Literature DB >> 25465616

Engineering complex orthopaedic tissues via strategic biomimicry.

Dovina Qu1, Christopher Z Mosher, Margaret K Boushell, Helen H Lu.   

Abstract

The primary current challenge in regenerative engineering resides in the simultaneous formation of more than one type of tissue, as well as their functional assembly into complex tissues or organ systems. Tissue-tissue synchrony is especially important in the musculoskeletal system, wherein overall organ function is enabled by the seamless integration of bone with soft tissues such as ligament, tendon, or cartilage, as well as the integration of muscle with tendon. Therefore, in lieu of a traditional single-tissue system (e.g., bone, ligament), composite tissue scaffold designs for the regeneration of functional connective tissue units (e.g., bone-ligament-bone) are being actively investigated. Closely related is the effort to re-establish tissue-tissue interfaces, which is essential for joining these tissue building blocks and facilitating host integration. Much of the research at the forefront of the field has centered on bioinspired stratified or gradient scaffold designs which aim to recapitulate the structural and compositional inhomogeneity inherent across distinct tissue regions. As such, given the complexity of these musculoskeletal tissue units, the key question is how to identify the most relevant parameters for recapitulating the native structure-function relationships in the scaffold design. Therefore, the focus of this review, in addition to presenting the state-of-the-art in complex scaffold design, is to explore how strategic biomimicry can be applied in engineering tissue connectivity. The objective of strategic biomimicry is to avoid over-engineering by establishing what needs to be learned from nature and defining the essential matrix characteristics that must be reproduced in scaffold design. Application of this engineering strategy for the regeneration of the most common musculoskeletal tissue units (e.g., bone-ligament-bone, muscle-tendon-bone, cartilage-bone) will be discussed in this review. It is anticipated that these exciting efforts will enable integrative and functional repair of soft tissue injuries, and moreover, lay the foundation for the development of composite tissue systems and ultimately, total limb or joint regeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25465616      PMCID: PMC4380678          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-014-1190-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  122 in total

Review 1.  Structure-function considerations of muscle-tendon junctions.

Authors:  John A Trotter
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.320

2.  Osteochondral interface regeneration of the rabbit knee with macroscopic gradients of bioactive signals.

Authors:  Nathan H Dormer; Milind Singh; Liang Zhao; Neethu Mohan; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  A novel MSC-seeded triphasic construct for the repair of osteochondral defects.

Authors:  B Marquass; J S Somerson; P Hepp; T Aigner; S Schwan; A Bader; C Josten; M Zscharnack; R M Schulz
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Tensile strength of the cement-bone interface depends on the amount of bone interdigitated with PMMA cement.

Authors:  K A Mann; D C Ayers; F W Werner; R J Nicoletta; M D Fortino
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 5.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  M H Getelman; M J Friedman
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 6.  Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects.

Authors:  E B Hunziker
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Engineering graded tissue interfaces.

Authors:  Jennifer E Phillips; Kellie L Burns; Joseph M Le Doux; Robert E Guldberg; Andrés J García
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Novel nanostructured scaffold for osteochondral regeneration: pilot study in horses.

Authors:  E Kon; A Muttini; E Arcangeli; M Delcogliano; G Filardo; N Nicoli Aldini; D Pressato; R Quarto; S Zaffagnini; M Marcacci
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.963

Review 9.  Repair and regeneration of osteochondral defects in the articular joints.

Authors:  Wojciech Swieszkowski; Barnabas Ho Saey Tuan; Krzysztof J Kurzydlowski; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Biomol Eng       Date:  2007-08-07

10.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of orthopedic interface repair using a tissue scaffold with a continuous hard tissue-soft tissue transition.

Authors:  Darryl A Dickerson; Tarik N Misk; David C Van Sickle; Gert J Breur; Eric A Nauman
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  22 in total

1.  Bioinspired Scaffold Designs for Regenerating Musculoskeletal Tissue Interfaces.

Authors:  Mohammed A Barajaa; Lakshmi S Nair; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Regen Eng Transl Med       Date:  2019-12-17

2.  Inverse Opal Scaffolds with Gradations in Mineral Content for Spatial Control of Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Chunlei Zhu; Jichuan Qiu; Suphannee Pongkitwitoon; Stavros Thomopoulos; Younan Xia
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 30.849

3.  Functionally Graded, Bone- and Tendon-Like Polyurethane for Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Dai Fei Elmer Ker; Dan Wang; Anthony William Behn; Evelyna Tsi Hsin Wang; Xu Zhang; Benjamin Yamin Zhou; Ángel Enrique Mercado-Pagán; Sungwoo Kim; John Kleimeyer; Burhan Gharaibeh; Yaser Shanjani; Drew Nelson; Marc Safran; Emilie Cheung; Phil Campbell; Yunzhi Peter Yang
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 18.808

Review 4.  Challenges in engineering osteochondral tissue grafts with hierarchical structures.

Authors:  Ivana Gadjanski; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 5.  Advances in biologic augmentation for rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Sahishnu Patel; Anthony P Gualtieri; Helen H Lu; William N Levine
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 6.  Coming to terms with tissue engineering and regenerative medicine in the lung.

Authors:  Y S Prakash; Daniel J Tschumperlin; Kurt R Stenmark
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.464

Review 7.  Poly (lactic acid)-based biomaterials for orthopaedic regenerative engineering.

Authors:  Ganesh Narayanan; Varadraj N Vernekar; Emmanuel L Kuyinu; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 8.  A Review on Chitosan's Uses as Biomaterial: Tissue Engineering, Drug Delivery Systems and Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Rayssa de Sousa Victor; Adillys Marcelo da Cunha Santos; Bianca Viana de Sousa; Gelmires de Araújo Neves; Lisiane Navarro de Lima Santana; Romualdo Rodrigues Menezes
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  A Composite Lactide-Mineral 3D-Printed Scaffold for Bone Repair and Regeneration.

Authors:  Rayan Fairag; Li Li; Jose Luis Ramirez-GarciaLuna; M Scott Taylor; Brian Gaerke; Michael H Weber; Derek H Rosenzweig; Lisbet Haglund
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-09

10.  Green electrospinning for biomaterials and biofabrication.

Authors:  Christopher Z Mosher; Philip A P Brudnicki; Zhengxiang Gong; Hannah R Childs; Sang Won Lee; Romare M Antrobus; Elisa C Fang; Theanne N Schiros; Helen H Lu
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 11.061

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.