Literature DB >> 27272134

Too Much or Too Little? How Much Control Should Patients Have Over EHR Data?

Soumitra Sudip Bhuyan1, Sandra Bailey-DeLeeuw2, David K Wyant3, Cyril F Chang4.   

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) have been promoted as a mechanism to overcome the fragmented healthcare system in the United States. The challenge that is being discussed is the rights of the patient to control the access to their EHRs' data and the needs of healthcare professionals to know health data to make the best treatment decisions for their patients. The Federal Trade Commission has asked those who store consumer information to comply with the Fair Information Practice Principles. In the EHR context, these principles give the rights to the patient to control who can see their health data and what components of the data are restricted from view. Control is not limited to patients, as it also includes parents of adolescent children. We suggest that the ongoing policy discussion include consideration of the precise questions patients will be asked when a need for data sharing arises. Further, patients should understand the relative risks that they face, and the degree to which their decisions will (or will not) significantly reduce the risk of a data breach. As various approaches are considered, it is important to address the relative resource requirements and the associated costs of each option.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consumer health information; Data ownership; Data sharing; Electronic health records; Patient data privacy; Patient privacy; Patient rights; Privacy of patient data

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27272134     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-016-0533-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  6 in total

1.  Data breaches of protected health information in the United States.

Authors:  Vincent Liu; Mark A Musen; Timothy Chou
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Giving patients control of their EHR data.

Authors:  David Blumenthal; David Squires
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Designing a system for patients controlling providers' access to their electronic health records: organizational and technical challenges.

Authors:  Jeremy C Leventhal; Jonathan A Cummins; Peter H Schwartz; Douglas K Martin; William M Tierney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Point and counterpoint: patient control of access to data in their electronic health records.

Authors:  Kelly Caine; William M Tierney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  What 'patient-centered' should mean: confessions of an extremist.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  The double-edged sword of electronic health records: implications for patient disclosure.

Authors:  Celeste Campos-Castillo; Denise L Anthony
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.497

  6 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Transforming Healthcare Cybersecurity from Reactive to Proactive: Current Status and Future Recommendations.

Authors:  Soumitra Sudip Bhuyan; Umar Y Kabir; Jessica M Escareno; Kenya Ector; Sandeep Palakodeti; David Wyant; Sajeesh Kumar; Marian Levy; Satish Kedia; Dipankar Dasgupta; Aram Dobalian
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  The anatomy of electronic patient record ethics: a framework to guide design, development, implementation, and use.

Authors:  Tim Jacquemard; Colin P Doherty; Mary B Fitzsimons
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Examination and diagnosis of electronic patient records and their associated ethics: a scoping literature review.

Authors:  Tim Jacquemard; Colin P Doherty; Mary B Fitzsimons
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.