Literature DB >> 25454338

Anterior cingulate activity to monetary loss and basal ganglia activity to monetary gain uniquely contribute to the feedback negativity.

Dan Foti1, Anna Weinberg2, Edward M Bernat3, Greg H Proudfit2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The feedback negativity (FN) is an event-related potential that differentiates unfavorable versus favorable outcomes. Although thought to reflect error-related activity within the anterior cingulate cortex, recent work indicates the FN may also reflect reward-related activity that has been linked to the basal ganglia. To date, it remains unclear how to reconcile these conflicting perspectives.
METHODS: We decomposed the FN by applying time-frequency analysis to isolate activity unique to monetary losses and gains. The FN was recorded from 84 individuals during a laboratory gambling task.
RESULTS: Two signals contributed to the FN elicited by unpredictable outcomes: theta activity (4-7Hz) was increased following monetary loss, and delta activity (<3Hz) was increased following monetary gain. Predictable outcomes elicited delta but not theta activity. Source analysis revealed distinct generators, with loss-related theta localized to the anterior cingulate cortex and gain-related delta to a possible source in the striatum. Symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress reactivity were specifically associated with blunted gain-related delta.
CONCLUSIONS: The FN may be a composite of loss- and gain-related neural activity, reflecting distinct facets of reward processing. SIGNIFICANCE: Gain-related delta activity may provide unique information about reward dysfunction in major depression and other internalizing psychopathology.
Copyright © 2014 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACC; Depression; ERP; Feedback negativity; Reward; Striatum

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25454338      PMCID: PMC4385748          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.08.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  67 in total

1.  A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model.

Authors:  Manfred Fuchs; Jörn Kastner; Michael Wagner; Susan Hawes; John S Ebersole
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Human anterior cingulate cortex is activated by negative feedback: evidence from event-related potentials in a guessing task.

Authors:  Martin Ruchsow; Jo Grothe; Manfred Spitzer; Markus Kiefer
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event-related brain potential.

Authors:  Clay B Holroyd; Sander Nieuwenhuis; Nick Yeung; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details.

Authors:  R D Pascual-Marqui
Journal:  Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002

5.  Decomposing ERP time-frequency energy using PCA.

Authors:  Edward M Bernat; William J Williams; William J Gehring
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample.

Authors:  Julie D Henry; John R Crawford
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  2005-06

7.  The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses.

Authors:  William J Gehring; Adrian R Willoughby
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  When things are better or worse than expected: the medial frontal cortex and the allocation of processing resources.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Potts; Laura E Martin; Philip Burton; P Read Montague
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity.

Authors:  Clay B Holroyd; Michael G H Coles
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample.

Authors:  John R Crawford; Julie D Henry
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  2003-06
View more
  41 in total

1.  Genetic influences on functional connectivity associated with feedback processing and prediction error: Phase coupling of theta-band oscillations in twins.

Authors:  Şükrü Barış Demiral; Simon Golosheykin; Andrey P Anokhin
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Functional heterogeneity of perceived control in feedback processing.

Authors:  Ya Zheng; Mengyao Wang; Shiyu Zhou; Jing Xu
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Neural responses to social and monetary reward in early adolescence and emerging adulthood.

Authors:  Paige Ethridge; Autumn Kujawa; Melanie A Dirks; Kodi B Arfer; Ellen M Kessel; Daniel N Klein; Anna Weinberg
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Role of Reward Sensitivity and Processing in Major Depressive and Bipolar Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  Lauren B Alloy; Thomas Olino; Rachel D Freed; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2016-03-07

5.  Stimulus sequence context differentially modulates inhibition-related theta and delta band activity in a go/no-go task.

Authors:  Jeremy Harper; Stephen M Malone; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Abnormal approach-related motivation but spared reinforcement learning in MDD: Evidence from fronto-midline Theta oscillations and frontal Alpha asymmetry.

Authors:  Davide Gheza; Jasmina Bakic; Chris Baeken; Rudi De Raedt; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Binary sensitivity of theta activity for gain and loss when monitoring parametric prediction errors.

Authors:  Denise J C Janssen; Edita Poljac; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Expectancy effects in feedback processing are explained primarily by time-frequency delta not theta.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  Time-Frequency Reward-Related Delta Prospectively Predicts the Development of Adolescent-Onset Depression.

Authors:  Brady D Nelson; Zachary P Infantolino; Daniel N Klein; Greg Perlman; Roman Kotov; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-08-07

10.  Effects of reward context on feedback processing as indexed by time-frequency analysis.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.