Literature DB >> 35980455

Evaluation of the ability of the Brainlab Elements Cranial Distortion Correction algorithm to correct clinically relevant MRI distortions for cranial SRT.

Paul Retif1,2, Abdourahamane Djibo Sidikou3, Christian Mathis4, Romain Letellier3, Emilie Verrecchia-Ramos3, Rémi Dupres4, Xavier Michel5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) requires highly accurate lesion delineation. However, MRI can have significant inherent geometric distortions. We investigated how well the Elements Cranial Distortion Correction algorithm of Brainlab (Munich, Germany) corrects the distortions in MR image-sets of a phantom and patients.
METHODS: A non-distorted reference computed tomography image-set of a CIRS Model 603-GS (CIRS, Norfolk, VA, USA) phantom was acquired. Three-dimensional T1-weighted images were acquired with five MRI scanners and reconstructed with vendor-derived distortion correction. Some were reconstructed without correction to generate heavily distorted image-sets. All MR image-sets were corrected with the Brainlab algorithm relative to the computed tomography acquisition. CIRS Distortion Check software measured the distortion in each image-set. For all uncorrected and corrected image-sets, the control points that exceeded the 0.5-mm clinically relevant distortion threshold and the distortion maximum, mean, and standard deviation were recorded. Empirical cumulative distribution functions (eCDF) were plotted. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The algorithm was evaluated with 10 brain metastases using Dice similarity coefficients (DSC).
RESULTS: The algorithm significantly reduced mean and standard deviation distortion in all image-sets. It reduced the maximum distortion in the heavily distorted image-sets from 2.072 to 1.059 mm and the control points with > 0.5-mm distortion fell from 50.2% to 4.0%. Before and especially after correction, the eCDFs of the four repeats were visually similar. ICC was 0.812 (excellent-good agreement). The algorithm increased the DSCs for all patients and image-sets.
CONCLUSION: The Brainlab algorithm significantly and reproducibly ameliorated MRI distortion, even with heavily distorted images. Thus, it increases the accuracy of cranial SRT lesion delineation. After further testing, this tool may be suitable for SRT of small lesions.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cranial SRT; Image registration; Intracranial metastases; MRI distortion; Radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35980455     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01988-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   4.033


  29 in total

Review 1.  Spatial Precision in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Radiation Therapy: The Role of Geometric Distortion.

Authors:  Joseph Weygand; Clifton David Fuller; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Yao Ding; Jinzhong Yang; Ken-Pin Hwang; Jihong Wang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Stereotactic radiosurgery of the brain: a review of common indications.

Authors:  Philip Gilbo; Isabella Zhang; Jonathan Knisely
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-09

3.  Evaluation of patient-specific MR distortion correction schemes for improved target localization accuracy in SRS.

Authors:  Dimitrios Dellios; Eleftherios P Pappas; Ioannis Seimenis; Chryssa Paraskevopoulou; Kostas I Lampropoulos; Georgia Lymperopoulou; Pantelis Karaiskos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Intracranial stereotactic positioning systems: Report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group no. 68.

Authors:  A W Lightstone; Stanley H Benedict; Frank J Bova; Timothy D Solberg; Robin L Stern
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for multiple brain metastases? A review of clinical and technical issues.

Authors:  Arjun Sahgal; Mark Ruschin; Lijun Ma; Wilko Verbakel; David Larson; Paul D Brown
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  LINAC based stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: guidance for clinical implementation.

Authors:  Dianne Hartgerink; Ans Swinnen; David Roberge; Alan Nichol; Piotr Zygmanski; Fang-Fang Yin; François Deblois; Coen Hurkmans; Chin Loon Ong; Anna Bruynzeel; Ayal Aizer; John Fiveash; John Kirckpatrick; Matthias Guckenberger; Nicolaus Andratschke; Dirk de Ruysscher; Richard Popple; Jaap Zindler
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Distortion inherent to magnetic resonance imaging can lead to geometric miss in radiosurgery planning.

Authors:  Tyler M Seibert; Nathan S White; Gwe-Ya Kim; Vitali Moiseenko; Carrie R McDonald; Nikdokht Farid; Hauke Bartsch; Joshua Kuperman; Roshan Karunamuni; Deborah Marshall; Dominic Holland; Parag Sanghvi; Daniel R Simpson; Arno J Mundt; Anders M Dale; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01

Review 8.  Technological quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy : Expert review group consensus from the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Daniela Schmitt; Oliver Blanck; Tobias Gauer; Michael K Fix; Thomas B Brunner; Jens Fleckenstein; Britta Loutfi-Krauss; Peter Manser; Rene Werner; Maria-Lisa Wilhelm; Wolfgang W Baus; Christos Moustakis
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance imaging for brain stereotactic radiotherapy : A review of requirements and pitfalls.

Authors:  Florian Putz; Veit Mengling; Rosalind Perrin; Siti Masitho; Thomas Weissmann; Johannes Rösch; Tobias Bäuerle; Rolf Janka; Alexander Cavallaro; Michael Uder; Patrick Amarteifio; Sylvain Doussin; Manuel Alexander Schmidt; Arndt Dörfler; Sabine Semrau; Sebastian Lettmaier; Rainer Fietkau; Christoph Bert
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Effect of setup error in the single-isocenter technique on stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases.

Authors:  Hisashi Nakano; Satoshi Tanabe; Satoru Utsunomiya; Takumi Yamada; Ryuta Sasamoto; Toshimichi Nakano; Hirotake Saito; Takeshi Takizawa; Hironori Sakai; Atsushi Ohta; Eisuke Abe; Motoki Kaidu; Hidefumi Aoyama
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.