| Literature DB >> 32727498 |
Jana Becker1,2,3, Stephan Bose-O'Reilly4,5, Dennis Shoko6, Josephine Singo7, Nadine Steckling-Muschack4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) as a source of income is rapidly gaining importance in the economically difficult times in Zimbabwe. Besides limited epidemiological data, no data about the self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of artisanal and small-scale gold miners exist. The aim of the project was to access HRQoL of ASGM workers to improve the data base and compare the data to the urban Zimbabwean population.Entities:
Keywords: Artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM); EuroQol (EQ-5D + C-3 L); Health-related quality of life (HRQoL); Mercury; Mercury intoxication; Minamata convention on mercury
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32727498 PMCID: PMC7390189 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01475-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes ISSN: 1477-7525 Impact factor: 3.186
Self-reported health state of miners in mining areas in Kadoma (n = 83) and Fisher’s exact test for age group differences. Frequency of levels in each dimension are presented as percentages
| EQ-5D DIMENSIONS | AGE GROUPS | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15–24 | 25–34 | 35–44 | 45+ | ||||
| No Problems | 100 | 87.8 | 81.0 | 92.3 | |||
| Problems | 0.0 | 12.2 | 19.0 | 7.7 | 0.673 | ||
| Severe Problems | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| No Problems | 75.0 | 92.7 | 95.2 | 100 | |||
| Problems | 12.5 | 7.3 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 0.212 | ||
| Severe Problems | 12.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| No Problems | 75.0 | 87.8 | 85.7 | 100 | |||
| Problems | 25.0 | 12.2 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 0.329 | ||
| Severe Problems | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| No Problems | 87.5 | 85.4 | 71.4 | 61.5 | |||
| Problems | 12.5 | 12.2 | 28.6 | 30.8 | 0.309 | ||
| Severe Problems | 0.0 | 2.4 | 0.0 | 7.7 | |||
| No Problems | 87.5 | 78.0 | 71.4 | 69.2 | |||
| Problems | 12.5 | 17.1 | 28.6 | 23.1 | 0.792 | ||
| Severe Problems | 0.0 | 4.9 | 0.0 | 7.7 | |||
| No Problems | 62.5 | 72.2 | 71.4 | 69.3 | |||
| Problems | 25.0 | 19.5 | 19.0 | 30.8 | 0.878 | ||
| Severe Problems | 12.5 | 7.3 | 9.5 | 0.0 | |||
Paired Student’s t-test comparison of self-rated VAS values by miners in Kadoma with HU values based on the Zimbabwean tariff
| Mean (SD) | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.810 (0.17) | < 0.001* | |
| 0.896 (0.13) |
*p < 0.05
Univariate subgroup comparisons in the sample of artisanal and small-scale miners (n = 83) using Fisher’s exact test. Frequencies of reported problems are reported as absolute numbers and percentages
| N (%) | No problem N (%) | Problem with mobility | Problem with self-care N (%) | Problem with daily activities N (%) | Problem with pain/ discomfort N (%) | Problem with anxiety/ depression N (%) | Problem with cognition N (%) | Mean health utility (SD) | Mean VAS (SD) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83 (100) | 35 (42.2) | 10 (12.0) | 6 (7.2) | 10 (12.0) | 18 (21.7) | 20 (24.1) | 24 (28.9) | 0.896 (0.13) | 81.0 (17.5) | |
| Men | 69 (83.1) | 31 (44.9) | 6 (8.7) | 5 (7.2) | 8 (11.6) | 14 (20.3) | 17 (24.6) | 20 (29.0) | 0.898 (0.13) | 80.0 (18.0) |
| Women | 14 (16.9) | 4 (28.6) | 4 (28.6) | 1 (7.1) | 2 (14.3) | 4 (28.6) | 3 (21.4) | 4 (28.6) | 0.885 (0.12) | 86.1 (14.7) |
| 15–24 | 8 (9.6) | 4 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (25.0) | 2 (25.0) | 1 (12.5) | 1 (12.5) | 3 (37.5) | 0.885 (0.13) | 86.9 (17.1) |
| 25–34 | 41 (49.4) | 20 (48.8) | 5 (12.2) | 3 (7.3) | 5 (12.2) | 6 (14.6) | 9 (22.0) | 11 (26.8) | 0.908 (0.13) | 81.2 (19.4) |
| 35–44 | 21 (25.3) | 8 (31.1) | 4 (19.0) | 1 (4.8) | 3 (4.3) | 6 (28.6) | 6 (28.6) | 6 (28.6) | 0.894 (0.11) | 77.0 (14.2) |
| 44+ | 13 (15.7) | 3 (23.1) | 1 (7.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (38.5) | 4 (30.8) | 4 (30.5) | 0.866 (0.13) | 83.3 (16.0) |
| Primary | 21 (25.3) | 5 (23.8) | 4 (19.0) | 2 (9.5) | 6 (28.6) | 5 (23.8) | 9 (42.9) | 10 (47.6) | 0.844 (0.14) | 87.38 (17.4) |
| Secondary | 57 (68.7) | 27 (47.4) | 6 (10.5) | 4 (7.0) | 4 (7.0) | 12 (21.1) | 10 (17.5) | 14 (24.6) | 0.911 (0.12) | 78.86 (17.6) |
| Post-school | 5 (6.0) | 3 (60.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (20.0) | 1 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.937 (0.09) | 79.00 (9.6) |
| < = 5 Jahre | 45 (54.2) | 16 (42.1) | 6 (13.3) | 4 (8.9) | 6 (13.3) | 8 (17.8) | 9 (20.0) | 14 (31.1) | 0.897 (0.13) | 81.78 (17.9) |
| > 5 Jahre | 38 (45.8) | 19 (42.2) | 4 (10.5) | 2 (5.3) | 4 (10.5) | 10 (26.3) | 11 (28.9) | 10 (26.3) | 0.894 (0.12) | 80.13 (17.2) |
| No | 20 (24.1) | 11 (55.0) | 3 (15.0) | 1 (5.0) | 2 (10.0) | 3 (15.0) | 5 (25.0) | 5 (25.0) | 0.915 (0.12) | 76.90 (19.9) |
| Yes | 63 (75.9) | 24 (38.1) | 77 (11.1) | 5 (7.9) | 8 (12.7) | 15 (23.8) | 15 (23.8) | 19 (30.2) | 0.890 (0.13) | 82.33 (16.6) |
* p < 0.05
Self-reported health status of miners in Kadoma (n = 83) compared to subjects in urban Zimbabwe (n = 2183). Frequencies of levels in each dimension are reported as percentages
| Dimension | Mobility | Self-Care | Usual Activities | Pain/ Discomfort | Anxiety/ Depression | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miner | Citya | Miner | Citya | Miner | Citya | Miner | Citya | Miner | Citya | |
| 88.0 | 90.1 | 92.8 | 96.5 | 88.0 | 89.0 | 78.3 | 69.5 | 75.9 | 69.3 | |
| 12.0 | 9.7 | 6.0 | 3.4 | 12.0 | 10.5 | 19.3 | 26.3 | 20.5 | 23.9 | |
| 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 6.8 | |
a Compared to data from Jelsma et al. [37]
Unpaired Student’s t-test comparison of VAS values of miners to the urban population of Zimbabwe
| Visual analogue scale | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miners (SD) | City (SD) | Difference Miners - City | ||
| 81.0 (17.5) | 79.8 (19.4) | 1,2 | 0.526 | |
| Men | 80.0 (18.0) | 81.5 (18.0) | −1.5 | 0.490 |
| Women | 86.1 (14.7) | 78.7 (15.2) | 7.4 | 0.083 |
| 18–24 | 86.9 (17.1) | 81.8 (16.) | 5.1 | 0.449 |
| 25–34 | 81.2 (19.4) | 79.8 (16.6) | 1.4 | 0.642 |
| 35–44 | 77.0 (14.2) | 76.6 (19.5) | 0.4 | 0.898 |
| > 44 | 83.3 (16.0) | 69.0 (34.7) | 14.3 | |
* p < 0,05 * Compared to data from Szende et al. [40] & Jelsma et al. [37]
Fig. 1Scatterplot of self-perceived VAS values and HUs calculated with ZIM tariff