Literature DB >> 2546969

Clinical experience with cytomegalovirus isolation using conventional cell cultures and early antigen detection in centrifugation-enhanced shell vial cultures.

D S Leland1, R L Hansing, M L French.   

Abstract

A total of 1,915 clinical samples was inoculated by low-speed centrifugation into shell vials (Bartels Immunodiagnostics, Bellvue, Wash.) containing cover slip monolayers of MRC-5 fibroblasts. At 1 and 2 days postinoculation, one cover slip was stained by an indirect immunofluorescence technique using a monoclonal antibody (Biotech Research Laboratories for Dupont, Billerica, Mass.) to cytomegalovirus (CMV) early antigen (EA). Clinical samples were also inoculated into three MRC-5 or MRHF cell cultures which were observed for 30 days for the appearance of a cytopathic effect (CPE). Of 157 CMV-positive samples, 92 (59%) were identified by centrifugation-enhanced EA (CE-EA) and 131 (83%) produced a CPE. CE-EA was less sensitive than CPE for all types of samples, although 17% of CMV-positive samples were detected by CE-EA alone. Evaluation of the CMV status of patients with CE-EA-positive-CPE-negative samples indicated that these samples likely represented true CMV-positive results. The average elapsed time between culture inoculation and identification of CMV decreased as follows when both CE-EA and CPE, rather than CPE alone, were used: urines, 15 to 7 days; buffy coats, 18 to 9 days; lung samples, 13 to 8 days; throat samples, 18 to 7 days. Although CE-EA was less sensitive than 30-day cell culture, both CE-EA and CPE were identified as valuable in CMV detection, and neither could be discontinued without a decrease in the CMV isolation rate or an increase in the turnaround time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2546969      PMCID: PMC267519          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1159-1162.1989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  9 in total

1.  Detection of cytomegalovirus infections in specimens other than urine by the shell vial assay and conventional tube cell cultures.

Authors:  C V Paya; A D Wold; T F Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of a direct fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibody for detection of cytomegalovirus in centrifugation culture.

Authors:  C A Gleaves; C F Lee; L Kirsch; J D Meyers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of standard tube and shell vial cell culture techniques for the detection of cytomegalovirus in clinical specimens.

Authors:  C A Gleaves; T F Smith; E A Shuster; G R Pearson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Rapid detection of human cytomegalovirus in the urine of humans.

Authors:  G Alpert; M C Mazeron; R Colimon; S Plotkin
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Rapid detection of cytomegalovirus in MRC-5 cells inoculated with urine specimens by using low-speed centrifugation and monoclonal antibody to an early antigen.

Authors:  C A Gleaves; T F Smith; E A Shuster; G R Pearson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of number of shell vial cell cultures per clinical specimen for rapid diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection.

Authors:  C V Paya; A D Wold; D M Ilstrup; T F Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Use of monoclonal antibodies for the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection by the detection of early antigen fluorescent foci (DEAFF) in cell culture.

Authors:  P R Stirk; P D Griffiths
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.327

8.  Rapid detection of cytomegalovirus in clinical specimens by immunofluorescent staining of shell vial cultures.

Authors:  P C DeGirolami; J Dakos; K Eichelberger; L S Mills; A M DeLuca
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  Monoclonal antibody for rapid laboratory detection of cytomegalovirus infections: characterization and diagnostic application.

Authors:  E A Shuster; J S Beneke; G E Tegtmeier; G R Pearson; C A Gleaves; A D Wold; T F Smith
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 7.616

  9 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Role of cell culture for virus detection in the age of technology.

Authors:  Diane S Leland; Christine C Ginocchio
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Comparison of two leukocyte extraction methods for cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay.

Authors:  A García; J Niubò; M A Benítez; M Viqueira; J L Pérez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Physical and chemical methods for enhancing rapid detection of viruses and other agents.

Authors:  J H Hughes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Comparison of cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay with shell vial-indirect immunofluorescence assay for rapid detection of cytomegalovirus in blood.

Authors:  S M Lipson; Z Ciamician; M H Kaplan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Effects of enhancing agents on detection of cytomegalovirus in clinical specimens.

Authors:  K St George; C R Rinaldo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Quantification of human cytomegalovirus viremia by using monoclonal antibodies to different viral proteins.

Authors:  G Gerna; M G Revello; E Percivalle; M Zavattoni; M Parea; M Battaglia
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Enhanced recovery of cytomegalovirus in conventional tube cultures with a spin-amplified adsorption.

Authors:  P E Oefinger; R M Shawar; S H Loo; L T Tsai; J K Arnett
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Viral infections in severely immunocompromised cancer patients.

Authors:  S M Devine; J R Wingard
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Application of PCR to multiple specimen types for diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection: comparison with cell culture and shell vial assay.

Authors:  M J Miller; S Bovey; K Pado; D A Bruckner; E A Wagar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.