Literature DB >> 17726385

The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research.

Nicholas H Steneck1, Ruth Ellen Bulger.   

Abstract

This article discusses the key decisions and steps that have partially formalized instruction in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) in U.S. research institutions, the different purposes for offering and/or requiring such instruction, and suggestions for what needs to be done to enhance the professional development of researchers in the future. RCR education has developed during three distinct eras: the 1980s, when policy makers were most concerned with defining and investigating research misconduct; the 1990s, when there was significant but highly decentralized growth in RCR instruction; and the years since 2000, when there have been a series of reforms and educational developments. There is still a need for scientists, universities, and professional societies to develop consensus on best ethical practices in many areas of scientific research. More also needs to be learned about assessing the quality of RCR instruction and the effects of training on researchers' behavior. To help set the course for RCR instruction in the future, more effort and funding need to be directed to studying actual research behavior and the factors that influence it; RCR educators and administrators must develop a common vocabulary and framework for developing and evaluating the impact of RCR instruction; and research institutions and funding agencies alike need to take a more active role in promoting and supporting RCR instruction.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17726385     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7d4d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  45 in total

1.  Intrinsic ethics regarding integrated assessment models for climate management.

Authors:  Erich W Schienke; Seth D Baum; Nancy Tuana; Kenneth J Davis; Klaus Keller
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  A brief history of RCR education.

Authors:  Michael Kalichman
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Genomic databases access agreements: legal validity and possible sanctions.

Authors:  Yann Joly; Nik Zeps; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Integrity in Postgraduate Research: The Student Voice.

Authors:  Saadia Mahmud; Tracey Bretag
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  A Comparison of the Effects of Ethics Training on International and US Students.

Authors:  Logan M Steele; James F Johnson; Logan L Watts; Alexandra E MacDougall; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly; T H Lee Williams
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Research Ethics Education in the STEM Disciplines: The Promises and Challenges of a Gaming Approach.

Authors:  Adam Briggle; J Britt Holbrook; Joseph Oppong; Joesph Hoffmann; Elizabeth K Larsen; Patrick Pluscht
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Factors associated with research wrongdoing in Nigeria.

Authors:  Omokhoa A Adeleye; Clement A Adebamowo
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Development and validation of the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC).

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Carol R Thrush; A Lauren Crain
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Research integrity in China: problems and prospects.

Authors:  Weiqin Zeng; David Resnik
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.294

10.  A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Stephen T Murphy; Ethan P Waples; Michael D Mumford; Ryan P Brown; Shane Connelly; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2009-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.