Literature DB >> 15362705

Scientific misconduct and findings against graduate and medical students.

Debra M Parrish1.   

Abstract

Allegations of scientific misconduct against graduate students appear to have unique attributes in the detection, investigation, processes used and sanctions imposed vis-à-vis other populations against which misconduct is alleged and found. An examination of the cases closed by the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Research Integrity and the National Science Foundation reveals that most of the allegations made against graduate and medical students are for falsification and fabrication. Further, additional processes are used in these cases, e.g., student judicial processes, more students are "set up" and more students admit misconduct. Finally, the sanctions imposed when a finding is made typically involve separation from the institution and the federal sanction ranges from none to debarment. Drawing upon the teachings and circumstances of cases involving graduate student peers is a good vehicle for illustrating the concepts and perils of misconduct to graduate students.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; National Science Foundation

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15362705     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-004-0006-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  3 in total

1.  Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1989-08-08

2.  Findings of Scientific Misconduct.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2002-05-17

3.  Findings of Scientific Misconduct.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1998-08-12
  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  Publicizing scientific misconduct and its consequences.

Authors:  Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  The university and the responsible conduct of research: who is responsible for what?

Authors:  Katherine Alfredo; Hillary Hart
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  On identifying research misconduct respondents.

Authors:  Debra M Parrish
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Correction and use of biomedical literature affected by scientific misconduct.

Authors:  Anne Victoria Neale; Justin Northrup; Rhonda Dailey; Ellen Marks; Judith Abrams
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Integrity in Postgraduate Research: The Student Voice.

Authors:  Saadia Mahmud; Tracey Bretag
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  A Proposed Strategy for Research Misconduct Policy: A Review on Misconduct Management in Health Research System.

Authors:  Shirin Djalalinia; Parviz Owlia; Hossein Malek Afzali; Mostafa Ghanei; Niloofar Peykari
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2016-07-13

Review 7.  The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.

Authors:  Felicitas Hesselmann; Verena Graf; Marion Schmidt; Martin Reinhart
Journal:  Curr Sociol       Date:  2016-10-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.