Literature DB >> 32341725

Ultrasound-induced molecular delivery to erythrocytes using a microfluidic system.

Connor S Centner1, Emily M Murphy1, Mariah C Priddy1, John T Moore1, Brett R Janis2, Michael A Menze2, Andrew P DeFilippis3, Jonathan A Kopechek1.   

Abstract

Preservation of erythrocytes in a desiccated state for storage at ambient temperature could simplify blood transfusions in austere environments, such as rural clinics, far-forward military operations, and during space travel. Currently, storage of erythrocytes is limited by a short shelf-life of 42 days at 4 °C, and long-term preservation requires a complex process that involves the addition and removal of glycerol from erythrocytes before and after storage at -80 °C, respectively. Natural compounds, such as trehalose, can protect cells in a desiccated state if they are present at sufficient levels inside the cell, but mammalian cell membranes lack transporters for this compound. To facilitate compound loading across the plasma membrane via ultrasound and microbubbles (sonoporation), a polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic device was developed. Delivery of fluorescein into erythrocytes was tested at various conditions to assess the effects of parameters such as ultrasound pressure, ultrasound pulse interval, microbubble dose, and flow rate. Changes in ultrasound pressure and mean flow rate caused statistically significant increases in fluorescein delivery of up to 73 ± 37% (p < 0.05) and 44 ± 33% (p < 0.01), respectively, compared to control groups, but no statistically significant differences were detected with changes in ultrasound pulse intervals. Following freeze-drying and rehydration, recovery of viable erythrocytes increased by up to 128 ± 32% after ultrasound-mediated loading of trehalose compared to control groups (p < 0.05). These results suggest that ultrasound-mediated molecular delivery in microfluidic channels may be a viable approach to process erythrocytes for long-term storage in a desiccated state at ambient temperatures.
Copyright © 2020 Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32341725      PMCID: PMC7176461          DOI: 10.1063/1.5144617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomicrofluidics        ISSN: 1932-1058            Impact factor:   2.800


  50 in total

Review 1.  The role of Ca(2+) in ultrasound-elicited bioeffects: progress, perspectives and prospects.

Authors:  Mariame A Hassan; Paul Campbell; Takashi Kondo
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  Sonoporation by single-shot pulsed ultrasound with microbubbles adjacent to cells.

Authors:  Nobuki Kudo; Kengo Okada; Katsuyuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  High-temperature tolerance in anhydrobiotic tardigrades is limited by glass transition.

Authors:  S Hengherr; M R Worland; A Reuner; F Brümmer; R O Schill
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.247

Review 4.  Microbubble-mediated ultrasound drug-delivery and therapeutic monitoring.

Authors:  Charles A Sennoga; Emma Kanbar; Laurent Auboire; Paul-Armand Dujardin; Damien Fouan; Jean-Michel Escoffre; Ayache Bouakaz
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2016-12-11       Impact factor: 6.648

5.  Stabilization of dry Mammalian cells: lessons from nature.

Authors:  John H Crowe; Lois M Crowe; Willem F Wolkers; Ann E Oliver; Xiaocui Ma; Joong-Hyuck Auh; Minke Tang; Shijun Zhu; Jeffrey Norris; Fern Tablin
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  Studies in red blood cell preservation. 2. Comparison of vesicle formation, morphology, and membrane lipids during storage in AS-1 and CPDA-1.

Authors:  T J Greenwalt; C Zehner Sostok; U J Dumaswala
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.144

7.  Acoustic activation of drug delivery from polymeric micelles: effect of pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  A Marin; M Muniruzzaman; N Rapoport
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2001-04-28       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Ultrasound and microbubble mediated drug delivery: acoustic pressure as determinant for uptake via membrane pores or endocytosis.

Authors:  Ine De Cock; Elisa Zagato; Kevin Braeckmans; Ying Luan; Nico de Jong; Stefaan C De Smedt; Ine Lentacker
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 9.  Molecular approaches for improving desiccation tolerance: insights from the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana.

Authors:  Steven C Hand; Michael A Menze
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 4.116

10.  Acoustofluidic, label-free separation and simultaneous concentration of rare tumor cells from white blood cells.

Authors:  Maria Antfolk; Cecilia Magnusson; Per Augustsson; Hans Lilja; Thomas Laurell
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in acoustic microfluidics and its exemplary applications.

Authors:  Yue Li; Shuxiang Cai; Honglin Shen; Yibao Chen; Zhixing Ge; Wenguang Yang
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.258

2.  Sonoporation: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Joseph Rich; Zhenhua Tian; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2021-09-14

Review 3.  Microfluidic and Nanofluidic Intracellular Delivery.

Authors:  Jeongsoo Hur; Aram J Chung
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 16.806

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.