Literature DB >> 22573881

Ethical questions must be considered for electronic health records.

Merle Spriggs1, Michael V Arnold, Christopher M Pearce, Craig Fry.   

Abstract

National electronic health record initiatives are in progress in many countries around the world but the debate about the ethical issues and how they are to be addressed remains overshadowed by other issues. The discourse to which all others are answerable is a technical discourse, even where matters of privacy and consent are concerned. Yet a focus on technical issues and a failure to think about ethics are cited as factors in the failure of the UK health record system. In this paper, while the prime concern is the Australian Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR), the discussion is relevant to and informed by the international context. The authors draw attention to ethical and conceptual issues that have implications for the success or failure of electronic health records systems. Important ethical issues to consider as Australia moves towards a PCEHR system include: issues of equity that arise in the context of personal control, who benefits and who should pay, what are the legitimate uses of PCEHRs, and how we should implement privacy. The authors identify specific questions that need addressing.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22573881     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  10 in total

1.  Sharing my health data: a survey of data sharing preferences of healthy individuals.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Bell; Lucila Ohno-Machado; M Adela Grando
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

2.  How bioethics principles can aid design of electronic health records to accommodate patient granular control.

Authors:  Eric M Meslin; Peter H Schwartz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  A personally controlled electronic health record for Australia.

Authors:  Christopher Pearce; Michael Bainbridge
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Contemporary views of dental practitioners' on patient safety.

Authors:  E Bailey
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Improving quality of care and long-term health outcomes through continuity of care with the use of an electronic or paper patient-held portable health file (COMMUNICATE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marissa Nichole Lassere; Sue Baker; Andrew Parle; Anthony Sara; Kent Robert Johnson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  'I'd like to think you could trust the government, but I don't really think we can': Australian women's attitudes to and experiences of My Health Record.

Authors:  Deborah Lupton
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2019-04-29

7.  The anatomy of electronic patient record ethics: a framework to guide design, development, implementation, and use.

Authors:  Tim Jacquemard; Colin P Doherty; Mary B Fitzsimons
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Patient-centred care and patient autonomy: doctors' views in Chinese hospitals.

Authors:  Zhanming Liang; Min Xu; Guowei Liu; Yongli Zhou; Peter Howard
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  eRegistries: governance for electronic maternal and child health registries.

Authors:  Sonja L Myhre; Jane Kaye; Lee A Bygrave; Margunn Aanestad; Buthaina Ghanem; Patricia Mechael; J Frederik Frøen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Examination and diagnosis of electronic patient records and their associated ethics: a scoping literature review.

Authors:  Tim Jacquemard; Colin P Doherty; Mary B Fitzsimons
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.652

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.