Literature DB >> 23850488

The telomere deprotection response is functionally distinct from the genomic DNA damage response.

Anthony J Cesare1, Makoto T Hayashi, Laure Crabbe, Jan Karlseder.   

Abstract

Loss of chromosome end protection through telomere erosion is a hallmark of aging and senescence. Here we developed an experimental system that mimics physiological telomere deprotection in human cells and discovered that the telomere deprotection response is functionally distinct from the genomic DNA damage response. We found that, unlike genomic breaks, deprotected telomeres that are recognized as DNA damage but remain in the fusion-resistant intermediate state activate differential ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) signaling where CHK2 is not phosphorylated. Also unlike genomic breaks, we found that deprotected telomeres do not contribute to the G2/M checkpoint and are instead passed through cell division to induce p53-dependent G1 arrest in the daughter cells. Telomere deprotection is therefore an epigenetic signal passed between cell generations to ensure that replication-associated telomere-dependent growth arrest occurs in stable diploid G1 phase cells before genome instability can occur.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23850488      PMCID: PMC3721072          DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  34 in total

1.  Senescence induced by altered telomere state, not telomere loss.

Authors:  Jan Karlseder; Agata Smogorzewska; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  T-loop assembly in vitro involves binding of TRF2 near the 3' telomeric overhang.

Authors:  R M Stansel; T de Lange; J D Griffith
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  How shelterin solves the telomere end-protection problem.

Authors:  T de Lange
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2011-01-05

4.  DNA-damage response and repair activities at uncapped telomeres depend on RNF8.

Authors:  Marieke H Peuscher; Jacqueline J L Jacobs
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 28.824

5.  Telomere dysfunction promotes non-reciprocal translocations and epithelial cancers in mice.

Authors:  S E Artandi; S Chang; S L Lee; S Alson; G J Gottlieb; L Chin; R A DePinho
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  ATM phosphorylates p95/nbs1 in an S-phase checkpoint pathway.

Authors:  D S Lim; S T Kim; B Xu; R S Maser; J Lin; J H Petrini; M B Kastan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Regulation of DNA damage responses by ubiquitin and SUMO.

Authors:  Stephen P Jackson; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Chfr and RNF8 synergistically regulate ATM activation.

Authors:  Jiaxue Wu; Yibin Chen; Lin-Yu Lu; Yipin Wu; Michelle T Paulsen; Mats Ljungman; David O Ferguson; Xiaochun Yu
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 15.369

9.  Five dysfunctional telomeres predict onset of senescence in human cells.

Authors:  Zeenia Kaul; Anthony J Cesare; Lily I Huschtscha; Axel A Neumann; Roger R Reddel
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 8.807

10.  A telomere-dependent DNA damage checkpoint induced by prolonged mitotic arrest.

Authors:  Makoto T Hayashi; Anthony J Cesare; James A J Fitzpatrick; Eros Lazzerini-Denchi; Jan Karlseder
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 15.369

View more
  80 in total

Review 1.  Mitotic DNA Damage Response: At the Crossroads of Structural and Numerical Cancer Chromosome Instabilities.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Lilian Kabeche; Duane A Compton; Simon N Powell; Holger Bastians
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2017-02-28

2.  Genome stability: Specialist responses at telomeres.

Authors:  Darren J Burgess
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Stop pulling my strings - what telomeres taught us about the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Eros Lazzerini-Denchi; Agnel Sfeir
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  DNA damage to a single chromosome end delays anaphase onset.

Authors:  Bárbara Alcaraz Silva; Jessica R Stambaugh; Kyoko Yokomori; Jagesh V Shah; Michael W Berns
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  γH2AX foci on apparently intact mitotic chromosomes: not signatures of misrejoining events but signals of unresolved DNA damage.

Authors:  Marta Martín; Mariona Terradas; Laia Hernández; Anna Genescà
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Senescence from G2 arrest, revisited.

Authors:  Véronique Gire; Vjekoslav Dulic
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Interchromosomal homology searches drive directional ALT telomere movement and synapsis.

Authors:  Nam Woo Cho; Robert L Dilley; Michael A Lampson; Roger A Greenberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  DUB-resistant ubiquitin to survey ubiquitination switches in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Miklós Békés; Keiji Okamoto; Sarah B Crist; Mathew J Jones; Jessica R Chapman; Bradley B Brasher; Francesco D Melandri; Beatrix M Ueberheide; Eros Lazzerini Denchi; Tony T Huang
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Disruption of direct 3D telomere-TRF2 interaction through two molecularly disparate mechanisms is a hallmark of primary Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells.

Authors:  Hans Knecht; Nathalie A Johnson; Tina Haliotis; Daniel Lichtensztejn; Sabine Mai
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 10.  The long and the short of TRF2 in neurogenesis.

Authors:  Ioannis Grammatikakis; Peisu Zhang; Mark P Mattson; Myriam Gorospe
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.