Literature DB >> 25492126

Toll-like receptor 4 Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile polymorphisms: New data and a meta-analysis.

Nezha Senhaji1, Brehima Diakité2, Nadia Serbati3, Younes Zaid4, Wafaa Badre5, Sellama Nadifi6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) involves interactions between the host genetic susceptibility, intestinal microflora and mucosal immune responses through the pattern recognition receptor. Polymorphisms in toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) induce an aberrant immune response to indigenous intestinal flora, which might favor IBD development. In this study, we aimed to determine whether TLR4 gene was associated with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) among Moroccan patients, and evaluated its correlation with clinical manifestation of the disease.
METHODS: The study population comprised 117 patients with IBD and 112 healthy unrelated blood donors. TLR4 polymorphisms: Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. PCR products were cleaved with Nco I for the Asp299Gly polymorphism and Hinf I for the Thr399Ile polymorphism. Meta-analysis was performed to test the association of 299Gly and 399Ileu carriage with CD, UC and the overall IBD risk.
RESULTS: Our study revealed that the frequency of Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile did not differ significantly between patients and controls in the Moroccan population. However, meta-analysis demonstrated significantly higher frequencies of both Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile SNPs in IBD and CD and for 399Ileu carriage in UC patients.
CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis provides evidence that TLR4 polymorphisms confer a significant increased risk for the overall IBD development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25492126      PMCID: PMC4279599          DOI: 10.1186/s12876-014-0206-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1471-230X            Impact factor:   3.067


Background

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an idiopathic and chronic multifactorial disease of the gastrointestinal tract. Although the precise etiology of IBD is unclear, several factors that play a crucial role in disease pathogenesis such as commensal bacterial flora and genes related to the host immune response have been identified [1,2]. Toll-like receptors are pattern recognition receptors through which host recognizes microbial conserved molecular motifs that are broadly shared by pathogens, therefore they are very important for the regulation of mucosal innate immune responses to intestinal microbes. Perturbations in individual TLR biological signaling can prime to a number of different outcomes and elucidate a system of regulation within the intestine in which each TLR plays a largely non-redundant role in mucosal immunity. TLR4 gene, the first mammalian TLR identified is located on the long arm of human chromosome 9q32-33 [3]. It encodes the transmembrane receptor that initiates the innate immune response to common gram-negative bacteria [4,5]. TLR4 is the major transducer of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and binds specifically lipid A moiety. Signal transduction through TLR4 in combination with CD14, and MD-2 leads to activation of the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) system through the MyD88-dependent and MyD88-independent pathways and subsequent expression of inflammatory genes encoding cytokines and cell conjugation molecules as part of host defense mechanisms [6-9]. Under healthy conditions TLR4 is only minimally expressed in lamina propria mononuclear cells (LPMNCs) and intestinal epithelial cells which are partly tolerant to LPS, thus preventing an exaggerated immune response mediated by the large number of bacteria in the intestinal lumen and maintaining a basal state of activation [10,11]. However, TLR4 expression is upregulated in human IBD colitis, maximizing responsiveness to the environment and reflecting an aberrant state of activation [12-15]. Higher levels of TLR4 mRNA and protein were found in the inflamed colonic mucosa in pediatric IBD patients [16]. Two common co-segregating polymorphisms affecting the extracellular domain of the TLR4 (Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile) have been described in humans. Individuals heterozygous for these mutations have a blunted response to inhaled LPS [17]. These polymorphisms are thought to be associated with increased susceptibility to IBD. However, population studies reveal discordant results in geographical distribution. Thereby, we sought to investigate whether Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile single nucleotide polymorphisms of the gene encoding the TLR4 determine susceptibility to IBD in Moroccan patients and assessed their influence on phenotype expression.

Methods

Study population

Enrolled in this study were 117 IBD Moroccan patients (83 CD; 34 UC) and 112 healthy unrelated blood donors. The diagnosis of CD or UC was established according to conventional clinical, endoscopic, radiological and histological criteria as previously reported [18,19]. CD was classified according to the Montreal classification [20]. The case report form included questions on disease phenotype and location, age at diagnosis, toxic behavior and other clinical features. The ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Casablanca approved the study and a written informed consent was obtained from all human subjects.

Molecular analysis of TLR4 polymorphisms

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes using the salting out procedure. Two single nucleotide variations, corresponding to two amino acid polymorphisms for TLR4, were analyzed: the Asp299Gly (896A/G), rs4986790 and the Thr399Ile (1196C/T), rs4986791. Typing of the polymorphisms was performed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (RFLP). Upstream and downstream primers used for the PCR amplification were: F: (5′- AGCATACTTAGACTACTACCTCCATG-3′), R: (5′- GAGAGATTTGAGTTTCAATGTGGG-3′) for TLR4Asp299Gly And F: (5′-GGTTGCTGTTCTCAAAGTGATTTTGGGAGAA-3′), R:(5′-GGAAATCCAGATGTTCTAGTTGTTCTAAGCC-3′) for TLR4Thr399Ile. Reactions were performed in a 25 μl volume containing 200 μM of each dNTP (0.5 μl of dNTP mix, 10 mM each), 0.2 μM of each of the forward and reverse primers (0.5 μl of each 10 μM primers), 2 mM MgCl2 (1 μl of MgCl2, 50 mM) and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (1 μl of 1U/μl enzyme), 1× PCR buffer (2.5 μl of 10× PCR buffer). PCR conditions comprised 5 min at 95°C then 35 cycles of denaturing were performed at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C (Asp299Gly) and at 53°C (Thr399Ile) for 1 min, 72°C for 30 s. A final extension phase of 72°C for 10 minutes was used. PCR products were cleaved overnight at 37°C with Nco I for Asp299Gly polymorphism and HinfI for Thr399Ile polymorphism (Biolabs). The digests were run on a 3% agarose gel and visualized under UV light using ethidium bromide. The mutant alleles (GG)/(TT) contained an Nco I/ Hinf I restriction site for the Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile polymorphisms respectively, allowing RFLP analysis of the digested products. Digestion at the Nco I site yields fragments of 168 and 20 bp, the one at Hinf I site yields fragments of 98 and 26 bp. The wild-type allele for both polymorphisms remained uncut.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed with MedCalc 11.6. Chi-square test was used to compare the allele and genotype frequencies between disease and control groups. The Fisher’s exact test was used when appropriate. The observed genotype frequencies were compared with the predicted frequencies by the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. The average age was determined by the rank sum test. Associations between genotypes and risk of IBD were estimated by calculating odds ratio (OR) with confidence interval of 95% (CI). P values less than 0.05 were considered significant in disease risk association tests. The χ2 test or Fisher test was used to correlate the TLR4 polymorphisms and clinical parameters. The Bonferroni correction method was applied for correction for multiple testing in sub-phenotype analysis; The phenotype genotype correlation was considered statistically significant if the p value was less than 0.005 for CD and 0.007 for UC. According to Power Calculator for Genetic Studies 2006 software (http://www.sph.umich.edu/csg/abecasis/CaTS/), this study had 15% of power to detect an OR of 1.5.

TLR4 meta-analysis

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Genetic association studies were included in our meta-analysis if they met the following criteria: (a) Studies that evaluated the association between the TLR4 Asp299Gly, Thr399Ile polymorphisms and IBD, (b) A case–control study design, (c) The study reported sufficient data to calculate allele frequencies, odds ratios and confidence intervals of cases and controls for carriage of the TLR4 299Gly and 399Ile alleles. While major exclusion criteria were: (a) case-only study and review articles (b) absence of the mutant allele in both cases and controls, (c) studies without the raw data of the TLR4 Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile genotypes.

Pooled studies for case–control meta-analysis

Twenty-four case–control studies were identified through the literature search. According to the inclusion criteria, twenty studies were retrieved in CD meta-analysis (Table 1), four of them contained more than one cohort [21-24]. UC meta-analysis reported data from 13 of the included studies (Table 2); two of them contained more than one cohort [21,22]. Six studies met one of the exclusion criteria [25-30].
Table 1

Pooled analysis of studies exploring the role of TLR4 Asp299Gly in CD

Study Cases (Events/Total) Controls (Events/Total) Odds ratio 95% CI P value
Arnott et al. 2004 [ 31 ] 50/46833/3781,250,79 to 1,98
Franchimont et al. 2004 [ 32 ] (1) 73/66814/2782,311,28 to 4,17
Franchimont et al. 2004 [ 32 ] (2) 26/22614/2782,451,25 to 4,81
Torok et al. 2004 [ 33 ] 14/20412/2901,700,77 to 3,77
Braat et al. 2005 [ 34 ] 68/82213/2741,810,98 to 3,33
Brand et al. 2005 [ 22 ] 29/40815/3981,951,03 to 3,70
Lakatos et al. 2005 [ 35 ] 104/105448/4000,800,56 to 1,15
Gazouli et al. 2005 [ 36 ] 19/2406/2002,781,09 to 7,10
Oostenbrug et al. 2005 [ 37 ] 53/78627/5921,510,94 to 2,43
Ouburg et al. 2005 [ 38 ] 23/22418/3402,041,08 to 3,88
Fries et al. 2005 [ 39 ] (1) 2/462/1182,630,36 to 19,29
Fries et al. 2005 [ 39 ] (2) 10/1202/1185,271,13 to 24,60
Zouiten-Mekki et al. 2009 [ 40 ] 12/1809/1601,190,49 to 2,92
Hong et al. 2007 [ 41 ] 26/36432/3760,820,48 to 1,42
Baumgart et al. 2007 [ 21 ] (1) 6/28816/4040,510,20 to 1,33
Baumgart et al. 2007 [ 21 ] (2) 28/48249/8060,950,59 to 1,54
Browning et al. 2007 [ 42 ] 50/77844/8321,230,81 to 1,86
De Ridder et al. 2007 [ 23 ] (1) 11/14420/4881,930,91 to 4,14
De Ridder et al. 2007 [ 23 ] (2) 63/75620/4882,121,27 to 3,56
Riis et al. 2007 [ 43 ] 32/422152/12360,580,39 to 0,87
Hume et al. 2008 [ 44 ] 87/123836/7201,430,96 to 2,14
Rigoli et al. 2008 [ 45 ] 10/2668/2060,960,38 to 2,49
Manolakis et al. 2013 [ 46 ] 20/32633/5481,020,58 to 1,81
Current study 2014 9/16610/2241,220,49 to 3,09
Total (fixed effects) 825/10676633/101521,261,13 to 1,420.0001
Total (random effects) 825/10676633/101521,351,12 to 1,64
Table 2

Pooled analysis of studies exploring the role of TLR4 Asp299Gly in UC

Study Cases (Events/Total) Controls (Events/Total) Odds ratio 95% CI P value
Arnott et al. 2004 [ 31 ] 35/49233/3780,8010,49 to 1,31
Franchimont et al. (1) 2004 [ 32 ] 32/32614/2782,0521,07 to 3,93
Torok et al. 2004 [ 33 ] 18/19612/2902,3431,10 to 4,98
Braat et al. 2005 [ 34 ] 24/45213/2741,1260,56 to 2,25
Gazouli et al. 2005 [ 36 ] 6/1706/2001,1830,37 to 3,73
Oostenbrug et al. 2005 [ 37 ] 21/35827/5921,3040,72 to 2,34
Baumgart et al. 2007 [ 21 ] (1) 8/23616/4040,8510,36 to 2,02
Baumgart et al. 2007 [ 21 ] (2) 24/29049/8061,3940,84 to 2,31
Browning et al. 2007 [ 42 ] 51/81044/8321,2030,79 to 1,82
Riis et al. 2007 [ 43 ] 53/808152/12360,5010,36 to 0,69
De Ridder et al. 2007 [ 23 ] (1) 33/45220/4881,8431,04 to 3,26
De Ridder et al. 2007 [ 23 ] (2) 4/6220/4881,6140,53 to 4,88
Rigoli et al. 2008 [ 45 ] 3/908/2060,8530,22 to 3,29
Manolakis et al. 2013 [ 46 ] 41/37433/5481,9211,19 to 3,10
Current study 2014 6/6810/2242,0710,72 to 5,92
Total (fixed effects) 359/5184457/72441,0920,94 to 1,260.20
Total (random effects) 359/5184457/72441,2680,95 to 1,69
twelve studies comprising 2466 cases and 2210 controls were included in CD meta-analysis (Table 3), and nine of them in UC meta-analysis with 1358 cases and 1773 controls (Table 4).
Table 3

Pooled analysis of studies exploring the role of TLR4 Thr399Ile in CD

Study Sample size Cases (Events/Total) Controls (Events/Total) Odds ratio 95% CI P value
Torok et al. 2004 [ 33 ] CD: 10216/20412/2901.9720.91 to 4.26
HC: 145
Braat et al. 2005 [ 34 ] CD: 20430/40819/3981.5830.87 to 2.86
HC: 199
Gazouli et al. 2005 [ 36 ] CD: 1201/2402/2000.4140.037 to 4.60
HC: 100
Oostenbrug et al. 2005 [ 37 ] CD: 39369/100829/5981.4420.92 to 2.25
HC: 296
Zouiten-Mekki et al. 2009 [ 40 ] CD: 9013/1808/1601.4790.59 to 3.66
HC: 80
Hong et al. 2007 [ 41 ] CD: 18230/36432/3760.9660.57 to 1.62
HC: 188
Browning et al. 2007 [ 42 ] CD: 38947/77846/8321.0990.72 to 1.67
HC: 416
De Ridder et al. 2007 [ 23 ] CD: 45072/90022/4881.8421.12 to 3.00
HC: 244
Rigoli et al. 2008 [ 45 ] CD: 1338/2666/2061.0340.35 to 3.02
HC:103
Azzam et al. 2012 [ 47 ] CD: 4626/9222/1001.3970.72 to 2.69
HC: 50
Manolakis et al. 2013 [ 46 ] CD: 16320/32633/5481.0200.57 to 1.80
HC: 274
Our study 2014 CD: 837/1663/2243.2430.82 to 12.73
HC: 112
Total (fixed effects) 339/4932234/44201.3451.12 to 1.600.002
Total (random effects) 339/4932234/44201.3361.11 to 1.59
Table 4

Pooled analysis of studies exploring the role of TLR4 Thr399Ile in UC

Study Sample size Cases (Events/Total) Controls (Events/Total) Odds 95% CI P value
Torok et al. 2004 [ 33 ] UC: 9822/19612/2902.9291.41 to 6.06
HC: 145
Gazouli et al. 2005 [ 36 ] UC: 853/1702/2001.7780.29 to 10.77
HC: 100
Oostenbrug et al. 2005 [ 37 ] UC: 17924/43419/5981.7840.96 to 3.30
HC: 296
Zouiten-Mekki et al. 2009 [ 40 ] UC: 302/602/1602.7240.37 to 19.78
HC: 80
Browning et al. 2007 [ 42 ] UC: 40559/81046/8321.3420.90 to 1.99
HC: 416
De Ridder et al. 2007 [ 23 ] UC: 25734/51422/4881.5000.86 to 2.60
HC: 244
Rigoli et al. 2008 [ 45 ] UC: 453/906/2061.1490.28 to 4.70
HC:103
Manolakis et al. 2013 [ 46 ] UC: 18741/37433/5481.9211.19 to 3.10
HC: 274
Our study 2014 UC: 343/683/2243.4000.67 to 17.25
HC: 112
Total (fixed effects) 191/2716145/35461.6951.35 to 2.110.0001
Total (random effects) 191/2716145/35461.6991.35 to 2.12
A meta-analysis combining CD and UC patients for the two tested SNPs: Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile included 13 and 9 studies respectively (Tables 5 and 6).
Table 5

Pooled analysis of studies exploring the role of TLR4 Asp299Gly in IBD

Study Sample size Cases (Events/Total) Controls (Events/Total) Odds ratio 95% CI P value
Arnott et al. 2004 [ 31 ] IBD: 48085/96033/3781,0160,667 to 1,54
HC: 189
Franchimont et al. 2004 [ 32 ] IBD: 610131/122014/2782,2681,286 to 4,00
HC: 139
Torok et al. 2004 [ 33 ] IBD: 20032/40012/2902,0141,019 to 3,98
HC: 145
Braat et al. 2005 [ 34 ] IBD: 63792/127413/2741,5630,861 to 2,83
HC: 137
Gazouli et al. 2005 [ 36 ] IBD: 20525/4106/2002,1000,847 to 5,20
HC: 100
Oostenbrug et al. 2005 [ 37 ] IBD: 57274/114427/5921,4470,921 to 2,27
HC: 296
Baumgart et al. 2007 [ 21 ] (1) IBD: 26214/52416/4040,6660,321 to 1,38
HC: 202
Baumgart et al. 2007 [ 21 ] (2) IBD: 38652/77249/8061,1160,745 to 1,67
HC: 403
Browning et al. 2007 [ 42 ] IBD: 796101/159244/8321,2130,843 to 1,74
HC: 416
Riis et al. 2007 [ 43 ] IBD: 61585/1230152/12360,5290,401 to 0,69
HC: 618
De Ridder et al. 2007 [ 23 ] IBD: 10315/20620/4881,8380,921 to 3,66
De Ridder et al. 2007 [ 23 ] IBD: 60496/120820/4882,0201,233 to 3,31
HC: 244
Rigoli et al. 2008 [ 45 ] IBD: 17813/3568/2060,9380,382 to 2,30
HC: 103
Manolakis et al. 2013 [ 46 ] IBD: 35061/70033/5481,4900,960 to 2,31
HC: 274
Our study 2014 IBD:11715/23410/2241,4660,644 to 3,33
HC:112
Total (fixed effects) 891/12230457/72441,1541,021 to 1,300.015
Total (random effects) 891/12230457/72441,3061,006 to 1,69
Table 6

Pooled analysis of studies exploring the role of TLR4 Thr399Ile in IBD

Study Sample size Cases (Events/Total) Controls (Events/Total) Odds 95% CI P value
Torok et al. 2004 [ 33 ] IBD: 20038/40012/2902.4321.24 to 4.74
HC: 145
Gazouli et al. 2005 [ 36 ] IBD: 2054/4102/2000.9750.17 to 5.37
HC: 100
Oostenbrug et al. 2005 [ 37 ] IBD: 72193/144229/5981.3530.88 to 2.07
HC: 299
Zouiten-Mekki et al. 2009 [ 40 ] IBD: 12015/2408/1601.2670.52 to 3.06
HC: 80
Browning et al. 2007 [ 42 ] IBD: 794106/158846/8321.2220.85 to 1.74
HC: 416
De Ridder et al. 2007 [ 23 ] IBD: 707106/141422/4881.7171.07 to 2.75
HC: 244
Rigoli et al. 2008 [ 45 ] IBD: 17812/3566/2061.1630.43 to 3.14
HC: 103
Manolakis et al. 2013 [ 46 ] IBD: 35061/70033/5481.4900.96 to 2.31
HC: 274
Our study 2014 IBD: 11710/2343/2243.2890.89 to 12.11
HC: 112
Total (fixed effects) 445/6784161/35461.4791.22 to 1.820.0001
Total (random effects) 445/6784161/35461.4651.21 to 1.80
The risk of IBD associated with the TLR4 polymorphism was estimated for each study by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The meta-ORs were estimated using a fixed-effects model with the wild-type allele as reference group. Genetic heterogeneity was tested by Cochran’s (Q) test, I2 statistics was used to quantify the between-study heterogeneity effect. When a significant Q test (Q > 0.10; I2 > 50%) indicated heterogeneity across studies, data were recombined using a random-effects model to estimate common ORs. The meta-analyses were conducted by Review Manager 5.0 and MedCalc bvba 12.3.0 softwares. Pooled analysis of studies exploring the role of TLR4 Asp299Gly in CD Pooled analysis of studies exploring the role of TLR4 Asp299Gly in UC Pooled analysis of studies exploring the role of TLR4 Thr399Ile in CD Pooled analysis of studies exploring the role of TLR4 Thr399Ile in UC Pooled analysis of studies exploring the role of TLR4 Asp299Gly in IBD Pooled analysis of studies exploring the role of TLR4 Thr399Ile in IBD

Results

Hundred and seventeen patients with IBD (83 CD; 34 UC) and 112 control subjects from the general population were genotyped for the presence of TLR4Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile polymorphisms. The average age of CD, UC patients and controls was 27.6 ± 2.3, 40 ± 5.0 and 31.3 ± 2.1 years respectively. The distributions of genotype and allele frequencies of both TLR4Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile polymorphisms in CD patients (X2 = 0.03, P = 0.86; X2 = 0.02, P = 0.90) and healthy controls (X2 = 2.86, P = 0.24; X2 = 0.01, P = 0.94) were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. In patients with UC, genotype and allele frequencies distributions for Asp299Gly polymorphism (X2 = 0.03, P = 0.86) were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium but not for Th399ILeu polymorphism (X2 = 19.05, P <0.001). In order to study associations of TLR4 variants in IBD overall and in CD and UC in particular, the distribution of TLR4 polymorphic alleles was assessed. Genotype and allele frequencies are given in Table 7 and genotypic and allelic odds ratios and test P-values are presented in Table 8. None CD nor UC colitis patients were homozygous for G allele. Mutant allele frequency was 5.4% in CD, 8.8% in UC and 4.5% in HC. No significant difference was noticed in allele distributions of the Asp299Gly polymorphism between the control and patient groups. Likewise, no significant association of IBD with the Thr399Ile polymorphism was found in either cohort (allele frequencies: HC 1.3%, CD 4.2%, UC 4.4%). TT genotype was not observed in both CD patients and HC and only one individual carried the 399Ile variant at both alleles in UC. Co-segregation of TLR4 polymorphic alleles was observed in only 33% of controls (3 out of 9), 33% in UC (2 out of 6) and 60% in CD (6 out of 10).
Table 7

Allele and genotype frequencies of the studied polymorphisms in the group of patients with Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and controls

Group TLR4 Asp299Gly TLR4 Thr399Ile
A G AA AG GG C T CC CT TT
CD (%) N = 83 157 (94.6)9 (5.4)74 (89.2)9 (10.8)-159 (95.8)7 (4.2)76 (91.6)7 (8.4)-
UC (%) N = 34 62 (91.2)6 (8.8)28 (82.4)6 (17.6)-65 (95.6)3 (4.4)32 (94.1)1 (2.9)1 (2.9)
Controls (%) N = 112 214 (95.5)10 (4.5)103 (92.0)8 (7.1)1 (0.9)221 (98.7)3 (1.3)109 (97.3)3 (2.7)-
Table 8

Odds ratios and P values for association of TLR4 variants with IBD status

SNP Trait Genotype/Allele OR CI P Value
Asp299Gly CD AG 1.57(0.58-4.25)0.38
G 1.23(0.49-3.09)0.66
UC AG 2.76(0.88-8.61)0.08
G 2.07(0.72-5.92)0.17
Thr399Ile CD CT 3.35(0.84-13.35)0.09
T 3.24(0.83-12.74)0.09
UC CT 1.14(0.11-11.29)0.91
TT 10.11(0.40-254.1)0.16
T 3.4(0.67-17.25)0.14
Allele and genotype frequencies of the studied polymorphisms in the group of patients with Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and controls Odds ratios and P values for association of TLR4 variants with IBD status Meta-analysis of our dataset with the published studies showed a significant association between TLR4 Asp299Gly variant allele and CD risk in a total of 5338 cases and 5076 controls (Pooled ORs = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.12-1.38; P = 0.0001) (Figure 1). In the other hand, no association with UC was found when evaluating disease risk in 2592 patients and 3622 controls (Table 2), OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.95-1.69; P = 0.20 (Figure 2). Heterogeneity in odds ratios between studies was evidenced for CD (Q = 54.5, 23 df, P = 0.0002, I2 = 57.6%) and UC (Q = 43.4%, 14 df, P = 0.0001,I2 = 67.8).
Figure 1

Forest plots for the association of TLR4 A299G and risk of CD.

Figure 2

Forest plots for the association of TLR4 A299G and risk of UC.

Forest plots for the association of TLR4 A299G and risk of CD. Forest plots for the association of TLR4 A299G and risk of UC. Combining Asp299Gly results for CD and UC (6115 cases and 3622 controls), an overall significant increased risk for IBD was observed, OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.03-1.30; P = 0.015 (Figure 3). However, a significant heterogeneity in allelic frequencies distribution is reported (Cohran’s Q = 52.9, I2 = 73.6%).
Figure 3

Forest plots for the association of TLR4 A299G and risk of IBD.

Forest plots for the association of TLR4 A299G and risk of IBD. Based on the studies published so far combined to our results, we observed a significant association between the T allele of the TLR4Thr399Ile Polymorphism and both CD and UC risk (Figures 4 and 5). As well, TLR4Thr399Ile variant increased the overall IBD susceptibility when combining CD and UC results (OR = 1.46, 95%CI: 1.21-1.76; P < 0.0001) for a total of 3392 cases and 1773 controls (Figure 6).
Figure 4

Forest plots for the association of TLR4 T399I and risk of CD.

Figure 5

Forest plots for the association of TLR4 T399I and risk of UC.

Figure 6

Forest plots for the association of TLR4 T399I and risk of IBD.

Forest plots for the association of TLR4 T399I and risk of CD. Forest plots for the association of TLR4 T399I and risk of UC. Forest plots for the association of TLR4 T399I and risk of IBD. In the present meta-analysis, we did not observed heterogeneity between studies for TLR4Thr399Ile Polymorphism distribution in CD (Q = 9.05, DF = 11, I2 = −21.54%; P = 0.62), UC (Q = 5.18, Df = 8, I2 = −54.4%; P = 0.73) and IBD (Cohran’sQ = 7.84, DF = 10, I2 = −27.5%; P = 0.64). Genotype-phenotype correlation was investigated; demographic and clinical characteristics of CD and UC patients according to TLR4 polymorphisms are shown in (Tables 9 and 10). A significant association was found between the need for surgery and possession of one or more Asp299gly variant alleles in UC patients (P = 0.004). The presence of TLR4 variant alleles was not associated with smoking habits, age of diagnosis, disease location and behavior, family history and presence of extra-intestinal manifestations. Separate analyses in men and women did not reveal sex related associations. None of our UC patients had an appendectomy. The correlation study between Th399ILeu polymorphism and CD or UC didn’t allow to associate TLR4 genotype with a particular phenotype.
Table 9

Genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with Crohn’s disease

Parameter N Asp299gly (%) P value Chi-square test Thr399Ile (%) P value Chi-square test
AA AG GG CC CT TT
Age of onset830.481.450.591.05
<17 years1010 (100.0)-10 (100.0)-
17-406355 (87.3.)8 (12.7)57 (90.5)6 (9.5)
>40 years109 (90.0)1 (10.0)9 (90.0)1 (10.0)
Sex830.350.870.171.92
Woman2524 (96.0)1 (4.0)25 (100.0)-
Man5850 (86.2)8 (13.8)51 (87.9)7 (12.1)
Type830.542.140.363.23
Fistulizing3531 (88.6)4 (11.4)33 (94.3)2 (5.7)
Non fistulizing non stenosing2420 (83.3)4 (16.7)20 (83.3)(16.7)
Stenosing1716 (94.1)1 (5.9)16 (94.1)1 (5.9)
Fistulizing stenosing77 (100.0)-7 (100.0)-
Localization830.801.670.940.82
L13026 (86.7)4 (13.3)27 (90.0)3 (10.0)
L22017 (85.0)3 (5.0)18 (90.0)2 (10.0)
L32624 (92.3)2 ()24 (92.3)2 (7.7)
L433 (100.0)-3 (100.0)-
L4 + L244 (100.0)-4 (100.0)-
Smoking830.044.440.171.92
Presence3326 (78.8)7 (21.2)28 (84.8)5 (15.2)
Absence5048 (96.0)2 (4.0)48 (96)2 (4.0)
SFC830.910.010.760.09
Presence44 (100.0)-4 (100.0)-
Absence7970 (88.6)9 (11.4)72 (91.1)7 (8.9)
Appendectomy830.840.040.580.30
Presence1211 (91.7)1 (8.3)10 (83.3)2 (16.7)
Absence7163 (88.7)8 (11.3)66 (93.0)5 (7.0)
EIM830.970.0010.970.001
Presence4238 (90.5)4 (9.5)39 (92.9)3 (7.1)
Absence4136 (87.8)5 (12.2)37 (95.1)4 (4.9)
Surgery830.500.450.450.57
Presence4138 (92.7)3 (7.3)39 (95.1)2 (4.9)
Absence4236 (85.7)6 (14.3)37 (88.1)5 (11.9)

SFC: similar familial cases; EIM: extra intestinal manifestations; N: total number; AA: wild type TLR4 Asp299gly, AG: TLR4 Asp299gly heterozygous variant, GG: TLR4 Asp299gly homozygous variant; CC: wild type TLR4 Thr399Ile, CT: TLR4 Thr399Ile heterozygous variant, TT: TLR4 Thr399Ile homozygous variant.

Table 10

Genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with ulcerative colitis

Parameter N Asp299gly (%) P value Chi-square test Thr399Ile (%) P value Chi-square test
AA AG GG CC CT TT
Age of onset 340.350.890.342.13
<17 years -----
17-40 2018 (90.0)2 (10.0)-19 (95.0)1 (5.0)-
>40 years 1410 (71.4)4 (28.6)-13 (92.9)-1 (7.1)
Sex 340.890.0180.362.06
Woman 1513 (86.7)2 (13.3)-14 (93.3)1 (6.7)-
Man 1915 (78.9)4 (21.1)-18 (94.7)-1 (5.3)
Extent of the disease 340.313.550.169.34
E1 42 (50.0)2 (50.0)-3 (75.0)-1 (25.0)
E2 1513 (86.7)2 (13.3)-15 (100.0)--
E3 22 (100.0)--2 (100.0)--
E4 1311 (84.6)2 (15.4)-12 (92.3)1 (7.7)-
SFC 340.390.740.970.06
Presence 11 (100.0)--1 (100.0)-
Absence 3327 (81.8)6 (18.2)-31 (93.9)1 (3.0)1 (3.0)
Smoking 340.930.0080.203.17
Presence 97 (77.8)2 (22.2)-8 (88.9)-1 (11.1)
Absence 2521 (84.)4 (16.0)-24 (96.0)1 (4.0)-
EIM 340.890.0180.352.05
Presence 1915 (78.9)4 (21.1)-18 (94.7)-1 (5.3)
Absence 1513 (86.7)2 (13.3)-14 (93.3)1 (6.7)-
Surgery 340.0048.30.084.97
Presence 62 (33.3)4 (66.7)-5 (83.3)1 (16.7)-
Absence 2826 (92.9)2 (7.1)-27 (96.4)-1 (3.6)

SFC: similar familial cases; EIM: extra intestinal manifestations; N: total number; AA: wild type TLR4 Asp299gly, AG: TLR4 Asp299gly heterozygous variant, GG: TLR4 Asp299gly homozygous variant; CC: wild type TLR4 Thr399Ile, CT: TLR4 Thr399Ile heterozygous variant, TT: TLR4 Thr399Ile homozygous variant.

Genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with Crohn’s disease SFC: similar familial cases; EIM: extra intestinal manifestations; N: total number; AA: wild type TLR4 Asp299gly, AG: TLR4 Asp299gly heterozygous variant, GG: TLR4 Asp299gly homozygous variant; CC: wild type TLR4 Thr399Ile, CT: TLR4 Thr399Ile heterozygous variant, TT: TLR4 Thr399Ile homozygous variant. Genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with ulcerative colitis SFC: similar familial cases; EIM: extra intestinal manifestations; N: total number; AA: wild type TLR4 Asp299gly, AG: TLR4 Asp299gly heterozygous variant, GG: TLR4 Asp299gly homozygous variant; CC: wild type TLR4 Thr399Ile, CT: TLR4 Thr399Ile heterozygous variant, TT: TLR4 Thr399Ile homozygous variant.

Discussion

Given the evidence that an altered innate immune response and chronic inflammation are implicated in IBD pathogenesis, genetic influence of pattern recognition receptors was clearly suggested as a trigger of CD and UC. Several efforts were undertaken to demonstrate associations of the human TLR4 gene (Gene map locus 9q32-q33) with IBD and its clinical manifestation. Attention was focused on co-segregating SNPs located in exon 3 of TLR4 causing amino acid exchanges at positions 299 (Asp299Gly) and 399 (Thr399Ile) which are located in the extracellular domain of the receptor [17,48]. Association of TLR4 Asp299Gly with CD was first reported by Braat et al. [30] subsequent studies have had divergent results and showed strong evidence of ethnic differences. In view of the discrepant data regarding the association of the TLR4 gene with IBD and its clinical complications, we investigated for the first time the potential influence of TLR4 SNPs in the susceptibility to IBD in a cohort of Moroccan patients. However, the statistical power was very low and could be considered a limitation in this study. Our study showed that the GG genotype was not found in both CD and UC patients. No significant differences were observed in allele frequencies of the TLR4Asp299Gly among patients and controls. In addition, although slightly increased frequencies of the mutant alleles were encountered, we were not able to identify a significant difference in allele distributions of the TLR4Thr399Ile in our case–control study. In line with our results, a Tunisian study that genotyped 90 patients with CD and 80 healthy individuals for the Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile polymorphisms, reported the absence of association between CD and TLR4 gene in a north African population [40]. Although the Tunisian CD population showed a similar overall pattern of allelic frequencies, it is of some note that the genotype-phenotype correlation revealed divergent results. While the Thr399Ile variant allele was associated with early disease onset in Tunisian patients, no correlation with a particular phenotype was observed for this polymorphism in the Moroccan patients. Our study showed that the presence of Asp299Gly variant allele was associated with the need for surgery in UC patients (P = 0.004). Furthermore, the occurrence of one Asp299gly risk allele in CD patients was suggestive of a trend of association with smoking habits (P = 0.04) that was no more observed after correction for multiple testing. Being in linkage disequilibrium, TLR4 mutant alleles are known to be inherited in the form of Asp299Gly/Thr399Ile haplotype [48]. In a German cohort, the co-segregation between mutant alleles represented 100% in controls, whereas it was not complete in CD and UC patients: 94% and 86% respectively [33]. These observations contrast our findings where simultaneous presence of the mutated alleles was only observed in 33% of controls, 33% of UC and 60% of CD patients. Results on the relationship of Asp299Gly SNP alone or in combination with Thr399Ile with IBD are inconsistent between studies. No difference in TLR4 allele frequency between IBD patients and controls was observed in Hungarian [35], Saudi Arabian [47], Southern Italian [45], New Zealandian [41] and EC-IBD [43] study groups populations. Genetic heterogeneity within Europe was evidenced by Arnott et al. when reporting lack of association of TLR4 and CD14 variants in Scottish and Irish CD patients [31]. Moreover, Baumgart DC et al. reported an association between IBD and the CD14 c.1-260C T promoter but not with the TLR4 (p.D299G) variant in Germans and Hungarians [21]. Interestingly, the heterozygous and homozygous pattern for the mutated allele was not detected in any of the individuals from the Japanese [49], Korean [24], Chinese Han population [25] and Zhuang population from the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region of China [26]. TLR4 was linked to an increased IBD (CD or UC) risk in many other diverse investigations. Significant associations were found in patients drawn from Belgian [32], German [22,33], Greek [36,46] and Dutch [34] populations. In addition, several meta-analyses provided evidence that the Asp299Gly SNP is associated with CD and IBD in Caucasians [27,42,50]. The results of our meta-analysis indicate a significant association between TLR4 Thr399Ile and CD and UC risk in different populations. Noteworthy, a lack of heterogeneity between studies was observed regarding distribution of this polymorphism. The results support that this variant is a potential risk factor for IBD. A correlation between Asp299Gly variant and an increased disease risk is also reported for CD and IBD but not regarding UC, which is in line with de Jager et al. findings [28]. This indicates that the risk allele is either not associated with disease susceptibility or that the small number of UC cohorts did not provide sufficient power to detect an association. A correlation between TLR4 polymorphisms and UC has been rarely discussed, more association studies are needed to validate the conclusion. To date it is well known that the frequency of the investigated TLR4 gene SNPs varies between populations [27,31]. Overall, there was inescapable evidence for considerable genetic heterogeneity. This observation has been explained by geographic and ethnicity-related gene effect on disease susceptibility [51]. Our results showed that the distribution of the risk alleles varies between both TLR4 polymorphisms. Therefore, we offer additional evidence for differences in the contribution of individual genetic determinants between populations. Browning et al., argued that negative studies with results that do not achieve statistical significance can still contribute evidence for association, having important implications for the first generation of whole genome association studies [42]. In view of the role of potential confounders related to the present study and to discrepant results between populations, it is likely that the contribution of different sample size, selection bias, phenotypic heterogeneity and population stratification in case control studies can’t be ruled out. These data demonstrate further the real difficulties in candidate gene analysis in complex diseases. Moreover, given that IBD is a polygenic disease it is provided that association studies will reveal various sets of susceptible genes. Therefore, further large-scale studies are required to obtain a clear insight into the impact of the pattern recognition receptors in the pathophysiological and immunogenetic aspects of IBD and to explore the contribution of other genes involved in various processes.

Conclusions

In the present study, we have demonstrated that the common mutations in the TLR4 gene are not associated with IBD in a sample of Moroccan patients. However, our dataset contributed to the significant association observed in TLR4 meta-analysis. It is likely that the distribution of TLR4 gene polymorphisms have ethnic differences. Our data suggests that other genetic and environmental factors may play a role in IBD susceptibility and behavior in this population. However, because of the relatively small sample size, additional well-powered studies are needed to confirm our findings.
  50 in total

1.  [Toll-like receptor gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease in Chinese Han and Caucasian populations].

Authors:  Xiu-yun Shen; Rui-hua Shi; Ying Wang; Hong-jie Zhang; Xi-qiao Zhou; Fang-cheng Shen; Ke-bei Li
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2010-05-25

Review 2.  The evolving epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Fergus Shanahan; Charles N Bernstein
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.287

3.  Analysis of TLR4 and TLR2 polymorphisms in inflammatory bowel disease in a Guangxi Zhuang population.

Authors:  Lan Chen; Mei-Jiao Lin; Ling-Ling Zhan; Xiao-Ping Lv
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T variant in Moroccan patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Nezha Senhaji; Nadia Serbati; Brehima Diakité; Sofia Arazzakou; Khalil Hamzi; Wafaa Badre; Sellama Nadifi
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  Differential alteration in intestinal epithelial cell expression of toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) and TLR4 in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  E Cario; D K Podolsky
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Tolllike receptor 4 (TLR4) polymorphisms in Tunisian patients with Crohn's disease: genotype-phenotype correlation.

Authors:  Lilia Zouiten-Mekki; Maher Kharrat; Sami Karoui; Mariem Serghimi; Monia Fekih; Samira Matri; Lamia Kallel; Jalel Boubaker; Azza Filali; Habiba Chaabouni
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  The Toll-like receptor 4 D299G and T399I polymorphisms are associated with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiuyun Shen; Ruihua Shi; Hongjie Zhang; Kebei Li; Yang Zhao; Ruyang Zhang
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Readressing the role of Toll-like receptor-4 alleles in inflammatory bowel disease: colitis, smoking, and seroreactivity.

Authors:  Anastassios C Manolakis; Andreas N Kapsoritakis; Anastasia Kapsoritaki; Elisavet K Tiaka; Konstantinos A Oikonomou; Vassilis Lotis; Dimitra Vamvakopoulou; Ioanna Davidi; Nikolaos Vamvakopoulos; Spyros P Potamianos
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  CARD15/NOD2, CD14 and toll-like 4 receptor gene polymorphisms in Saudi patients with Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  Nahla Azzam; Howaida Nounou; Othman Alharbi; Abedulrahman Aljebreen; Manal Shalaby
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 6.208

10.  Association between toll-like receptors/CD14 gene polymorphisms and inflammatory bowel disease in Korean population.

Authors:  Eun Jung Kim; Woo Chul Chung; Kang-Moon Lee; Chang Nyol Paik; Sung Hoon Jung; Bo In Lee; Hiun Suk Chae; Kyu Yong Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  9 in total

1.  Association of inflammatory cytokine gene polymorphisms with inflammatory bowel disease in a Moroccan cohort.

Authors:  N Senhaji; A Serrano; W Badre; N Serbati; M Karkouri; Y Zaid; S Nadifi; J Martin
Journal:  Genes Immun       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.676

Review 2.  Association of TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR6, and TIRAP polymorphisms with disease susceptibility.

Authors:  Mamoona Noreen; Muhammad Arshad
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.829

3.  TLR4 polymorphisms as potential predictors of atopic dermatitis in Chinese Han children.

Authors:  Jianrong Shi; Lin He; Ran Tao; Huiwen Zheng; Wei Li; Shuangshuang Huang; Yunling Li; Shiqiang Shang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.124

4.  Polymorphisms in oxidative pathway related genes and susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Nezha Senhaji; Sellama Nadifi; Younes Zaid; Aurora Serrano; Daniel Arturo Leon Rodriguez; Nadia Serbati; Mehdi Karkouri; Wafaa Badre; Javier Martín
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Toll-Like Receptor 4 Polymorphisms (896A/G and 1196C/T) as an Indicator of COVID-19 Severity in a Convenience Sample of Egyptian Patients.

Authors:  Sara I Taha; Aalaa K Shata; Shereen A Baioumy; Shaimaa H Fouad; Sherif G Anis; Isis M Mossad; Nouran M Moustafa; Dina M Abdou; Mariam K Youssef
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2021-11-27

6.  Neuroinflammation Upregulated Neuronal Toll-Like Receptors 2 and 4 to Drive Synucleinopathy in Neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Lucia Yi-Ru Chung; Yi-Ting Lin; Chi Liu; Yi-Cheng Tai; Han-Yi Lin; Chin-Hsien Lin; Ching-Chow Chen
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  Association of NOD1, CXCL16, STAT6 and TLR4 gene polymorphisms with Malaysian patients with Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Kek Heng Chua; Jin Guan Ng; Ching Ching Ng; Ida Hilmi; Khean Lee Goh; Boon Pin Kee
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Genetic Polymorphisms of Multidrug Resistance Gene-1 (MDR1/ABCB1) and Glutathione S-Transferase Gene and the Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease among Moroccan Patients.

Authors:  Nezha Senhaji; Yaya Kassogue; Mina Fahimi; Nadia Serbati; Wafaa Badre; Sellama Nadifi
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.711

Review 9.  The emerging role of Toll-like receptor 4 in myocardial inflammation.

Authors:  Y Yang; J Lv; S Jiang; Z Ma; D Wang; W Hu; C Deng; C Fan; S Di; Y Sun; W Yi
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 8.469

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.