Literature DB >> 25437594

Predicting the amount of intraperitoneal fluid accumulation by computed tomography and its clinical use in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Toru Ishiguro1, Youichi Kumagai, Hiroyuki Baba, Yusuke Tajima, Hideko Imaizumi, Okihide Suzuki, Koki Kuwabara, Takeaki Matsuzawa, Jun Sobajima, Minoru Fukuchi, Keiichiro Ishibashi, Erito Mochiki, Hideyuki Ishida.   

Abstract

The correlation between the amount of peritoneal fluid and clinical parameters in patients with perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) has not been investigated. The authors' objective was to derive a reliable formula for determining the amount of peritoneal fluid in patients with PPU before surgery, and to evaluate the correlation between the estimated amount of peritoneal fluid and clinical parameters. We investigated 62 consecutive patients who underwent emergency surgery for PPU, and in whom prediction of the amount of accumulated intraperitoneal fluid was possible by computed tomography (CT) using the methods described by Oriuchi et al. We examined the relationship between the predicted amount of accumulated intraperitoneal fluid and that measured during surgery, and the relationship between the amount of fluid predicted preoperatively or measured during surgery and several clinical parameters. There was a significant positive correlation between the amount of fluid predicted by CT scan and that measured during surgery. When patients with gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer were analyzed collectively, the predicted amount of intraperitoneal fluid and the amount measured during surgery were each associated with the period from onset until CT scan, perforation size, the Mannheim peritoneal index, and the severity of postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Our present results suggest that the method of Oriuchi et al is useful for predicting the amount of accumulated intraperitoneal fluid in patients with PPU, and that this would be potentially helpful for treatment decision-making and estimating the severity of postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Duodenal ulcer; Gastric ulcer; Peptic ulcer; Perforation; Peritoneal fluid

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25437594      PMCID: PMC4254247          DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00109.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Surg        ISSN: 0020-8868


  17 in total

1.  Computed tomography and complicated peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  E Pun; A Firkin
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  2004-12

Review 2.  Gastrointestinal tract perforation: CT diagnosis of presence, site, and cause.

Authors:  A Furukawa; M Sakoda; M Yamasaki; N Kono; T Tanaka; N Nitta; S Kanasaki; K Imoto; M Takahashi; K Murata; T Sakamoto; T Tani
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

3.  Minilaparotomy for perforated duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  Hideyuki Ishida; Toru Ishiguro; Kensuke Kumamoto; Tomonori Ohsawa; Jun Sobajima; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Norihiro Haga
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep

Review 4.  Perforated peptic ulcer disease: a review of history and treatment.

Authors:  Mariëtta J O E Bertleff; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 2.588

5.  Accuracy of MDCT in predicting site of gastrointestinal tract perforation.

Authors:  Bernard Hainaux; Emmanuel Agneessens; Raphael Bertinotti; Viviane De Maertelaer; Erika Rubesova; Elie Capelluto; Constantin Moschopoulos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Surgical management of peptic ulcer disease today--indication, technique and outcome.

Authors:  T T Zittel; E C Jehle; H D Becker
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Results of surgery for perforated gastroduodenal ulcers in a Dutch population.

Authors:  P H J Hemmer; J S de Schipper; B van Etten; J P E N Pierie; J J Bonenkamp; P W de Graaf; T M Karsten
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 2.588

8.  Surgical therapy of peptic ulcers in the 21st century: more common than you think.

Authors:  George A Sarosi; Kshama R Jaiswal; Fiemu E Nwariaku; Massiamo Asolati; Jason B Fleming; Thomas Anthony
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Epidemiology of perforated peptic ulcer: age- and gender-adjusted analysis of incidence and mortality.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Jan Terje Kvaløy; Tom Glomsaker; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  [The Mannheim peritonitis index. An instrument for the intraoperative prognosis of peritonitis].

Authors:  M M Linder; H Wacha; U Feldmann; G Wesch; R A Streifensand; E Gundlach
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 0.955

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Perforated peptic ulcer - an update.

Authors:  Kin Tong Chung; Vishalkumar G Shelat
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-27

Review 2.  Evaluation and treatment of malignant ascites secondary to gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiromichi Maeda; Michiya Kobayashi; Junichi Sakamoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Quantification of ascites based on abdomino-pelvic computed tomography scans for predicting the in-hospital mortality of liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Ran Wang; Xingshun Qi; Xiaozhong Guo
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.447

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.