Literature DB >> 25460189

Rate-adjusted spike-LFP coherence comparisons from spike-train statistics.

Mikio C Aoi1, Kyle Q Lepage2, Mark A Kramer2, Uri T Eden2.   

Abstract

Coherence is a fundamental tool in the analysis of neuronal data and for studying multiscale interactions of single and multiunit spikes with local field potentials. However, when the coherence is used to estimate rhythmic synchrony between spiking and any other time series, the magnitude of the coherence is dependent upon the spike rate. This property is not a statistical bias, but a feature of the coherence function. This dependence confounds cross-condition comparisons of spike-field and spike-spike coherence in electrophysiological experiments. Taking inspiration from correction methods that adjust the spike rate of a recording with bootstrapping ('thinning'), we propose a method of estimating a correction factor for the spike-field and spike-spike coherence that adjusts the coherence to account for this rate dependence. We demonstrate that the proposed rate adjustment is accurate under standard assumptions and derive distributional properties of the estimator. The reduced estimation variance serves to provide a more powerful test of cross-condition differences in spike-LFP coherence than the thinning method and does not require repeated Monte Carlo trials. We also demonstrate some of the negative consequences of failing to account for rate dependence. The proposed spike-field coherence estimator accurately adjusts the spike-field coherence with respect to rate and has well-defined distributional properties that endow the estimator with lower estimation variance than the existing adjustment method.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coherence; Point processes; Rhythms; Spike–field; Synchrony

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25460189      PMCID: PMC4336674          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  20 in total

1.  Correcting the bias of spike field coherence estimators due to a finite number of spikes.

Authors:  D W Grasse; K A Moxon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The pairwise phase consistency: a bias-free measure of rhythmic neuronal synchronization.

Authors:  Martin Vinck; Marijn van Wingerden; Thilo Womelsdorf; Pascal Fries; Cyriel M A Pennartz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Multisensory processing and oscillatory gamma responses: effects of spatial selective attention.

Authors:  Daniel Senkowski; Durk Talsma; Christoph S Herrmann; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Gamma-band synchronization in visual cortex predicts speed of change detection.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Pascal Fries; Partha P Mitra; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Free choice activates a decision circuit between frontal and parietal cortex.

Authors:  Bijan Pesaran; Matthew J Nelson; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Spatial attention decorrelates intrinsic activity fluctuations in macaque area V4.

Authors:  Jude F Mitchell; Kristy A Sundberg; John H Reynolds
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  The dependence of spike field coherence on expected intensity.

Authors:  Kyle Q Lepage; Mark A Kramer; Uri T Eden
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons.

Authors:  Costas A Anastassiou; Rodrigo Perin; Henry Markram; Christof Koch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-16       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Gamma-band synchronization in the macaque hippocampus and memory formation.

Authors:  Michael J Jutras; Pascal Fries; Elizabeth A Buffalo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  High-frequency, long-range coupling between prefrontal and visual cortex during attention.

Authors:  Georgia G Gregoriou; Stephen J Gotts; Huihui Zhou; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  7 in total

1.  Prefrontal D1 Dopamine-Receptor Neurons and Delta Resonance in Interval Timing.

Authors:  Young-Cho Kim; Nandakumar S Narayanan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Rhythmic coordination of hippocampal neurons during associative memory processing.

Authors:  Lara M Rangel; Jon W Rueckemann; Pamela D Riviere; Katherine R Keefe; Blake S Porter; Ian S Heimbuch; Carl H Budlong; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Primary sensorimotor cortex exhibits complex dependencies of spike-field coherence on neuronal firing rates, field power, and behavior.

Authors:  F I Arce-McShane; B J Sessle; C F Ross; N G Hatsopoulos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Altered resonance properties of somatosensory responses in mice deficient for the schizophrenia risk gene Neuregulin 1.

Authors:  Claudia S Barz; Thomas Bessaih; Ted Abel; Dirk Feldmeyer; Diego Contreras
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.270

5.  Routing information flow by separate neural synchrony frequencies allows for "functionally labeled lines" in higher primate cortex.

Authors:  Mohammad Bagher Khamechian; Vladislav Kozyrev; Stefan Treue; Moein Esghaei; Mohammad Reza Daliri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Distinct Structure of Cortical Population Activity on Fast and Infraslow Timescales.

Authors:  Michael Okun; Nicholas A Steinmetz; Armin Lak; Martynas Dervinis; Kenneth D Harris
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  A flexible likelihood approach for predicting neural spiking activity from oscillatory phase.

Authors:  Teryn D Johnson; Todd P Coleman; Lara M Rangel
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.