Literature DB >> 28043892

Genetic influences on functional connectivity associated with feedback processing and prediction error: Phase coupling of theta-band oscillations in twins.

Şükrü Barış Demiral1, Simon Golosheykin2, Andrey P Anokhin2.   

Abstract

Detection and evaluation of the mismatch between the intended and actually obtained result of an action (reward prediction error) is an integral component of adaptive self-regulation of behavior. Extensive human and animal research has shown that evaluation of action outcome is supported by a distributed network of brain regions in which the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) plays a central role, and the integration of distant brain regions into a unified feedback-processing network is enabled by long-range phase synchronization of cortical oscillations in the theta band. Neural correlates of feedback processing are associated with individual differences in normal and abnormal behavior, however, little is known about the role of genetic factors in the cerebral mechanisms of feedback processing. Here we examined genetic influences on functional cortical connectivity related to prediction error in young adult twins (age 18, n=399) using event-related EEG phase coherence analysis in a monetary gambling task. To identify prediction error-specific connectivity pattern, we compared responses to loss and gain feedback. Monetary loss produced a significant increase of theta-band synchronization between the frontal midline region and widespread areas of the scalp, particularly parietal areas, whereas gain resulted in increased synchrony primarily within the posterior regions. Genetic analyses showed significant heritability of frontoparietal theta phase synchronization (24 to 46%), suggesting that individual differences in large-scale network dynamics are under substantial genetic control. We conclude that theta-band synchronization of brain oscillations related to negative feedback reflects genetically transmitted differences in the neural mechanisms of feedback processing. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence for genetic influences on task-related functional brain connectivity assessed using direct real-time measures of neuronal synchronization.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain oscillations; Connectivity; EEG; Feedback; Genetics; Neural synchrony; Phase coherence; Prediction error

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28043892      PMCID: PMC5392371          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  68 in total

Review 1.  The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration.

Authors:  F Varela; J P Lachaux; E Rodriguez; J Martinerie
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Longitudinal genetic analysis of EEG coherence in young twins.

Authors:  G C van Baal; D I Boomsma; E J de Geus
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 3.  Common fronto-parietal activity in attention, memory, and consciousness: shared demands on integration?

Authors:  Hamid Reza Naghavi; Lars Nyberg
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2004-12-08

Review 4.  Neurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior.

Authors:  Markus Ullsperger; Claudia Danielmeier; Gerhard Jocham
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 5.  Error-related brain activity in the age of RDoC: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Anna Weinberg; Raoul Dieterich; Anja Riesel
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP.

Authors:  H V Semlitsch; P Anderer; P Schuster; O Presslich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Responses of human anterior cingulate cortex microdomains to error detection, conflict monitoring, stimulus-response mapping, familiarity, and orienting.

Authors:  Chunmao Wang; Istvan Ulbert; Donald L Schomer; Ksenija Marinkovic; Eric Halgren
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Feedback-related negativity codes prediction error but not behavioral adjustment during probabilistic reversal learning.

Authors:  Henry W Chase; Rachel Swainson; Lucy Durham; Laura Benham; Roshan Cools
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Nuclei accumbens phase synchrony predicts decision-making reversals following negative feedback.

Authors:  Michael X Cohen; Nikolai Axmacher; Doris Lenartz; Christian E Elger; Volker Sturm; Thomas E Schlaepfer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  High-learners present larger mid-frontal theta power and connectivity in response to incorrect performance feedback.

Authors:  Caroline Di Bernardi Luft; Guido Nolte; Joydeep Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  1 in total

1.  Testing the effects of adolescent alcohol use on adult conflict-related theta dynamics.

Authors:  Jeremy Harper; Stephen M Malone; William G Iacono
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.708

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.