| Literature DB >> 23046547 |
Liang Zhao1, Lv Yuanda, Cai Caiping, Tong Xiangchao, Chen Xiangdong, Zhang Wei, Du Hao, Guo Xiuhua, Guo Wangzhen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cotton is the world's most important natural textile fiber and a significant oilseed crop. Decoding cotton genomes will provide the ultimate reference and resource for research and utilization of the species. Integration of high-density genetic maps with genomic sequence information will largely accelerate the process of whole-genome assembly in cotton.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23046547 PMCID: PMC3557173 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-539
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Comparison of marker types and loci between the previously published map and the updated genetic linkage map. Note: The InDel, SNP and REMAP markers are new to the updated map and are not included in the map of Guo et al. 2008.
Figure 2The newly-updated genetic map for A1/D1, A2/D2 and A3/D3 homoeologous pairs. Note: Genetic map was constructed using a BC1 population obtained from the interspecific cross: G. hirsutum L. acc. TM-1 × G. barbadense L. cv. Hai7124. Recombination distance is given in centimorgans (cM). Chromosomes and linkage groups are arranged by homoeologous pairs and their corresponding conventional chromosome numbers denoted in bracket. REMAP markers are shown in bold. Segregation distorted loci are underlined and italicized; loci skewed toward the heterozygote only are underlined, loci skewed toward TM-1 are both italicized and underlined. Segregation distortion regions (SDRs) are named as ‘No. SDR + linkage group’, for example, SDR1_2 refers to the first SDR (out of all SDRs) and is located on Chr. 2 linkage group.
Figure 3The newly-updated genetic map for A4/D4, A5/D5 and A6/D6 homoeologous pairs. All legends are same as described for Figure 2.
Figure 4The newly-updated genetic map for A7/D7 and A8/D8 homoeologous pairs. All legends are same as described for Figure 2.
Figure 5The newly-updated genetic map for A9/D9 and A10/D10 homoeologous pairs. All legends are same as described for Figure 2.
Figure 6The newly-updated genetic map for A11/D11 and A12/D12 homoeologous pairs. All legends are same as described for Figure 2.
Figure 7The newly-updated genetic map for A13/D13 homoeologous pairs. All legends are same as described for Figure 2.
Number and type of molecular marker loci that show segregation distortion in
| | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSR | eSSR | 1450 | 140 | 70 | 70 |
| gSSR | 1284 | 73 | 29 | 44 | |
| REMAP | 187 | 21 | 9 | 12 | |
| RT | 172 | 22 | 6 | 16 | |
| SRAP | 127 | 13 | 5 | 8 | |
| AFLP | 80 | 24 | 14 | 10 | |
| SNP | 73 | 4 | 3 | 1 | |
| CAPs | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| InDel | 12 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| BAC-end | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| morphology | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 3414 | 300 | 137 | 163 | |
Integration analysis of ESTs/genes with previously reported quantitative trait loci (QTL) related to fiber quality*
| A1(Chr.1) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| A2(Chr.2) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| A3(Chr.3) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| A4(Chr.4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| A5(Chr.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| A6(Chr.6) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| A7(Chr.7) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| A8(Chr.8) | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 40 |
| A9(Chr.9) | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 11 |
| A10(Chr.10) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| A11(Chr.11) | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 26 |
| A12(Chr.12) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| A13(Chr.13) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| D1(Chr.15) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| D2(Chr.14) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 |
| D3(Chr.17) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 28 |
| D4(Chr.22) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| D5(Chr.19) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 |
| D6(Chr.25) | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 11 |
| D7(Chr.16) | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 34 |
| D8(Chr.24) | 10 | 13 | 9 | 13 | 3 | 48 | 60 |
| D9(Chr.23) | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
| D10(Chr.20) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 11 |
| D11(Chr.21) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| D12(Chr.26) | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 10 |
| D13(Chr.18) | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 21 |
| 9 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 35 | 100 | |
| 20 | 21 | 23 | 23 | 10 | 97 | 237 | |
| 29 | 29 | 29 | 28 | 17 |
* The fiber quality traits mainly included fiber length (FL), fiber strength (FS), fiber fineness (FF), fiber elongation (FE), and fiber uniformity (FU). QTL related to fiber quality traits were reported previously from references [39-53].