Literature DB >> 21878640

DNA damage response is suppressed by the high cyclin-dependent kinase 1 activity in mitotic mammalian cells.

Wei Zhang1, Guang Peng, Shiaw-Yih Lin, Pumin Zhang.   

Abstract

DNA damage response (DDR) is vital for genomic stability, and its deficiency is linked to tumorigenesis. Extensive studies in interphase (G(1)-S-G(2)) mammalian cells have revealed the mechanisms of DDR in great detail; however, how mitotic cells respond to DNA damage remains less defined. We report here that a full DDR is suppressed in mitotic mammalian cells until telophase/cytokinesis. Although early DDR markers such as the phosphorylations of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and histone H2A.x (H2AX) can be readily detected, the ionizing radiation-induced foci (IRIF) formation of late DDR markers such as breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) and p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) are absent until the telophase/cytokinesis stage. We further showed that the IR-induced ubiquitination cascade around DNA damage sites did not occur in mitotic cells, which explains, at least in part, why BRCA1 and 53BP1 cannot be recruited to the damaged sites. These observations indicate that DDR is suppressed in mitotic cells after the step of γH2AX formation. Not surprisingly, we found that the absence of a full DDR in mitotic cells was associated with the high cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) activities. More 53BP1 IRIF could be detected when the irradiated mitotic cells were treated with a CDK1 inhibitor. Further, the activation of CDK5 in interphase cells impedes the formation of 53BP1 IRIF. Together, these results suggest that the DDR is suppressed by the high CDK1 activity in mitotic mammalian cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21878640      PMCID: PMC3195557          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.267690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  44 in total

1.  RNF8 transduces the DNA-damage signal via histone ubiquitylation and checkpoint protein assembly.

Authors:  Michael S Y Huen; Robert Grant; Isaac Manke; Kay Minn; Xiaochun Yu; Michael B Yaffe; Junjie Chen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  RNF168 binds and amplifies ubiquitin conjugates on damaged chromosomes to allow accumulation of repair proteins.

Authors:  Carsten Doil; Niels Mailand; Simon Bekker-Jensen; Patrice Menard; Dorthe Helena Larsen; Rainer Pepperkok; Jan Ellenberg; Stephanie Panier; Daniel Durocher; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas; Claudia Lukas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm.

Authors:  Marcos Malumbres; Mariano Barbacid
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Orchestration of the DNA-damage response by the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase.

Authors:  Nadine K Kolas; J Ross Chapman; Shinichiro Nakada; Jarkko Ylanko; Richard Chahwan; Frédéric D Sweeney; Stephanie Panier; Megan Mendez; Jan Wildenhain; Timothy M Thomson; Laurence Pelletier; Stephen P Jackson; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The RIDDLE syndrome protein mediates a ubiquitin-dependent signaling cascade at sites of DNA damage.

Authors:  Grant S Stewart; Stephanie Panier; Kelly Townsend; Abdallah K Al-Hakim; Nadine K Kolas; Edward S Miller; Shinichiro Nakada; Jarkko Ylanko; Signe Olivarius; Megan Mendez; Ceri Oldreive; Jan Wildenhain; Andrea Tagliaferro; Laurence Pelletier; Nadine Taubenheim; Anne Durandy; Philip J Byrd; Tatjana Stankovic; A Malcolm R Taylor; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Phosphorylation of H3S10 blocks the access of H3K9 by specific antibodies and histone methyltransferase. Implication in regulating chromatin dynamics and epigenetic inheritance during mitosis.

Authors:  Qing Duan; Haobin Chen; Max Costa; Wei Dai
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination.

Authors:  Pablo Huertas; Felipe Cortés-Ledesma; Alessandro A Sartori; Andrés Aguilera; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  RPA phosphorylation facilitates mitotic exit in response to mitotic DNA damage.

Authors:  Rachel William Anantha; Elena Sokolova; James A Borowiec
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Behind the wheel and under the hood: functions of cyclin-dependent kinases in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Lara Wohlbold; Robert P Fisher
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-05-22

10.  BRIT1/MCPH1 links chromatin remodelling to DNA damage response.

Authors:  Guang Peng; Eun-Kyoung Yim; Hui Dai; Andrew P Jackson; Ineke van der Burgt; Mei-Ren Pan; Ruozhen Hu; Kaiyi Li; Shiaw-Yih Lin
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 28.824

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Push back to respond better: regulatory inhibition of the DNA double-strand break response.

Authors:  Stephanie Panier; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  γH2AX foci on apparently intact mitotic chromosomes: not signatures of misrejoining events but signals of unresolved DNA damage.

Authors:  Marta Martín; Mariona Terradas; Laia Hernández; Anna Genescà
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  UV-C irradiation delays mitotic progression by recruiting Mps1 to kinetochores.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Zhang; Youguo Ling; Wenjun Wang; Yanhong Zhang; Qingjun Ma; Pingping Tan; Ting Song; Congwen Wei; Ping Li; Xuedong Liu; Runlin Z Ma; Hui Zhong; Cheng Cao; Quanbin Xu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Rho GTPase independent regulation of ATM activation and cell survival by the RhoGEF Net1A.

Authors:  Wonkyung Oh; Jeffrey A Frost
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  microRNA-34a promotes DNA damage and mitotic catastrophe.

Authors:  Alexander V Kofman; Jungeun Kim; So Yeon Park; Evan Dupart; Christopher Letson; Yongde Bao; Kai Ding; Quan Chen; David Schiff; James Larner; Roger Abounader
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  DNA damage associated with mitosis and cytokinesis failure.

Authors:  M T Hayashi; J Karlseder
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  CDK1 regulates mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1 during mitotic DNA damage.

Authors:  Bing Yu; W Brian Dalton; Vincent W Yang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Chromoanagenesis and cancer: mechanisms and consequences of localized, complex chromosomal rearrangements.

Authors:  Andrew J Holland; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Inhibition of protein phosphatase 2A radiosensitizes pancreatic cancers by modulating CDC25C/CDK1 and homologous recombination repair.

Authors:  Dongping Wei; Leslie A Parsels; David Karnak; Mary A Davis; Joshua D Parsels; Amanda C Marsh; Lili Zhao; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence; Yi Sun; Meredith A Morgan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  A high-content cellular senescence screen identifies candidate tumor suppressors, including EPHA3.

Authors:  Jenni Lahtela; Laura B Corson; Annabrita Hemmes; Matthew J Brauer; Sonja Koopal; James Lee; Thomas L Hunsaker; Peter K Jackson; Emmy W Verschuren
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.