Literature DB >> 34102612

Green electrospinning for biomaterials and biofabrication.

Christopher Z Mosher1, Philip A P Brudnicki1, Zhengxiang Gong1, Hannah R Childs1, Sang Won Lee1, Romare M Antrobus1, Elisa C Fang1, Theanne N Schiros2,3, Helen H Lu1,2.   

Abstract

Green manufacturing has emerged across industries, propelled by a growing awareness of the negative environmental and health impacts associated with traditional practices. In the biomaterials industry, electrospinning is a ubiquitous fabrication method for producing nano- to micro-scale fibrous meshes that resemble native tissues, but this process traditionally utilizes solvents that are environmentally hazardous and pose a significant barrier to industrial scale-up and clinical translation. Applying sustainability principles to biomaterial production, we have developed a 'green electrospinning' process by systematically testing biologically benign solvents (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Q3C Class 3), and have identified acetic acid as a green solvent that exhibits low ecological impact (global warming potential (GWP) = 1.40 CO2eq. kg/L) and supports a stable electrospinning jet under routine fabrication conditions. By tuning electrospinning parameters, such as needle-plate distance and flow rate, we updated the fabrication of widely utilized biomedical polymers (e.g. poly-α-hydroxyesters, collagen), polymer blends, polymer-ceramic composites, and growth factor delivery systems. Resulting 'green' fibers and composites are comparable to traditional meshes in terms of composition, chemistry, architecture, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility. Interestingly, material properties of green synthetic fibers are more biomimetic than those of traditionally electrospun fibers, doubling in ductility (91.86 ± 35.65 vs. 45 ± 15.07%,n= 10,p< 0.05) without compromising yield strength (1.32 ± 0.26 vs. 1.38 ± 0.32 MPa) or ultimate tensile strength (2.49 ± 0.55 vs. 2.36 ± 0.45 MPa). Most importantly, green electrospinning proves advantageous for biofabrication, rendering a greater protection of growth factors during fiber formation (72.30 ± 1.94 vs. 62.87 ± 2.49% alpha helical content,n= 3,p< 0.05) and recapitulating native ECM mechanics in the fabrication of biopolymer-based meshes (16.57 ± 3.92% ductility, 33.38 ± 30.26 MPa elastic modulus, 1.30 ± 0.19 MPa yield strength, and 2.13 ± 0.36 MPa ultimate tensile strength,n= 10). The eco-conscious approach demonstrated here represents a paradigm shift in biofabrication, and will accelerate the translation of scalable biomaterials and biomimetic scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biofabrication; biomaterials; fiber; green electrospinning; green manufacturing; scaffold; tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34102612      PMCID: PMC8344371          DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac0964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   11.061


  58 in total

Review 1.  Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 2015: A Year in Review.

Authors:  Holly Wobma; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Nanofiber-based transforming growth factor-β3 release induces fibrochondrogenic differentiation of stem cells.

Authors:  Dovina Qu; Jennifer P Zhu; Hannah R Childs; Helen H Lu
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  The measurement and modelling of the mechanical properties of human skin in vivo--I. The measurement.

Authors:  J F Manschot; A J Brakkee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Polymeric mesh and insulin-like growth factor 1 delivery enhance cell homing and graft-cartilage integration.

Authors:  Margaret K Boushell; Christopher Z Mosher; Gurbani K Suri; Stephen B Doty; Eric J Strauss; Ernst B Hunziker; Helen H Lu
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Tendon tissue engineering: adipose-derived stem cell and GDF-5 mediated regeneration using electrospun matrix systems.

Authors:  R James; S G Kumbar; C T Laurencin; G Balian; A B Chhabra
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.715

6.  Compositional effects on the formation of a calcium phosphate layer and the response of osteoblast-like cells on polymer-bioactive glass composites.

Authors:  Helen H Lu; Amy Tang; Seong Cheol Oh; Jeffrey P Spalazzi; Kathie Dionisio
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Putting Electrospun Nanofibers to Work for Biomedical Research.

Authors:  Jingwei Xie; Xiaoran Li; Younan Xia
Journal:  Macromol Rapid Commun       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 5.734

8.  Rethinking ecosystem resilience in the face of climate change.

Authors:  Isabelle M Côté; Emily S Darling
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Biomechanical testing of commercially available soft-tissue augmentation materials.

Authors:  F Alan Barber; Jorge Aziz-Jacobo
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Preparation and characterization of biodegradable PLA polymeric blends.

Authors:  Chien Chung Chen; Ju Yu Chueh; How Tseng; Haw Ming Huang; Sheng Yang Lee
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  4 in total

1.  Electrospun Nisin-Loaded Poly(ε-caprolactone)-Based Active Food Packaging.

Authors:  Alena Opálková Šišková; Katarína Mosnáčková; Marta Musioł; Andrej Opálek; Mária Bučková; Piotr Rychter; Anita Eckstein Andicsová
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 2.  Electro Fluid Dynamics: A Route to Design Polymers and Composites for Biomedical and Bio-Sustainable Applications.

Authors:  Nergis Zeynep Renkler; Iriczalli Cruz-Maya; Irene Bonadies; Vincenzo Guarino
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.967

3.  Design of Asymmetric Nanofibers-Membranes Based on Polyvinyl Alcohol and Wool-Keratin for Wound Healing Applications.

Authors:  Diego O Sanchez Ramirez; Iriczalli Cruz-Maya; Claudia Vineis; Cinzia Tonetti; Alessio Varesano; Vincenzo Guarino
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2021-12-20

Review 4.  The Contribution of Silk Fibroin in Biomedical Engineering.

Authors:  Cristian Lujerdean; Gabriela-Maria Baci; Alexandra-Antonia Cucu; Daniel Severus Dezmirean
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.769

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.