Literature DB >> 16839285

When things are better or worse than expected: the medial frontal cortex and the allocation of processing resources.

Geoffrey F Potts1, Laura E Martin, Philip Burton, P Read Montague.   

Abstract

Access to limited-capacity neural systems of cognitive control must be restricted to the most relevant information. How the brain identifies and selects items for preferential processing is not fully understood. Anatomical models often place the selection mechanism in the medial frontal cortex (MFC), and one computational model proposes that the mesotelencephalic dopamine (DA) system, via its reward prediction properties, provides a "gate" through which information gains access to limited-capacity systems. There is a medial frontal event-related potential (ERP) index of attention selection, the anterior positivity (P2a), associated with DA reward system input to the MFC for the identification of task-relevant perceptual representations. The P2a has a similar spatio-temporal distribution as the medial frontal negativity (MFN), elicited to error responses or choices resulting in monetary loss. The MFN has also been linked to DA projections to the MFC but for action monitoring rather than attention selection. This study proposes that the P2a and the MFN reflect the same MFC evaluation function and use a passive reward prediction design containing neither instructed attention nor response to demonstrate that the ERP over medial frontal leads at the P2a/MFN latency is consistent with activity of midbrain DA neurons, positive to unpredicted rewards and negative when a predicted reward is withheld. This result suggests that MFC activity is regulated by DA reward system input and may function to identify items or actions that exceed or fail to meet motivational prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16839285     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  90 in total

1.  Synchrony of corticostriatal-midbrain activation enables normal inhibitory control and conflict processing in recovering alcoholic men.

Authors:  Tilman Schulte; Eva M Müller-Oehring; Edith V Sullivan; Adolf Pfefferbaum
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 2.  Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Individual differences in reward-prediction-error: extraversion and feedback-related negativity.

Authors:  Luke D Smillie; Andrew J Cooper; Alan D Pickering
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Neural response to action and reward prediction errors: Comparing the error-related negativity to behavioral errors and the feedback-related negativity to reward prediction violations.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Potts; Laura E Martin; Siri-Maria Kamp; Emanuel Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Dissociation of attention in learning and action: effects of lesions of the amygdala central nucleus, medial prefrontal cortex, and posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Maddux; Erin C Kerfoot; Souvik Chatterjee; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Expectancy effects in feedback processing are explained primarily by time-frequency delta not theta.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Emotional face processing and emotion regulation in children: an ERP study.

Authors:  Tracy A Dennis; Melville M Malone; Chao-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  Frontal theta links prediction errors to behavioral adaptation in reinforcement learning.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Michael J Frank; Theresa J Klein; John J B Allen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Changes in performance monitoring during sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Joaquin A Anguera; Rachael D Seidler; William J Gehring
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Sensitivity to monetary reward is most severely compromised in recently abstaining cocaine addicted individuals: a cross-sectional ERP study.

Authors:  Muhammad A Parvaz; Thomas Maloney; Scott J Moeller; Patricia A Woicik; Nelly Alia-Klein; Frank Telang; Gene-Jack Wang; Nancy K Squires; Nora D Volkow; Rita Z Goldstein
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.