| Literature DB >> 25467604 |
Marina Cretenet, Gwenaëlle Le Gall, Udo Wegmann, Sergine Even, Claire Shearman, Régis Stentz, Sophie Jeanson1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lactococcus lactis is the most used species in the dairy industry. Its ability to adapt to technological stresses, such as oxidative stress encountered during stirring in the first stages of the cheese-making process, is a key factor to measure its technological performance. This study aimed to understand the response to oxidative stress of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363 at the transcriptional and metabolic levels in relation to acidification kinetics and growth conditions, especially at an early stage of growth. For those purposes, conditions of hyper-oxygenation were initially fixed for the fermentation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25467604 PMCID: PMC4289295 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1ssp. strain MG1363 + pLP712 plasmid cultivated in LM17 at 30°C under O2 condition (black lines) and N2 condition (grey lines) for [1.] dissolved oxygen concentration (—) and redox evolution (−−−), for [2.] growth kinetics: enumerations (—) and OD (−−−) and for [3.] acidification kinetics. Values are means of biological independent triplicates (n = 3) and bars represent the standard deviations.
Genes over- and under-expressed under oxygen conditions (condition O2) for the strain MG1363
| NomSpot | COG number | COG functional categories |
|
| 1 h | 5 h | 8 h |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| llmg_1464 | COG3527 | Q |
|
| 4.59 | ||
| llmg_1309 | COG0028 | EH |
|
| 3.64 | ||
| llmg_1700 | COG4608 | E |
|
| 3.21 | ||
| llmg_1699 | COG1732 | M |
|
| 3.61 | ||
| llmg_1737 | COG0596 | R |
|
| 2.27 | ||
| llmg_0346 | COG1118 | P |
|
| 4.28 | ||
| llmg_0349 | COG0614 | P |
|
| 5.67 | ||
| llmg_0348 | COG0609 | P |
|
| 4.15 | ||
| llmg_1702 | COG1249 | C |
|
| 3.00 | ||
| llmg_0274 |
|
| 4.67 | ||||
| llmg_0276 | COG0656 | R |
|
| 3.52 | ||
| llmg_0281 | COG1328 | F |
|
| 6.11 | ||
| llmg_2143 | COG1302 | S |
|
| 3.24 | ||
| llmg_2144 |
|
| 5.30 | ||||
| llmg_2145 |
|
| 5.27 | ||||
| llmg_0075 | COG0095 | H |
|
| 8.38 | ||
| llmg_1828 | COG1169 | HQ |
|
| 2.69 | ||
| llmg_0951 | COG0225 | O |
|
| 2.52 | ||
| llmg_1970 | COG0822 | C |
|
| 4.33 | ||
| llmg_0408 | COG0446 | R |
|
| 22.93 | ||
| llmg_1543 | COG0209 | F |
|
| 16.70 | ||
| llmg_1544 | COG0208 | F |
|
| 5.63 | ||
| llmg_0282 | COG0602 | O |
|
| 4.30 | ||
| llmg_1541 | COG0695 | O |
|
| 10.25 | ||
| llmg_1542 | COG0716 | C |
|
| 12.93 | ||
| llmg_0074 | COG1071 | C |
|
| 5.96 | ||
| llmg_0073 | COG0022 | C |
|
| 5.03 | ||
| llmg_0072 | COG0508 | C |
|
| 5.65 | ||
| llmg_0071 | COG1249 | C |
|
| 2.84 | ||
| llmg_0629 | COG1882 | C |
|
| 2.97 | ||
| llmg_0318 | COG2077 | O |
|
| 4.18 | ||
| llmg_0776 | COG0492 | O |
|
| 4.28 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| llmg_2432 | COG1012 | C |
|
| −7.45 | ||
| llmg_0100 | COG2217 | P |
|
| −4.06 | ||
| llmg_1865 | COG3104 | E |
|
| −2.11 | ||
| llmg_0758 | COG0038 | P |
|
| −2.04 | ||
| llmg_1551 | COG2116 | P |
|
| −2.76 | ||
| llmg_1441 | COG1053 | C |
|
| −4.24 | ||
| llmg_0993 | COG0634 | F |
|
| −2.01 | ||
| llmg_1915 | COG0247 | C |
|
| −3.61 | ||
| llmg_0447 | COG0674 | C |
|
| −11.19 | ||
| llmg_1514 | COG2344 | R |
|
| −2.73 | ||
| llmg_0640 | COG1393 | P |
|
| −2.15 | ||
| llmg_0429 | COG0605 | P |
|
| −3.08 | ||
| llmg_1362 |
|
| −2.28 | ||||
| llmg_1376 | COG4227 | L |
|
| −2.61 | ||
| llmg_1377 |
|
| −2.09 | ||||
| llmg_1378 |
|
| −2.10 | ||||
| llmg_1379 | COG2856 | E |
|
| −2.06 | ||
| llmg_1384 |
|
| −2.11 | ||||
| llmg_1387 | COG5179 | K |
|
| −2.12 | ||
| llmg_1399 |
|
| −2.37 | ||||
| llmg_1402 |
|
| −2.03 |
Fold-changes of selected differentially expressed genes of the strain MG1363 in O2 condition in comparison with N2 condition, from a whole-genome microarray analysis (n = 3). Genes were significantly (p-value < 0.5) differentially expressed with a FDR < 0.5 and a |fold-change| > 2. Top table is over-expressed genes; bottom table is under-expressed genes. Under-expressed genes; the ninth last genes are involved in the conjugation.
Figure 2Gene expression of strain MG1363: differentially expressed genes (over- and under-expressed), in O2 condition in comparison to N2 condition grouped by COG categories (letters) at 1 h, 5 h, 8 h of culture in LM17 at 30°C. COG categories: Information storage and processing = > J “Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis”, K “Transcription”, L “DNA replication, recombination and repair”; Cellular processes = > D “Cell division and chromosome partitioning”, O “Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones”, M “Cell envelope biogenesis, outer membrane”, P “Inorganic ion transport and metabolism”, T “Signal transduction mechanisms”, U “Intracellular trafficking and secretion”; Metabolism = > C “Energy production and conversion”, G “Carbohydrate transport and metabolism”, E “Amino acid transport and metabolism”, F “Nucleotide transport and metabolism”, H “Coenzyme metabolism”, I “Lipid metabolism”, Q “Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism”; Poorly characterized = > R “General function prediction only”, S “Function unknown”.
Gene expression confirmed using RT-qPCR under oxygen conditions (condition O2)
| Ratio of gene expression O2/N2 as determined by: | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locus tag | Gene | Gene product | Primer sequences | Transcriptome analysis | RT-qPCR | |||||
| Forward | Reverse | 1 h | 5 h | 8 h | 1 h | 5 h | 8 h | |||
| llmg_0408 | noxE | NADH oxidase | TTATGCCAAAGCAGAgGATTTT | GGAATAATTGGACGTGAACCTG | 22.9 | −3.2 | 26.7 | 2.0 | ||
| llmg_0074 | pdhA | pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component alpha subunit | AGGACGTATGGGATTCTTTGG | TTACCAAGTTGATGTCCACGAG | 6.0 | −2.3 | 7.7 | 2.8 | 4.1 | |
|
| nrdH | Glutaredoxin-like protein nrdH. | AATTGTATGCAATGCAAAATGG | ATTACAGGAGCAGCTCGAAAAC | 10.3 | 2.8 | 28.3 | 4.7 | 6.9 | |
| llmg_0776 |
| thioredoxin reductase | TGGTCTtTATGCGGCTTTTTAt | GGTAAAGATTTTGtGGcTGACC | 4.3 | 13.3 | 2.4 | |||
| llmg_2432 | adhE | alcohol-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase | GGTTCTGAAGTGACTCCATTTG | TCATAACAAACTCAGGGTCAACA | −7.5 | −8.55 | ||||
| llmg_1464 | adlC | alpha-acetolactate decarboxylase | GGCTGACCAACCTTATTTTACA | TTCaGTgATGAAATTTTGGACA | 4.6 | 3.7 | 11.8 | 2.3 | 4.8 | |
| llmg_1699 | choS | choline ABC transporter permease | TTTTGCAAGTCACaGGAATTTTT | GGaAAAATCGCATAAACAACAAG | 3.6 | 10.0 | 4.1 | 3.1 | ||
| lmg2144 | lmg2144 | conserved hypothetical protein | TtGGcGGAATaaTAGGctgt | cGTgCgtTgaAgAtAgAGACC | 5.3 | −4.3 | 9.0 | 2.7 | ||
| lmg0274 | lmg0274 | conserved hypothetical protein | CTCggTCATcGGAAAAGAAG | TTtGTaGCTTgcTGCCAGAG | 4.7 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 5.3 | ||
| llmg_0100 | cadA | cation-transporting ATPase | TTTGGCTTTAATCAGCCTTTTT | CCACCAGTAAAGTCGCAATAAT | −4.1 | 2.1 | 3.5 | |||
| llmg_0349 | fhuD | ferrichrome ABC transporter substrate binding protei | CATTAGGTGCAAATGTTGTTGG | TCAGGATTTTGAGCAATCAATTT | 5.7 | 14.8 | 2.8 | 2.5 | ||
| llmg_2050 | tuf* | translation elongation factor EF-Tu | CACTCCATTCTTCGACAACTACC | AGGCATTACCATTTCAGTTCCTT | ||||||
| llmg_0102 | parA* | chromosome partitioning protein parA. | TTcTACAgCCgATtATtGTTCGT | TGGgATtGTTTCTAAtCCAGCTA | ||||||
| llmg_0496 | hllA* | HU-like DNA-binding protein | TTCAATTGATCGGTTTTGGTACT | TCAATGCTTTACCAGCTTTGAAT | ||||||
*tuf, parA and hllA expressions were used to normalised results.
Fold-changes of differentially expressed genes, in O2 condition in comparison with N2 condition, confirmed using RT-qPCR with a p-value < 0.05 and a |fold-change| > 2 (n = 3). Genes parA, tuf and hllA were internal control genes.
Figure 3The pyruvate metabolism of . ldh: gene coding for the lactate dehydrogenase; pdhA-D: genes coding for the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; pfl: gene coding for pyruvate formate-lyase; adhE: gene coding for the acetaldehyde dehydrogenase; adhA: gene coding for the alcohol dehydrogenase; pta: gene coding for the phosphotransacetylase; ackA: gene coding for the acetate kinase, als: gene coding for catabolic and anabolic 2-acetolactate synthase; aldB-C: gene coding for the acetolactate decarboxylase; butA: gene coding for the diacetyl reductase; butB: gene coding for the acetoin reductase; noxE: gene coding for the NADH oxidase (NOX). Adapted from Oliveira et al.[29]. The blue area represents pathways up-regulated in O2 condition, and the yellow area represents pathways up-regulated in N2 condition.
Figure 4Quantitative analysis by H NMR of lactose and metabolites produced by MG1363 in LM17 under O2 condition (■) and under N2 condition ( ) over 24 hours of culture at 30°C. Points are means of concentrations in mM (n = 3) and bars are standard deviations.