Literature DB >> 3034962

Detection of cytomegalovirus infections in specimens other than urine by the shell vial assay and conventional tube cell cultures.

C V Paya, A D Wold, T F Smith.   

Abstract

Blood, bronchoscopy-lavage, biopsy (lung, liver, kidney), sputum, and other (cecum, bone) specimens were inoculated into shell vials and conventional cell tube cultures seeded with MRC-5 cells over a 23-month period. Of 1,472 specimens, 182 (12.4%) yielded cytomegalovirus (CMV)-positive results from 81 patients. Significantly more CMV-positive specimens were detected in shell vials (n = 154; 84.6%) than in conventional tube cell cultures (n = 126; 69.2%) (P less than 0.01). We found that 98 (53.8%) of the total 182 and 41 (42.7%) of the 96 blood specimens positive for CMV were detected by both the shell vial assay and conventional tube cell cultures. However, 56 (30.7%) of the total 182 and 31 (32.3%) of the 96 blood specimens positive for CMV were obtained exclusively in shell vials after detection with monoclonal antibody. Alternatively, 28 (15.4%) of the total 182 and 24 (25%) of the 96 blood specimens positive for the virus were isolated only in conventional tube cell cultures. Thus, although the shell vial assay was more sensitive and rapid than the conventional tube cell culture method, both systems must be used, especially for blood specimens, for the laboratory diagnosis of CMV infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3034962      PMCID: PMC266083          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.25.5.755-757.1987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of rates of virus isolation from leukocyte populations separated from blood by conventional and Ficoll-Paque/Macrodex methods.

Authors:  C L Howell; M J Miller; W J Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of standard tube and shell vial cell culture techniques for the detection of cytomegalovirus in clinical specimens.

Authors:  C A Gleaves; T F Smith; E A Shuster; G R Pearson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Rapid detection of cytomegalovirus in bronchoalveolar lavage specimens by a monoclonal antibody method.

Authors:  W J Martin; T F Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Diagnosis of cytomegaloviral pneumonia by in situ hybridization.

Authors:  D Myerson; R C Hackman; J D Meyers
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Rapid detection of cytomegalovirus in MRC-5 cells inoculated with urine specimens by using low-speed centrifugation and monoclonal antibody to an early antigen.

Authors:  C A Gleaves; T F Smith; E A Shuster; G R Pearson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Rapid immunodiagnosis of cytomegalovirus pneumonia by bronchoalveolar lavage using human and murine monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  D Emanuel; J Peppard; D Stover; J Gold; D Armstrong; U Hammerling
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Cytomegalovirus disease in renal allograft recipients: a prospective study of the clinical features, risk factors and impact on renal transplantation.

Authors:  P K Peterson; H H Balfour; S C Marker; D S Fryd; R J Howard; R L Simmons
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Monoclonal antibody for rapid laboratory detection of cytomegalovirus infections: characterization and diagnostic application.

Authors:  E A Shuster; J S Beneke; G E Tegtmeier; G R Pearson; C A Gleaves; A D Wold; T F Smith
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Activity of 9-[2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)ethoxymethyl]guanine in the treatment of cytomegalovirus pneumonia.

Authors:  D H Shepp; P S Dandliker; P de Miranda; T C Burnette; D M Cederberg; L E Kirk; J D Meyers
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Rapid detection and quantitation of human cytomegalovirus in urine through DNA hybridization.

Authors:  S Chou; T C Merigan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-04-21       Impact factor: 91.245

  10 in total
  41 in total

1.  Role of the laboratory in diagnosis and management of cytomegalovirus infection in hematopoietic stem cell and solid-organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Raymund R Razonable; Carlos V Paya; Thomas F Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Detection of human cytomegalovirus in clinical specimens by centrifugation culture with a nonhuman cell line.

Authors:  C A Gleaves; D A Hursh; J D Meyers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Role of cell culture for virus detection in the age of technology.

Authors:  Diane S Leland; Christine C Ginocchio
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Novel real-time monitoring system for human cytomegalovirus-infected cells in vitro that uses a green fluorescent protein-PML-expressing cell line.

Authors:  T Ueno; Y Eizuru; H Katano; T Kurata; T Sata; S Irie; K Ogawa-Goto
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Comparison of conventional and shell vial cultures for detecting cytomegalovirus infection.

Authors:  N Rabella; W L Drew
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of PCR primers for early diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection following liver transplantation.

Authors:  J C Mendez; M J Espy; T F Smith; J A Wilson; C V Paya
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of culture and the antigenemia assay for detection of cytomegalovirus in blood specimens submitted to a reference laboratory.

Authors:  B G Brumback; S N Bolejack; M V Morris; C Mohla; T E Shutzbank
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Multisite evaluation of a monoclonal antibody reagent (Syva) for rapid diagnosis of cytomegalovirus in the shell vial assay.

Authors:  D J Jespersen; W L Drew; C A Gleaves; J D Meyers; A L Warford; T F Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Double-label immunofluorescence method for simultaneous detection of adenovirus and herpes simplex virus from the eye.

Authors:  P Walpita; S Darougar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Continuous high-speed rolling versus centrifugation for detection of herpes simplex virus.

Authors:  J H Hughes; V V Hamparian; C T Mavromoustakis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.