Literature DB >> 21958102

Rating scales and Rasch measurement.

David Andrich1.   

Abstract

Assessments with ratings in ordered categories have become ubiquitous in health, biological and social sciences. Ratings are used when a measuring instrument of the kind found in the natural sciences is not available to assess some property in terms of degree - for example, greater or smaller, better or worse, or stronger or weaker. The handling of ratings has ranged from the very elementary to the highly sophisticated. In an elementary form, and assumed in classical test theory, the ratings are scored with successive integers and treated as measurements; in a sophisticated form, and used in modern test theory, the ratings are characterized by probabilistic response models with parameters for persons and the rating categories. Within modern test theory, two paradigms, similar in many details but incompatible on crucial points, have emerged. For the purposes of this article, these are termed the statistical modeling and experimental measurement paradigms. Rather than reviewing a compendium of available methods and models for analyzing ratings in detail, the article focuses on the incompatible differences between these two paradigms, with implications for choice of model and inferences. It shows that the differences have implications for different roles for substantive researchers and psychometricians in designing instruments with rating scales. To illustrate these differences, an example is provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21958102     DOI: 10.1586/erp.11.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  58 in total

1.  Further validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) in the UK veterinary profession: Rasch analysis.

Authors:  David J Bartram; Julia M Sinclair; David S Baldwin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Rasch analysis of clinical outcome measures in spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Stefan J Cano; Anna Mayhew; Allan M Glanzman; Kristin J Krosschell; Kathryn J Swoboda; Marion Main; Birgit F Steffensen; Carole Bérard; Françoise Girardot; Christine A M Payan; Eugenio Mercuri; Elena Mazzone; Bakri Elsheikh; Julaine Florence; Linda S Hynan; Susan T Iannaccone; Leslie L Nelson; Shree Pandya; Michael Rose; Charles Scott; Reza Sadjadi; Mackensie A Yore; Cynthia Joyce; John T Kissel
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  FACE-Q Skin Cancer Module for measuring patient-reported outcomes following facial skin cancer surgery.

Authors:  E H Lee; A F Klassen; S J Cano; K S Nehal; A L Pusic
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 9.302

4.  THE DEPRESSION INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT SCALE: Assessment of Psychometric Properties Using Classical and Modern Measurement Theory in a CAN-BIND Trial.

Authors:  Anthony L Vaccarino; Amir H Kalali; Pierre Blier; Susan Gilbert Evans; Nina Engelhardt; Jane A Foster; Benicio N Frey; John H Greist; Kenneth A Kobak; Raymond W Lam; Glenda MacQueen; Roumen Milev; Daniel J Müller; Sagar V Parikh; Franca M Placenza; Sakina J Rizvi; Susan Rotzinger; David V Sheehan; Terrence Sills; Claudio N Soares; Gustavo Turecki; Rudolph Uher; Janet B W Williams; Sidney H Kennedy; Kenneth R Evans
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-01

5.  Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Edwin G Wilkins; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry and Changes in Quality of Life of Glaucoma Patients: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Ricardo Y Abe; Carolina P B Gracitelli; Alberto Diniz-Filho; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Psychometric findings and normative values for the CLEFT-Q based on 2434 children and young adult patients with cleft lip and/or palate from 12 countries.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Karen Wy Wong Riff; Natasha M Longmire; Asteria Albert; Gregory C Allen; Mustafa Asim Aydin; Stephen B Baker; Stefan J Cano; Andrew J Chan; Douglas J Courtemanche; Marieke M Dreise; Jesse A Goldstein; Timothy E E Goodacre; Karen E Harman; Montserrat Munill; Aisling O Mahony; Mirta Palomares Aguilera; Petra Peterson; Andrea L Pusic; Rona Slator; Mia Stiernman; Elena Tsangaris; Sunil S Tholpady; Federico Vargas; Christopher R Forrest
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Longitudinal changes in quality of life and rates of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Carolina P B Gracitelli; Erwin R Boer; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill; Peter N Rosen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Is the Give Youth a Voice questionnaire an appropriate measure of teen-centred care in paediatric oncology: a Rasch measurement theory analysis.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Stefan J Cano; Roona Sinha; Areej Shahbaz; Robert Klaassen; David Dix
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Development and Validation of the BREAST-Q Breast-Conserving Therapy Module.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Laura Dominici; Sarah Fuzesi; Stefan J Cano; Dunya Atisha; Tracie Locklear; Madelijn L Gregorowitsch; Elena Tsangaris; Monica Morrow; Tari King; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.