Literature DB >> 25477228

RespOnse Shift ALgorithm in Item response theory (ROSALI) for response shift detection with missing data in longitudinal patient-reported outcome studies.

Alice Guilleux1, Myriam Blanchin, Antoine Vanier, Francis Guillemin, Bruno Falissard, Carolyn E Schwartz, Jean-Benoit Hardouin, Véronique Sébille.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Some IRT models have the advantage of being robust to missing data and thus can be used with complete data as well as different patterns of missing data (informative or not). The purpose of this paper was to develop an algorithm for response shift (RS) detection using IRT models allowing for non-uniform and uniform recalibration, reprioritization RS recognition and true change estimation with these forms of RS taken into consideration if appropriate.
METHODS: The algorithm is described, and its implementation is shown and compared to Oort's structural equation modeling (SEM) procedure using data from a clinical study assessing health-related quality of life in 669 hospitalized patients with chronic conditions.
RESULTS: The results were quite different for the two methods. Both showed that some items of the SF-36 General Health subscale were affected by response shift, but those items usually differed between IRT and SEM. The IRT algorithm found evidence of small recalibration and reprioritization effects, whereas SEM mostly found evidence of small recalibration effects.
CONCLUSION: An algorithm has been developed for response shift analyses using IRT models and allows the investigation of non-uniform and uniform recalibration as well as reprioritization. Differences in RS detection between IRT and SEM may be due to differences between the two methods in handling missing data. However, one cannot conclude on the differences between IRT and SEM based on a single application on a dataset since the underlying truth is unknown. A next step would be to implement a simulation study to investigate those differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25477228     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0876-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  12 in total

Review 1.  Rating scales and Rasch measurement.

Authors:  David Andrich
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change.

Authors:  Frans J Oort
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The French SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation and preliminary psychometric evaluation.

Authors:  A Leplège; E Ecosse; A Verdier; T V Perneger
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Assessment of score- and Rasch-based methods for group comparison of longitudinal patient-reported outcomes with intermittent missing data (informative and non-informative).

Authors:  Élodie de Bock; Jean-Benoit Hardouin; Myriam Blanchin; Tanguy Le Neel; Gildas Kubis; Véronique Sébille
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Sequential analysis of latent variables using mixed-effect latent variable models: Impact of non-informative and informative missing data.

Authors:  Véronique Sébille; Jean-Benoit Hardouin; Mounir Mesbah
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Imputation by the mean score should be avoided when validating a Patient Reported Outcomes questionnaire by a Rasch model in presence of informative missing data.

Authors:  Jean-Benoit Hardouin; Ronán Conroy; Véronique Sébille
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  The king's foot of patient-reported outcomes: current practices and new developments for the measurement of change.

Authors:  Richard J Swartz; Carolyn Schwartz; Ethan Basch; Li Cai; Diane L Fairclough; Lori McLeod; Tito R Mendoza; Bruce Rapkin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Biases and power for groups comparison on subjective health measurements.

Authors:  Jean-François Hamel; Jean-Benoit Hardouin; Tanguy Le Neel; Gildas Kubis; Yves Roquelaure; Véronique Sébille
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The relationship between traits optimism and anxiety and health-related quality of life in patients hospitalized for chronic diseases: data from the SATISQOL study.

Authors:  Sabrina Kepka; Cédric Baumann; Amélie Anota; Gaelle Buron; Elisabeth Spitz; Pascal Auquier; Francis Guillemin; Mariette Mercier
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  20 in total

1.  How recent health-related life events affected my perspective on quality-of-life research.

Authors:  Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Response shift in the presence of missing data.

Authors:  D L Fairclough
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Method variation in the impact of missing data on response shift detection.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Tolulope T Sajobi; Mathilde G E Verdam; Veronique Sebille; Lisa M Lix; Alice Guilleux; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Introduction to special section on response shift at the item level.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Scoping review of response shift methods: current reporting practices and recommendations.

Authors:  Tolulope T Sajobi; Ronak Brahmbatt; Lisa M Lix; Bruno D Zumbo; Richard Sawatzky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  A systematic review of the quality of reporting of simulation studies about methods for the analysis of complex longitudinal patient-reported outcomes data.

Authors:  Aynslie M Hinds; Tolulope T Sajobi; Véronique Sebille; Richard Sawatzky; Lisa M Lix
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Letter to editor regarding "RespOnse Shift ALgorithm in Item response theory (ROSALI) for response shift detection with missing data in longitudinal patient-reported outcome studies".

Authors:  Heather J Gunn
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  An item-level response shift study on the change of health state with the rating of asthma-specific quality of life: a report from the PROMIS(®) Pediatric Asthma Study.

Authors:  Pranav K Gandhi; Carolyn E Schwartz; Bryce B Reeve; Darren A DeWalt; Heather E Gross; I-Chan Huang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  The Guttman errors as a tool for response shift detection at subgroup and item levels.

Authors:  Myriam Blanchin; Véronique Sébille; Alice Guilleux; Jean-Benoit Hardouin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Response shift and disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Lisa M Lix; Eric K H Chan; Richard Sawatzky; Tolulope T Sajobi; Juxin Liu; Wilma Hopman; Nancy Mayo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.