Literature DB >> 30638695

Ultrasound Imaging of Microbubble Activity during Sonoporation Pulse Sequences.

Sara Keller1, Matthew Bruce2, Michalakis A Averkiou3.   

Abstract

Ultrasound-mediated drug delivery using the mechanical action of oscillating and/or collapsing microbubbles has been studied on many different experimental platforms, both in vitro and in vivo; however, the mechanisms remain to be elucidated. Many groups use sterile, enclosed chambers, such as Opticells and Clinicells, to optimize acoustic parameters in vitro needed for effective drug delivery in vivo, as well as for mechanistic investigation of sonoporation or the use of sound to permeate cell membranes. In these containers, cell monolayers are seeded on one side, and the remainder of the volume is filled with a solution containing microbubbles and a model drug. Ultrasound is then applied to study the effect of different parameters on model drug uptake in cell monolayers. Despite the simplicity of this system, the field has been unable to appropriately address what parameters and microbubble concentrations are most effective at enhancing drug uptake and minimizing cellular toxicity. In this work, a common in vitro sonoporation experimental setup was characterized through quantitative analysis of microbubble-dependent acoustic attenuation in combination with high-frame-rate and high-resolution imaging of bubble activity during sonoporation pulse sequences. The goal was to visualize the effect that ultrasound parameters have on microbubble activity. It was observed that under literature-derived sonoporation conditions (0.1-1 MPa, 20-1000 cycles and 10,000 to 10,000,000 microbubbles/mL), there is strong and non-linear acoustic attenuation, as well as bubble destruction, gas diffusion and bubble motion resulting in spatiotemporal pressure and concentration gradients. Ultimately, it was found that the acoustic conditions in common in vitro sonoporation setups are much more complex and confounding than often assumed.
Copyright © 2018 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cavitation imaging; Drug delivery; Microbubble attenuation; Sonoporation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30638695      PMCID: PMC6690385          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  29 in total

1.  Experimental study of the effects of Optison concentration on sonoporation in vitro.

Authors:  M Ward; J Wu; J F Chiu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Measurements of bubble-enhanced heating from focused, MHz-frequency ultrasound in a tissue-mimicking material.

Authors:  R G Holt; R A Roy
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 3.  Healing sound: the use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements.

Authors:  N de Jong; L Hoff; T Skotland; N Bom
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Augmentation of cardiac protein delivery using ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction.

Authors:  Raffi Bekeredjian; Shuyuan Chen; Paul A Grayburn; Ralph V Shohet
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 6.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery.

Authors:  Katherine Ferrara; Rachel Pollard; Mark Borden
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.590

7.  Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability.

Authors:  Raffi Karshafian; Peter D Bevan; Ross Williams; Sanya Samac; Peter N Burns
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Bioeffects caused by changes in acoustic cavitation bubble density and cell concentration: a unified explanation based on cell-to-bubble ratio and blast radius.

Authors:  Héctor R Guzmán; Andrew J McNamara; Daniel X Nguyen; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Local delivery system of cytotoxic agents to tumors by focused sonoporation.

Authors:  K Iwanaga; K Tominaga; K Yamamoto; M Habu; H Maeda; S Akifusa; T Tsujisawa; T Okinaga; J Fukuda; T Nishihara
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 5.987

10.  Acoustic attenuation by contrast agent microbubbles in superficial tissue markedly diminishes petechiae bioeffects in deep tissue.

Authors:  Ji Song; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack; Richard J Price
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  2 in total

1.  High-Frequency Array-Based Nanobubble Nonlinear Imaging in a Phantom and In Vivo.

Authors:  Carly Pellow; Emmanuel Cherin; Eric C Abenojar; Agata A Exner; Gang Zheng; Christine E M Demore; David E Goertz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  A Setup for Microscopic Studies of Ultrasounds Effects on Microliters Scale Samples: Analytical, Numerical and Experimental Characterization.

Authors:  Florian N Gailliègue; Mindaugas Tamošiūnas; Franck M André; Lluis M Mir
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 6.321

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.