Literature DB >> 22086121

Results of surgery for perforated gastroduodenal ulcers in a Dutch population.

P H J Hemmer1, J S de Schipper, B van Etten, J P E N Pierie, J J Bonenkamp, P W de Graaf, T M Karsten.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite improvements in anesthesiology and intensive care medicine, mortality for perforated gastroduodenal ulcer disease remains high. This study was designed to evaluate the results of surgery for perforated ulcer disease and to identify prognostic factors for mortality in order to optimize treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 272 patients undergoing emergency surgery for perforated ulcer disease from 2000 to 2005 in two large teaching hospitals and one university hospital in the Netherlands were retrospectively analyzed. Information on 89 pre-, peri- and postoperative data were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using multiple logistic regression analysis. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 16%. Variables associated with 30-day mortality were age, shock, tachycardia, anemia and ASA class.
CONCLUSIONS: A relatively low 30-day mortality rate was achieved. Age, shock, tachycardia and anemia were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Finding that shock, tachycardia and anemia are independently associated with 30-day mortality could indicate that patients are septic upon admission. Improvements in survival might be achieved by early sepsis treatment.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22086121     DOI: 10.1159/000331320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  8 in total

1.  Predicting the amount of intraperitoneal fluid accumulation by computed tomography and its clinical use in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Toru Ishiguro; Youichi Kumagai; Hiroyuki Baba; Yusuke Tajima; Hideko Imaizumi; Okihide Suzuki; Koki Kuwabara; Takeaki Matsuzawa; Jun Sobajima; Minoru Fukuchi; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Erito Mochiki; Hideyuki Ishida
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

2.  Treatment for perforated gastric ulcer: a multi-institutional retrospective review.

Authors:  Ryo Tanaka; Shin-ichi Kosugi; Kaoru Sakamoto; Kazuhito Yajima; Takashi Ishikawa; Tatsuo Kanda; Toshifumi Wakai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Emergency Major Abdominal Surgical Procedures in Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Mortality and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Zara Cooper; John W Scott; Ronnie A Rosenthal; Susan L Mitchell
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Epidemiology of perforated peptic ulcer: age- and gender-adjusted analysis of incidence and mortality.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Jan Terje Kvaløy; Tom Glomsaker; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Predicting outcomes in patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcers: artificial neural network modelling indicates a highly complex disease.

Authors:  K Søreide; K Thorsen; J A Søreide
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Management of Giant Gastric Ulcer Perforation: Report of a Case and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Nitin Vashistha; Dinesh Singhal; Gurpreet Makkar; Suneel Chakravarty; Vivek Raj
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2016-12-06

7.  Endoscopic stent treatment of a duodenal ulcer perforation using a semi-covered stent.

Authors:  Thor Erik Holm; Snorri Olafsson; Airazat M Kazaryan
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2019-07-04

Review 8.  Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.953

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.