Literature DB >> 24228976

Fostering integrity in postgraduate research: an evidence-based policy and support framework.

Saadia Mahmud1, Tracey Bretag.   

Abstract

Postgraduate research students have a unique position in the debate on integrity in research as students and novice researchers. To assess how far policies for integrity in postgraduate research meet the needs of students as "research trainees," we reviewed online policies for integrity in postgraduate research at nine particular Australian universities against the Australian Code for Responsible Conduct of Research (the Code) and the five core elements of exemplary academic integrity policy identified by Bretag et al. (2011 ), i.e., access, approach, responsibility, detail, and support. We found inconsistency with the Code in the definition of research misconduct and a lack of adequate detail and support. Based on our analysis, previous research, and the literature, we propose a framework for policy and support for postgraduate research that encompasses a consistent and educative approach to integrity maintained across the university at all levels of scholarship and for all stakeholders.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24228976     DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2014.847668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  2 in total

1.  Integrity in Postgraduate Research: The Student Voice.

Authors:  Saadia Mahmud; Tracey Bretag
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Academic integrity policies against assessment fraud in postgraduate studies: An analysis of the situation in Spanish universities.

Authors:  Antoni Cerdà-Navarro; Carmen Touza; Mercè Morey-López; Elvira Curiel
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-03-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.