Literature DB >> 20114076

The pairwise phase consistency: a bias-free measure of rhythmic neuronal synchronization.

Martin Vinck1, Marijn van Wingerden, Thilo Womelsdorf, Pascal Fries, Cyriel M A Pennartz.   

Abstract

Oscillatory activity is a widespread phenomenon in nervous systems and has been implicated in numerous functions. Signals that are generated by two separate neuronal sources often demonstrate a consistent phase-relationship in a particular frequency-band, i.e., they demonstrate rhythmic neuronal synchronization. This consistency is conventionally measured by the PLV (phase-locking value) or the spectral coherence measure. Both statistical measures suffer from significant bias, in that their sample estimates overestimate the population statistics for finite sample sizes. This is a significant problem in the neurosciences where statistical comparisons are often made between conditions with a different number of trials or between neurons with a different number of spikes. We introduce a new circular statistic, the PPC (pairwise phase consistency). We demonstrate that the sample estimate of the PPC is a bias-free and consistent estimator of its corresponding population parameter. We show, both analytically and by means of numerical simulations, that the population statistic of the PPC is equivalent to the population statistic of the squared PLV. The variance and mean squared error of the PPC and PLV are compared. Finally, we demonstrate the practical relevance of the method in actual neuronal data recorded from the orbitofrontal cortex of rats that engage in a two-odour discrimination task. We find a strong increase in rhythmic synchronization of spikes relative to the local field potential (as measured by the PPC) for a wide range of low frequencies (including the theta-band) during the anticipation of sucrose delivery in comparison to the anticipation of quinine delivery. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20114076     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  149 in total

1.  Orientation selectivity and noise correlation in awake monkey area V1 are modulated by the gamma cycle.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Bruss Lima; Martin Vinck; Robert Oostenveld; Wolf Singer; Sergio Neuenschwander; Pascal Fries
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Stimulus Load and Oscillatory Activity in Higher Cortex.

Authors:  Simon Kornblith; Timothy J Buschman; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Layer-specific excitation/inhibition balances during neuronal synchronization in the visual cortex.

Authors:  Hillel Adesnik
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging phase synchronization as a measure of dynamic functional connectivity.

Authors:  Enrico Glerean; Juha Salmi; Juha M Lahnakoski; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2012-06-11

5.  Attentional modulation of cell-class-specific gamma-band synchronization in awake monkey area v4.

Authors:  Martin Vinck; Thilo Womelsdorf; Elizabeth A Buffalo; Robert Desimone; Pascal Fries
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Neuronal phase consistency tracks dynamic changes in acoustic spectral regularity.

Authors:  Adam M Gifford; Michael R Sperling; Ashwini Sharan; Richard J Gorniak; Ryan B Williams; Kathryn Davis; Michael J Kahana; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Dynamic ErbB4 Activity in Hippocampal-Prefrontal Synchrony and Top-Down Attention in Rodents.

Authors:  Zhibing Tan; Heath L Robinson; Dong-Min Yin; Yu Liu; Fang Liu; Hongsheng Wang; Thiri W Lin; Guanglin Xing; Lin Gan; Wen-Cheng Xiong; Lin Mei
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Gamma Oscillations in Rat Hippocampal Subregions Dentate Gyrus, CA3, CA1, and Subiculum Underlie Associative Memory Encoding.

Authors:  John B Trimper; Claire R Galloway; Andrew C Jones; Kaavya Mandi; Joseph R Manns
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Different Levels of Category Abstraction by Different Dynamics in Different Prefrontal Areas.

Authors:  Andreas Wutz; Roman Loonis; Jefferson E Roy; Jacob A Donoghue; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Gamma-Rhythmic Gain Modulation.

Authors:  Jianguang Ni; Thomas Wunderle; Christopher Murphy Lewis; Robert Desimone; Ilka Diester; Pascal Fries
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.