Literature DB >> 25486563

γH2AX foci on apparently intact mitotic chromosomes: not signatures of misrejoining events but signals of unresolved DNA damage.

Marta Martín1, Mariona Terradas, Laia Hernández, Anna Genescà.   

Abstract

The presence of γH2AX foci on apparently intact mitotic chromosomes is controversial because they challenge the assumed relationship between γH2AX foci and DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). In this work, we show that after irradiation during interphase, a variety of γH2AX foci are scored in mitotic cells. Surprisingly, approximately 80% of the γH2AX foci spread over apparently undamaged chromatin at Terminal or Interstitial positions and they can display variable sizes, thus being classified as Small, Medium and Big foci. Chromosome and chromatid breaks that reach mitosis are spotted with Big (60%) and Medium (30%) Terminal γH2AX foci, but very rarely are they signaled with Small γH2AX foci. To evaluate if Interstitial γH2AX foci might be signatures of misrejoining, an mFISH analysis was performed on the same slides. The results show that Interstitial γH2AX foci lying on apparently intact chromatin do not mark sites of misrejoining, and that misrejoined events were never signaled by a γH2AX foci during mitosis. Finally, when analyzing the presence of other DNA-damage response (DDR) factors we found that all γH2AX foci-regardless their coincidence with a visible break-always colocalized with MRE11, but not with 53BP1. This pattern suggests that these γH2AX foci may be hallmarks of both microscopically visible and invisible DNA damage, in which an active, although incomplete or halted DDR is taking place.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AU, arbitrary units; DSB, DNA double-strand break; FI, fluorescence intensity; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; IRIF, ionizing radiation induced foci; M phase; MRE11; MRN complex, MRE11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex; SD, standard deviation; TIF, telomere-dysfunction induced foci; illegitimate joining; mFISH, multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization; misrepair; residual DSBs; telomeric foci; γH2AX

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25486563      PMCID: PMC4614418          DOI: 10.4161/15384101.2014.947786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  47 in total

1.  γH2AX foci formation in the absence of DNA damage: mitotic H2AX phosphorylation is mediated by the DNA-PKcs/CHK2 pathway.

Authors:  Wen-Zhi Tu; Bing Li; Bo Huang; Yu Wang; Xiao-Dan Liu; Hua Guan; Shi-Meng Zhang; Yan Tang; Wei-Qing Rang; Ping-Kun Zhou
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  Spontaneous occurrence of telomeric DNA damage response in the absence of chromosome fusions.

Authors:  Anthony J Cesare; Zeenia Kaul; Scott B Cohen; Christine E Napier; Hilda A Pickett; Axel A Neumann; Roger R Reddel
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 3.  γH2Ax: biomarker of damage or functional participant in DNA repair "all that glitters is not gold!".

Authors:  James E Cleaver
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.421

4.  gammaH2AX foci analysis for monitoring DNA double-strand break repair: strengths, limitations and optimization.

Authors:  Markus Löbrich; Atsushi Shibata; Andrea Beucher; Anna Fisher; Michael Ensminger; Aaron A Goodarzi; Olivia Barton; Penny A Jeggo
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  The telomere deprotection response is functionally distinct from the genomic DNA damage response.

Authors:  Anthony J Cesare; Makoto T Hayashi; Laure Crabbe; Jan Karlseder
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  DNA damage response is suppressed by the high cyclin-dependent kinase 1 activity in mitotic mammalian cells.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Guang Peng; Shiaw-Yih Lin; Pumin Zhang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis.

Authors:  Simona Giunta; Rimma Belotserkovskaya; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Telomere dysfunction induced by chemotherapeutic agents and radiation in normal human cells.

Authors:  Ping Li; Mi Hou; Fenglan Lou; Magnus Björkholm; Dawei Xu
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.652

9.  Eroded human telomeres are more prone to remain uncapped and to trigger a G2 checkpoint response.

Authors:  Laurent Jullien; Marie Mestre; Pierre Roux; Véronique Gire
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Genome-wide reorganization of histone H2AX toward particular fragile sites on cell activation.

Authors:  Jungmin Seo; Kwoneel Kim; Dong-Yeop Chang; Ho-Bum Kang; Eui-Cheol Shin; Jongbum Kwon; Jung Kyoon Choi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  8 in total

1.  Replication timing of large Sorex granarius (Soricidae, Eulipotyphla) telomeres.

Authors:  Julia M Minina; Tatjana V Karamysheva; Nicolaj B Rubtsov; Natalia S Zhdanova
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 2.  Histone modifications and the DNA double-strand break response.

Authors:  Hieu T Van; Margarida A Santos
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 3.  Priming chromatin for segregation: functional roles of mitotic histone modifications.

Authors:  M Lienhard Schmitz; Jonathan M G Higgins; Markus Seibert
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Development of a multiparameter flow cytometric assay as a potential biomarker for homologous recombination deficiency in women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jung-Min Lee; Nicolas Gordon; Jane B Trepel; Min-Jung Lee; Minshu Yu; Elise C Kohn
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  Dysfunction telomeres in embryonic fibroblasts and cultured in vitro pluripotent stem cells of Rattus norvegicus (Rodentia, Muridae).

Authors:  Natalya S Zhdanova; Evgenia A Vaskova; Tatyana V Karamysheva; Julia M Minina; Nykolay B Rubtsov; Suren M Zakian
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 1.800

6.  Epigenetic Modifications and Accumulation of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Oral Lichen Planus Lesions Presenting Poor Response to Therapy.

Authors:  Caroline S Dillenburg; Marco A T Martins; Luciana O Almeida; Luise Meurer; Cristiane H Squarize; Manoela D Martins; Rogerio M Castilho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  DNA double-strand break repair is impaired in presenescent Syrian hamster fibroblasts.

Authors:  Ljudmila Solovjeva; Denis Firsanov; Anastasia Vasilishina; Vadim Chagin; Nadezhda Pleskach; Andrey Kropotov; Maria Svetlova
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.946

8.  Nucleosome stability measured in situ by automated quantitative imaging.

Authors:  László Imre; Zoltán Simándi; Attila Horváth; György Fenyőfalvi; Péter Nánási; Erfaneh Firouzi Niaki; Éva Hegedüs; Zsolt Bacsó; Urbain Weyemi; Rebekka Mauser; Juan Ausio; Albert Jeltsch; William Bonner; László Nagy; Hiroshi Kimura; Gábor Szabó
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.