Literature DB >> 25442348

A simple and efficient methodology to improve geometric accuracy in gamma knife radiation surgery: implementation in multiple brain metastases.

Pantelis Karaiskos1, Argyris Moutsatsos2, Eleftherios Pappas2, Evangelos Georgiou2, Arkadios Roussakis3, Michael Torrens4, Ioannis Seimenis5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To propose, verify, and implement a simple and efficient methodology for the improvement of total geometric accuracy in multiple brain metastases gamma knife (GK) radiation surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The proposed methodology exploits the directional dependence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-related spatial distortions stemming from background field inhomogeneities, also known as sequence-dependent distortions, with respect to the read-gradient polarity during MRI acquisition. First, an extra MRI pulse sequence is acquired with the same imaging parameters as those used for routine patient imaging, aside from a reversal in the read-gradient polarity. Then, "average" image data are compounded from data acquired from the 2 MRI sequences and are used for treatment planning purposes. The method was applied and verified in a polymer gel phantom irradiated with multiple shots in an extended region of the GK stereotactic space. Its clinical impact in dose delivery accuracy was assessed in 15 patients with a total of 96 relatively small (<2 cm) metastases treated with GK radiation surgery.
RESULTS: Phantom study results showed that use of average MR images eliminates the effect of sequence-dependent distortions, leading to a total spatial uncertainty of less than 0.3 mm, attributed mainly to gradient nonlinearities. In brain metastases patients, non-eliminated sequence-dependent distortions lead to target localization uncertainties of up to 1.3 mm (mean: 0.51 ± 0.37 mm) with respect to the corresponding target locations in the "average" MRI series. Due to these uncertainties, a considerable underdosage (5%-32% of the prescription dose) was found in 33% of the studied targets.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed methodology is simple and straightforward in its implementation. Regarding multiple brain metastases applications, the suggested approach may substantially improve total GK dose delivery accuracy in smaller, outlying targets.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25442348     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.08.349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  12 in total

1.  Large field of view distortion assessment in a low-field MR-linac.

Authors:  Siamak P Nejad-Davarani; Joshua P Kim; Dongsu Du; Carri Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evaluation of the ability of the Brainlab Elements Cranial Distortion Correction algorithm to correct clinically relevant MRI distortions for cranial SRT.

Authors:  Paul Retif; Abdourahamane Djibo Sidikou; Christian Mathis; Romain Letellier; Emilie Verrecchia-Ramos; Rémi Dupres; Xavier Michel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Audit feasibility for geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy.

Authors:  Meshal Alzahrani; David A Broadbent; Robert Chuter; Bashar Al-Qaisieh; Steven Jackson; Hutton Michael; Robert I Johnstone; Simon Shah; Andreas Wetscherek; H Joan Chick; Jonathan J Wyatt; Hazel Mhairi McCallum; Richard Speight
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-07

4.  Geometric distortion assessment in 3T MR images used for treatment planning in cranial Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Stefanos Theocharis; Eleftherios P Pappas; Ioannis Seimenis; Panagiotis Kouris; Dimitrios Dellios; Georgios Kollias; Pantelis Karaiskos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Distortion inherent to magnetic resonance imaging can lead to geometric miss in radiosurgery planning.

Authors:  Tyler M Seibert; Nathan S White; Gwe-Ya Kim; Vitali Moiseenko; Carrie R McDonald; Nikdokht Farid; Hauke Bartsch; Joshua Kuperman; Roshan Karunamuni; Deborah Marshall; Dominic Holland; Parag Sanghvi; Daniel R Simpson; Arno J Mundt; Anders M Dale; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01

6.  Dosimetric impact of rotational errors on the quality of VMAT-SRS for multiple brain metastases: Comparison between single- and two-isocenter treatment planning techniques.

Authors:  Georgia Prentou; Eleftherios P Pappas; Andreas Logothetis; Efi Koutsouveli; Evaggelos Pantelis; Panagiotis Papagiannis; Pantelis Karaiskos
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Characterizing geometrical accuracy in clinically optimised 7T and 3T magnetic resonance images for high-precision radiation treatment of brain tumours.

Authors:  Jurgen Peerlings; Inge Compter; Fiere Janssen; Christopher J Wiggins; Alida A Postma; Felix M Mottaghy; Philippe Lambin; Aswin L Hoffmann
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-01-03

8.  Total workflow uncertainty of frameless radiosurgery with the Gamma Knife Icon cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  William N Duggar; Bart Morris; Rui He; Claus Yang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.243

9.  Evaluating the accuracy of geometrical distortion correction of magnetic resonance images for use in intracranial brain tumor radiotherapy.

Authors:  Seyed Mehdi Bagherimofidi; Claus Chunli Yang; Roberto Rey-Dios; Madhava R Kanakamedala; Ali Fatemi
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-10-19

10.  MRI-Related Geometric Distortions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy Treatment Planning: Evaluation and Dosimetric Impact.

Authors:  Eleftherios P Pappas; Mukhtar Alshanqity; Argyris Moutsatsos; Hani Lababidi; Khalid Alsafi; Konstantinos Georgiou; Pantelis Karaiskos; Evangelos Georgiou
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.