard A Becker; Sean M Hays; Steven Robison; Lesa L Aylward
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2012-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.