Literature DB >> 25471972

Image reconstructions from super-sampled data sets with resolution modeling in PET imaging.

Yusheng Li1, Samuel Matej1, Scott D Metzler1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Spatial resolution in positron emission tomography (PET) is still a limiting factor in many imaging applications. To improve the spatial resolution for an existing scanner with fixed crystal sizes, mechanical movements such as scanner wobbling and object shifting have been considered for PET systems. Multiple acquisitions from different positions can provide complementary information and increased spatial sampling. The objective of this paper is to explore an efficient and useful reconstruction framework to reconstruct super-resolution images from super-sampled low-resolution data sets.
METHODS: The authors introduce a super-sampling data acquisition model based on the physical processes with tomographic, downsampling, and shifting matrices as its building blocks. Based on the model, we extend the MLEM and Landweber algorithms to reconstruct images from super-sampled data sets. The authors also derive a backprojection-filtration-like (BPF-like) method for the super-sampling reconstruction. Furthermore, they explore variant methods for super-sampling reconstructions: the separate super-sampling resolution-modeling reconstruction and the reconstruction without downsampling to further improve image quality at the cost of more computation. The authors use simulated reconstruction of a resolution phantom to evaluate the three types of algorithms with different super-samplings at different count levels.
RESULTS: Contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) versus background variability, as an image-quality metric, is calculated at each iteration for all reconstructions. The authors observe that all three algorithms can significantly and consistently achieve increased CRCs at fixed background variability and reduce background artifacts with super-sampled data sets at the same count levels. For the same super-sampled data sets, the MLEM method achieves better image quality than the Landweber method, which in turn achieves better image quality than the BPF-like method. The authors also demonstrate that the reconstructions from super-sampled data sets using a fine system matrix yield improved image quality compared to the reconstructions using a coarse system matrix. Super-sampling reconstructions with different count levels showed that the more spatial-resolution improvement can be obtained with higher count at a larger iteration number.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors developed a super-sampling reconstruction framework that can reconstruct super-resolution images using the super-sampling data sets simultaneously with known acquisition motion. The super-sampling PET acquisition using the proposed algorithms provides an effective and economic way to improve image quality for PET imaging, which has an important implication in preclinical and clinical region-of-interest PET imaging applications.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25471972      PMCID: PMC4257959          DOI: 10.1118/1.4901552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  22 in total

1.  PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard.

Authors:  Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Joel S Karp; Michael E Casey; Frank P DiFilippo; Horace Hines; Gerd Muehllehner; Vilim Simcic; Charles W Stearns; Lars-Eric Adam; Steve Kohlmyer; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  A filtered backprojection algorithm with characteristics of the iterative landweber algorithm.

Authors:  Gengsheng L Zeng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  High-resolution PET detector design: modelling components of intrinsic spatial resolution.

Authors:  Jennifer R Stickel; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: I. Theory.

Authors:  H H Barrett; D W Wilson; B M Tsui
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Super-resolution in PET imaging.

Authors:  John A Kennedy; Ora Israel; Alex Frenkel; Rachel Bar-Shalom; Haim Azhari
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Accelerating the EMML algorithm and related iterative algorithms by rescaled block-iterative methods.

Authors:  C L Byrne
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 10.856

7.  Sinogram-based super-resolution in PET.

Authors:  Kye Young Jeong; Kyuha Choi; Woo Hyun Nam; Jong Beom Ra
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Modeling and incorporation of system response functions in 3-D whole body PET.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan; Thomas K Lewellen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Resolution Enhancement in PET Reconstruction Using Collimation.

Authors:  Scott D Metzler; Samuel Matej; Joel S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.679

10.  Improvement of the spatial resolution of the MicroPET R4 scanner by wobbling the bed.

Authors:  Joon Young Suk; Christopher J Thompson; Aleks Labuda; Andrew L Goertzen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  3 in total

1.  Noise-Weighted FBP Algorithm for Uniformly Attenuated SPECT Projections.

Authors:  Gengsheng L Zeng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 1.679

2.  LOR-interleaving image reconstruction for PET imaging with fractional-crystal collimation.

Authors:  Yusheng Li; Samuel Matej; Joel S Karp; Scott D Metzler
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Practical joint reconstruction of activity and attenuation with autonomous scaling for time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Yusheng Li; Samuel Matej; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.609

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.