Literature DB >> 21310939

Novel nano-composite multilayered biomaterial for osteochondral regeneration: a pilot clinical trial.

Elizaveta Kon1, Marco Delcogliano, Giuseppe Filardo, Maurizio Busacca, Alessandro Di Martino, Maurilio Marcacci.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in and awareness of the importance of subchondral bone, for its role in the pathogenesis of articular surface damage and for the care that should be taken when treating such damage.
PURPOSE: The objective of this pilot clinical study was to test the safety and performance of a newly developed type I collagen-hydroxyapatite nanostructured biomimetic osteochondral scaffold that aims to regenerate cartilage and subchondral bone. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: A multilayer gradient nano-composite scaffold was obtained by nucleating collagen type I fibrils with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Thirty patients (9 female, 21 male; mean age, 29.3 years) with knee chondral or osteochondral lesions were treated with scaffold implantation. Lesion size varied from 1.5 cm(2) to 6.0 cm(2). Twenty-eight patients were followed for 2 years and were clinically evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee and Tegner scores. At final follow-up, magnetic resonance imaging evaluation was performed in 24 patients, and they were evaluated with the MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) score.
RESULTS: The Tegner and International Knee Documentation Committee objective and subjective scores improved significantly from the baseline evaluation to the 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-ups. Further analysis showed a slower recovery but the same results for patients who presented with adverse events, for older patients, for patients who underwent previous surgery, and for those with patellar lesions. In contrast, a faster recovery was observed in active patients. At magnetic resonance imaging evaluation, complete filling of the cartilage and complete integration of the graft was shown in 70% of the lesions. However, the subchondral lamina and bone were considered intact in a minority of cases (7% and 47%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: This open 1-step procedure was used for the treatment of chondral and osteochondral knee defects. The present pilot study highlighted the safety and potential clinical benefit of the graded biomimetic osteochondral scaffold in promoting bone and cartilage tissue restoration by itself and with good clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results at the 2-year follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21310939     DOI: 10.1177/0363546510392711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  50 in total

Review 1.  Surgical treatment for early osteoarthritis. Part I: cartilage repair procedures.

Authors:  A H Gomoll; G Filardo; L de Girolamo; J Espregueira-Mendes; J Esprequeira-Mendes; M Marcacci; W G Rodkey; J R Steadman; R J Steadman; S Zaffagnini; E Kon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Short-term outcome of the second generation characterized chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of cartilage lesions in the knee.

Authors:  A A M Dhollander; P C M Verdonk; S Lambrecht; R Verdonk; D Elewaut; G Verbruggen; K F Almqvist
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee with a biomimetic scaffold. A prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Marco Delcogliano; Amerigo Menghi; Giacomo Placella; Andrea Speziali; Giuliano Cerulli; Giulia Carimati; Stefano Pasqualotto; Massimo Berruto
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-08-01

Review 4.  Unlike bone, cartilage regeneration remains elusive.

Authors:  Daniel J Huey; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The use of a prosthetic inlay resurfacing as a salvage procedure for a failed cartilage repair.

Authors:  Aad Alfons Maria Dhollander; Karl Fredrik Almqvist; Kris Moens; Pieter-Jan Vandekerckhove; René Verdonk; Peter Verdonk; Jan Victor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Tissue Engineering in Orthopaedics.

Authors:  Alexander M Tatara; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Densities When Injected as Suspension in Joints with Osteochondral Defects.

Authors:  Elhussein Elbadry Mahmoud; Naosuke Kamei; Goki Kamei; Tomoyuki Nakasa; Ryo Shimizu; Yohei Harada; Nobuo Adachi; Nabil Ahmed Misk; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Osteochondral regeneration using a novel aragonite-hyaluronate bi-phasic scaffold in a goat model.

Authors:  E Kon; G Filardo; D Robinson; J A Eisman; A Levy; K Zaslav; J Shani; N Altschuler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Unicompartmental osteoarthritis: an integrated biomechanical and biological approach as alternative to metal resurfacing.

Authors:  M Marcacci; S Zaffagnini; E Kon; G M Marcheggiani Muccioli; A Di Martino; B Di Matteo; T Bonanzinga; F Iacono; G Filardo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Surgical management of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee.

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Peter N Chalmers; Adam B Yanke; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.