Literature DB >> 23483171

Improving the electronic health record--are clinicians getting what they wished for?

James J Cimino1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23483171      PMCID: PMC3858675          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  A piece of my mind. Copy-and-paste.

Authors:  Robert E Hirschtick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Higher-complexity ED billing codes--sicker patients, more intensive practice, or improper payments?

Authors:  Stephen R Pitts
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Clinical documentation: composition or synthesis?

Authors:  Lena Mamykina; David K Vawdrey; Peter D Stetson; Kai Zheng; George Hripcsak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Medical records that guide and teach.

Authors:  L L Weed
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1968-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The computer-based clinical record--where do we stand?

Authors:  G O Barnett; R A Jenders; H C Chueh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors.

Authors:  C R Weir; J F Hurdle; M A Felgar; J M Hoffman; B Roth; J R Nebeker
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.176

7.  A piece of my mind. John Lennon's elbow.

Authors:  Robert E Hirschtick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 56.272

  7 in total
  31 in total

1.  Data integration of structured and unstructured sources for assigning clinical codes to patient stays.

Authors:  Elyne Scheurwegs; Kim Luyckx; Léon Luyten; Walter Daelemans; Tim Van den Bulcke
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  An analysis of free-text alcohol use documentation in the electronic health record: early findings and implications.

Authors:  Es Chen; M Garcia-Webb
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Accuracy and completeness of electronic medical records obtained from referring physicians in a Hamilton, Ontario, plastic surgery practice: A prospective feasibility study.

Authors:  Chris Joon Hong; Manraj Nirmal Kaur; Forough Farrokhyar; Achilleas Thoma
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

4.  Using electronic health records for clinical trials: Where do we stand and where can we go?

Authors:  Kimberly A Mc Cord; Lars G Hemkens
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  What are they trying to do?: An analysis of Action Identities in using electronic documentation in an EHR.

Authors:  Charlene R Weir; Catherine Staes; Stacey Slager; Teresa Taft; Valiammai Chidambaram; Heidi Kramer; Bruce E Bray; Seneca Perri Moore
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

6.  Applying User Input to the Design and Testing of an Electronic Behavioral Health Information System for Wraparound Care Coordination.

Authors:  Eric J Bruns; Kelly L Hyde; April Sather; Alyssa N Hook; Aaron R Lyon
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-05

7.  Healthcare information technology's relativity problems: a typology of how patients' physical reality, clinicians' mental models, and healthcare information technology differ.

Authors:  Sean W Smith; Ross Koppel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  A review of the role of electronic health record in genomic research.

Authors:  Parasuram Krishnamoorthy; Deepansh Gupta; Saurav Chatterjee; Jessica Huston; John J Ryan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Point and counterpoint: patient control of access to data in their electronic health records.

Authors:  Kelly Caine; William M Tierney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Electronic medical records and quality of cancer care.

Authors:  Thomas R Klumpp
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.