Literature DB >> 25466277

Multilayer scaffolds in orthopaedic tissue engineering.

Kivanc Atesok1, M Nedim Doral2, Jon Karlsson3, Kenneth A Egol4, Laith M Jazrawi5, Paulo G Coelho6, Amaury Martinez5, Tomoyuki Matsumoto7, Brett D Owens8, Mitsuo Ochi9, Shepard R Hurwitz10,11, Anthony Atala12, Freddie H Fu13, Helen H Lu14, Scott A Rodeo15.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to summarize the recent developments in the field of tissue engineering as they relate to multilayer scaffold designs in musculoskeletal regeneration.
METHODS: Clinical and basic research studies that highlight the current knowledge and potential future applications of the multilayer scaffolds in orthopaedic tissue engineering were evaluated and the best evidence collected. Studies were divided into three main categories based on tissue types and interfaces for which multilayer scaffolds were used to regenerate: bone, osteochondral junction and tendon-to-bone interfaces.
RESULTS: In vitro and in vivo studies indicate that the use of stratified scaffolds composed of multiple layers with distinct compositions for regeneration of distinct tissue types within the same scaffold and anatomic location is feasible. This emerging tissue engineering approach has potential applications in regeneration of bone defects, osteochondral lesions and tendon-to-bone interfaces with successful basic research findings that encourage clinical applications.
CONCLUSIONS: Present data supporting the advantages of the use of multilayer scaffolds as an emerging strategy in musculoskeletal tissue engineering are promising, however, still limited. Positive impacts of the use of next generation scaffolds in orthopaedic tissue engineering can be expected in terms of decreasing the invasiveness of current grafting techniques used for reconstruction of bone and osteochondral defects, and tendon-to-bone interfaces in near future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interface tissue regeneration; Multi-lineage cell differentiation; Multilayer scaffolds; Orthopaedic tissue engineering

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25466277     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3453-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  32 in total

1.  Long-term morphology of a healing bone-tendon interface: a histological observation in the sheep model.

Authors:  R Newsham-West; H Nicholson; M Walton; P Milburn
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  The osteochondral junction and its repair via bi-phasic tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Michael Keeney; Abhay Pandit
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 3.  Augmentation of tendon-to-bone healing.

Authors:  Kivanc Atesok; Freddie H Fu; Megan R Wolf; Mitsuo Ochi; Laith M Jazrawi; M Nedim Doral; James H Lubowitz; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  The basic science of the subchondral bone.

Authors:  Henning Madry; C Niek van Dijk; Magdalena Mueller-Gerbl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Novel nano-composite multilayered biomaterial for osteochondral regeneration: a pilot clinical trial.

Authors:  Elizaveta Kon; Marco Delcogliano; Giuseppe Filardo; Maurizio Busacca; Alessandro Di Martino; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Effect of short-duration low-magnitude cyclic loading versus immobilization on tendon-bone healing after ACL reconstruction in a rat model.

Authors:  Robert H Brophy; David Kovacevic; Carl W Imhauser; Mark Stasiak; Asheesh Bedi; Alice J S Fox; Xiang-Hua Deng; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Self-setting collagen-calcium phosphate bone cement: mechanical and cellular properties.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moreau; Michael D Weir; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.396

8.  Novel nanostructured scaffold for osteochondral regeneration: pilot study in horses.

Authors:  E Kon; A Muttini; E Arcangeli; M Delcogliano; G Filardo; N Nicoli Aldini; D Pressato; R Quarto; S Zaffagnini; M Marcacci
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.963

9.  Influence of freezing rate on pore structure in freeze-dried collagen-GAG scaffolds.

Authors:  Fergal J O'Brien; Brendan A Harley; Ioannis V Yannas; Lorna Gibson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  Current medical treatment strategies concerning fracture healing.

Authors:  Stefano Giannotti; Vanna Bottai; Giacomo Dell'osso; Erica Pini; Gaia De Paola; Giulia Bugelli; Giulio Guido
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2013-05
View more
  16 in total

1.  Inverse Opal Scaffolds with Gradations in Mineral Content for Spatial Control of Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Chunlei Zhu; Jichuan Qiu; Suphannee Pongkitwitoon; Stavros Thomopoulos; Younan Xia
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 30.849

2.  Modifying the strength and strain concentration profile within collagen scaffolds using customizable arrays of poly-lactic acid fibers.

Authors:  Laura C Mozdzen; Alan Vucetic; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-10-27

Review 3.  Tissue Engineering for the Temporomandibular Joint.

Authors:  Timothy M Acri; Kyungsup Shin; Dongrim Seol; Noah Z Laird; Ino Song; Sean M Geary; Jaidev L Chakka; James A Martin; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 4.  3D Bioprinting: from Benches to Translational Applications.

Authors:  Marcel Alexander Heinrich; Wanjun Liu; Andrea Jimenez; Jingzhou Yang; Ali Akpek; Xiao Liu; Qingmeng Pi; Xuan Mu; Ning Hu; Raymond Michel Schiffelers; Jai Prakash; Jingwei Xie; Yu Shrike Zhang
Journal:  Small       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 13.281

5.  Dipyridamole Augments Three-Dimensionally Printed Bioactive Ceramic Scaffolds to Regenerate Craniofacial Bone.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso; Lukasz Witek; Jonathan M Bekisz; Luiz F Gil; Bruce N Cronstein; Roberto L Flores; Andrea Torroni; Eduardo D Rodriguez; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  Inverse Opal Scaffolds and Their Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Yu Shrike Zhang; Chunlei Zhu; Younan Xia
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 7.  Poly (lactic acid)-based biomaterials for orthopaedic regenerative engineering.

Authors:  Ganesh Narayanan; Varadraj N Vernekar; Emmanuel L Kuyinu; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 8.  Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Strategies for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Yu Shrike Zhang; Rahmi Oklu; Mehmet Remzi Dokmeci; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 6.915

9.  A Mesoscale 3D Culture System for Native and Engineered Biphasic Tissues: Application to the Osteochondral Unit.

Authors:  Irene Chiesa; Roberto Di Gesù; Kalon J Overholt; Riccardo Gottardi
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

10.  Multilayered polycaprolactone/gelatin fiber-hydrogel composite for tendon tissue engineering.

Authors:  Guang Yang; Hang Lin; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Shuting Yu; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.