Literature DB >> 25488333

Integrity in Postgraduate Research: The Student Voice.

Saadia Mahmud1, Tracey Bretag2.   

Abstract

There is a limited understanding of the student perspective of integrity in postgraduate research. This is of concern given that 'research trainees' may have a vulnerable position in formal investigations of research misconduct. This paper analyses qualitative data drawn from an Australian online academic integrity survey in a mixed methods research study. This analysis complements the quantitative survey data analysed earlier and sought to explore factors contributing to postgraduate research students' satisfaction with policy and process, the ways institutions can support students' understandings and practice, suggestions for improving breach processes, and students' concerns. We found that integrity training and modelling of ethical behaviour by staff were key factors contributing to students' satisfaction. Students would have liked more 'hands-on' integrity training, accompanied by consistent and transparent enforcement of policy. Respondents expressed concern about the credibility of research output and educational standards. We call for recommendations from the extensive literature on academic integrity policy and practice to be extended to the postgraduate research sphere.

Keywords:  Academic integrity; Misconduct; Policy; Postgraduate research; Research integrity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25488333     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9616-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  12 in total

1.  A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics.

Authors:  M W Kalichman; P J Friedman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Scientific misconduct and findings against graduate and medical students.

Authors:  Debra M Parrish
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Evaluating the Senior Companion Program: a mixed-method approach.

Authors:  Sandra S Butler
Journal:  J Gerontol Soc Work       Date:  2006

5.  Collective openness and other recommendations for the promotion of research integrity.

Authors:  Melissa S Anderson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses.

Authors:  Michael W Kalichman; Dena K Plemmons
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Nicholas H Steneck; Ruth Ellen Bulger
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Fostering integrity in postgraduate research: an evidence-based policy and support framework.

Authors:  Saadia Mahmud; Tracey Bretag
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Repairing research integrity.

Authors:  Sandra L Titus; James A Wells; Lawrence J Rhoades
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The importance of expanding current training in the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  A C Mastroianni; J P Kahn
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.