Literature DB >> 26751780

Rhythmic coordination of hippocampal neurons during associative memory processing.

Lara M Rangel1,2,3, Jon W Rueckemann1, Pamela D Riviere1, Katherine R Keefe1, Blake S Porter1,4, Ian S Heimbuch1,5, Carl H Budlong1, Howard Eichenbaum1.   

Abstract

Hippocampal oscillations are dynamic, with unique oscillatory frequencies present during different behavioral states. To examine the extent to which these oscillations reflect neuron engagement in distinct local circuit processes that are important for memory, we recorded single cell and local field potential activity from the CA1 region of the hippocampus as rats performed a context-guided odor-reward association task. We found that theta (4-12 Hz), beta (15-35 Hz), low gamma (35-55 Hz), and high gamma (65-90 Hz) frequencies exhibited dynamic amplitude profiles as rats sampled odor cues. Interneurons and principal cells exhibited unique engagement in each of the four rhythmic circuits in a manner that related to successful performance of the task. Moreover, principal cells coherent to each rhythm differentially represented task dimensions. These results demonstrate that distinct processing states arise from the engagement of rhythmically identifiable circuits, which have unique roles in organizing task-relevant processing in the hippocampus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CA1; beta; gamma; hippocampus; neuroscience; oscillations; rat; theta

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26751780      PMCID: PMC4718808          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.09849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  49 in total

1.  Propagating waves mediate information transfer in the motor cortex.

Authors:  Doug Rubino; Kay A Robbins; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-11-19       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  An olfacto-hippocampal network is dynamically involved in odor-discrimination learning.

Authors:  Claire Martin; Jennifer Beshel; Leslie M Kay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Neural syntax: cell assemblies, synapsembles, and readers.

Authors:  György Buzsáki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Theta-gamma coupling increases during the learning of item-context associations.

Authors:  Adriano B L Tort; Robert W Komorowski; Joseph R Manns; Nancy J Kopell; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Rate-adjusted spike-LFP coherence comparisons from spike-train statistics.

Authors:  Mikio C Aoi; Kyle Q Lepage; Mark A Kramer; Uri T Eden
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Spatial firing properties of hippocampal theta cells.

Authors:  J L Kubie; R U Muller; E Bostock
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  In vivo optogenetic identification and manipulation of GABAergic interneuron subtypes.

Authors:  Lisa Roux; Eran Stark; Lucas Sjulson; György Buzsáki
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Robust conjunctive item-place coding by hippocampal neurons parallels learning what happens where.

Authors:  Robert W Komorowski; Joseph R Manns; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Transient 23-30 Hz oscillations in mouse hippocampus during exploration of novel environments.

Authors:  Joshua D Berke; Vaughn Hetrick; Jason Breck; Robert W Greene
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.899

10.  Gamma rhythms and beta rhythms have different synchronization properties.

Authors:  N Kopell; G B Ermentrout; M A Whittington; R D Traub
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  15 in total

1.  Methodological Considerations on the Use of Different Spectral Decomposition Algorithms to Study Hippocampal Rhythms.

Authors:  Y Zhou; A Sheremet; Y Qin; J P Kennedy; N M DiCola; S N Burke; A P Maurer
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-08-01

Review 2.  Inhibition shapes the organization of hippocampal representations.

Authors:  Sam McKenzie
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 3.  Gamma oscillations in cognitive disorders.

Authors:  Alexandra J Mably; Laura Lee Colgin
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Six-dimensional dynamic tractography atlas of language connectivity in the developing brain.

Authors:  Masaki Sonoda; Brian H Silverstein; Jeong-Won Jeong; Ayaka Sugiura; Yasuo Nakai; Takumi Mitsuhashi; Robert Rothermel; Aimee F Luat; Sandeep Sood; Eishi Asano
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 5.  How the sense of smell influences cognition throughout life.

Authors:  Johanna K Kostka; Sebastian H Bitzenhofer
Journal:  Neuroforum       Date:  2022-06-06

Review 6.  Multiple modes of hippocampal-prefrontal interactions in memory-guided behavior.

Authors:  Justin D Shin; Shantanu P Jadhav
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Neuronal Switching between Single- and Dual-Network Activity via Modulation of Intrinsic Membrane Properties.

Authors:  Savanna-Rae H Fahoum; Dawn M Blitz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  The Interplay of Hippocampus and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Memory-Based Decision Making.

Authors:  Regina A Weilbächer; Sebastian Gluth
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2016-12-29

9.  Verbal Paired Associates and the Hippocampus: The Role of Scenes.

Authors:  Ian A Clark; Misun Kim; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  A flexible likelihood approach for predicting neural spiking activity from oscillatory phase.

Authors:  Teryn D Johnson; Todd P Coleman; Lara M Rangel
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.