| Literature DB >> 25492847 |
Xueying Zhang1, Liman Wang2, Xiaoyang Xu3, Caiping Cai4, Wangzhen Guo5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades play a crucial role in plant growth and development as well as biotic and abiotic stress responses. Knowledge about the MAPK gene family in cotton is limited, and systematic investigation of MAPK family proteins has not been reported.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25492847 PMCID: PMC4270029 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-014-0345-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Figure 1Chromosomal distribution of MAPK genes in The chromosome numbers are indicated at the top of each bar. The chromosome numbers from D1 to D5, and D7 to D12 were consistent with our newly-updated interspecific genetic map in allotetraploid cultivated cotton species reported recently (Zhao et al. [32]), and the scaffolds name from G. raimindii genome was showed in the bracket. Lines were drawn to connect duplicated genes. The nomaclature of MAPKs were based on the order of the chromosomes in G. raimondii.
Figure 2Comparison of the amino acid sequences of GrMAPKs. Roman numerals indicate regions containing the 11 domains (I–XI) found in the cotton PK subdomains. The A-Loop, CD-domain and phosphorylation-activation motif (TEY and TDY) are indicated with red boxes.
Figure 3Intron and exon organization of MAPK genes ( ). Introns and exons are represented by black lines and colored boxes, respectively. GrMPKs were grouped according to phylogenetic classification. Phylogenetic analysis was done using the ML method with 1,000 resampling replicates. Bootstrap values (%) based on 1000 replicates are indicated beside the nodes.
Figure 4Phylogenetic relationships of MAPK family genes from , , , and Amino acid sequences were aligned using ClustalX software and subjected to phylogenetic analysis using the ML method with 1,000 resampling replicates. Bootstrap values (%) based on 1000 replicates are indicated beside the nodes. GrMAPKs are highlighted in red and the other MAPKs from A. thaliana, O. sativa and G. max are shown in different colors.
Figure 5Real-time qRT-PCR analysis of MAPK genes in different tissues and organs in acc. TM-1. A total of eight cotton tissues (root; stem; leaf; petal; anther; ovule at 0 day post anthesis (DPA); fiber at 10 DPA; and fiber at 21 DPA) were sampled to analyze. Differences in gene expression intensities are shown in colors indicated in the scale. Phylogenetic analysis was done using the ML method with 1,000 resampling replicates. Bootstrap values (%) based on 1000 replicates are indicated beside the nodes.
Figure 6Relative expression of MAPK genes under stress-related signal treatments. The data are presented in clusters using the fold-change (E/C) of relative expression for all MAPK genes in response to stress-siganl treatments (Experiment), in comparison to their respective controls (Control). Red and blue colors represent increased or decreased expression levels, respectively, in comparison to controls. The stress-related signals included JA, H2O2, ABA and SA, respectively.
Figure 7Relative expression of MAPK genes under different stress treatments. The data are presented in clusters using the fold-change (E/C) of relative expression for all MAPK genes in response to different treatments (Experiment), in comparison to their respective controls (Control). Red and blue colors represent increased or decreased expression levels, respectively, in comparison to controls. The stressors included NaCl, PEG, 4°C, 37°C, and wounding treatment, respectively.
Expression profiles of MAPK genes under different stress treatments in cotton
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Group B | ** | ** | D | D | ** | D | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group B | ** | ** | ** | D | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group B | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group B | ** | ** | - | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group B | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | D | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group A | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | - | ** | ** | * |
|
| Group A | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | D | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group A | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | D | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group A | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | D | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group C | ** | ** | ** | ** | - | - | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group C | ** | D | D | D | ** | ** | ** | ** | D |
|
| Group C | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group C | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group C | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group C | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group D | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group D | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | * | ** |
|
| Group D | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | - | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group D | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group D | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | ** | / | ** |
|
| Group D | ** | * | * | D | ** | D | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group D | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
|
| Group D | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | D | ** | ** | ** |
Note: For hormone treatments, the leaves of seedlings were harvested at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h after treatment;
For the environmental stress factor treatments, the leaves of seedlings were harvested at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h after treatment;
“**” and “*” indicate significant difference at P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively;
“-” represents no change and weak upregulation; “D” represents significant reduction in MAPK gene expression after treatment;
“/” represents absent data. The Student’s t-test was performed between treated samples and untreated samples.
Pearson correlation coefficients of the expression profiles of paralogous pairs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| 86.73% | 0.24 | 0.40 | 0.26 |
|
|
| 93.28% | −0.04 |
| 0.27 |
|
|
| 84.51% |
|
| 0.10 |
|
|
| 93.48% | 0.34 |
|
|
|
|
| 91.85% | 0.15 |
|
|
|
|
| 85.87% | −0.39 | 0.26 |
|
|
|
| 92.27% | −0.46 |
|
|
|
|
| 90.37% | −0.15 |
| −0.03 |
|
|
| 86.63% | 0.03 |
| −0.06 |
|
|
| 80.65% | −0.30 | 0.14 | 0.07 |
|
|
| 84.96% | −0.26 |
|
|
|
|
| 92.39% | −0.49 | 0.33 |
|
|
|
| 86.96% |
| −0.06 |
|
|
|
| 77.28% | −0.09 | −0.07 | 0.23 |
*Correlation coefficient: r > 0.5: positive correlation, showed in bold type; 0 < r < 0.5: no clear positive correlation; −0.5 < r < 0: no clear negative correlation; r < −0.5: negative correlation.
Figure 8Expression patterns of three MAPK genes induced by and VIGS analysis. (a) Q-PCR analysis of the expression of three MAPK genes after inoculation by V. dahliae. The error bars were calculated based on three biological replicates using standard deviation. “*”: significant difference (P < 0.05); “**”: significant difference (p < 0.01). (b) Phenotypes after TRV-VIGS silencing of three MAPK genes and GhCLA1. After two weeks post-treatment with TRV1 and TRV2/TRV2-MPKs, the treated plants exhibited normal growth. TRV1- and TRV-GhCLA1-treated plants exhibited a photobleaching phenotype. (c) Gene expression of MPK9, MPK13 and MPK25 in silenced and control plant leaves by Q-PCR analysis; The error bars were calculated based on three biological replicates using standard deviation. “*”: significant difference (P < 0.05); “**”: significant difference (p < 0.01). The cotton histone 3 (AF026714) was used as the reference gene.
Figure 9Silencing of , and enhances plant susceptibility to infection. Individual genes of the cotton cultivar Hai7124 were first silenced by VIGS, and the plants were then inoculated with V. dahliae suspension spores at a concentration of 1 × 107/mL. (a) Plant phenotypes at 28 days after V. dahlia inoculation. (b) Percentage of diseased leaves after V. dahlia inoculation. The percentage of diseased leaves was scored. The experiments were repeated using 15 plants per treatment. The error bars were calculated based on three biological replicates using standard deviation.