Literature DB >> 25436840

The motivational salience of cigarette-related stimuli among former, never, and current smokers.

Jason D Robinson1, Francesco Versace1, Jeffery M Engelmann1, Yong Cui1, Aurelija Slapin1, Robert Oum1, Paul M Cinciripini1.   

Abstract

While smokers are known to find smoking-related stimuli motivationally salient, the extent to which former smokers do so is largely unknown. In this study, we collected event-related potential (ERP) data from former and never smokers and compared them to a sample of current smokers interested in quitting who completed the same ERP paradigm prior to smoking cessation treatment. All participants (n = 180) attended 1 laboratory session where we recorded dense-array ERPs in response to cigarette-related, pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures and where we collected valence and arousal ratings of the pictures. We identified 3 spatial and temporal regions of interest, corresponding to the P1 (120-132 ms), early posterior negativity (EPN; 244-316 ms), and late positive potential (LPP; 384-800 ms) ERP components. We found that all participants produced larger P1 responses to cigarette-related pictures compared to the other picture categories. With the EPN component, we found that, similar to pleasant and unpleasant pictures, cigarette-related pictures attracted early attentional resources, regardless of smoking status. Both former and never smokers produced reduced LPP responses to cigarette-related and pleasant pictures compared to current smokers. Current smokers rated the cigarette-related pictures as being more pleasant and arousing than the former and never smokers. The LPP and picture-rating results suggest that former smokers, like never smokers, do not find cigarette-related stimuli to be as motivationally salient as current smokers. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25436840      PMCID: PMC4314387          DOI: 10.1037/a0038467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  83 in total

1.  Event-related brain potentials as indicators of smoking cue-reactivity.

Authors:  C A Warren; B E McDonough
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task.

Authors:  Ronald N Ehrman; Steven J Robbins; Melissa A Bromwell; Megan E Lankford; John R Monterosso; Charles P O'Brien
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Implicit and explicit selective attention to smoking cues in smokers indexed by brain potentials.

Authors:  Marianne Littel; Ingmar H A Franken
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 4.153

4.  Brain reactivity to emotional, neutral and cigarette-related stimuli in smokers.

Authors:  Francesco Versace; Jennifer A Minnix; Jason D Robinson; Cho Y Lam; Victoria L Brown; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 4.280

5.  A psychometric evaluation of cigarette stimuli used in a cue reactivity study.

Authors:  Brian L Carter; Jason D Robinson; Cho Y Lam; David W Wetter; Jack Y Tsan; Susan X Day; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Electrophysiological evidence that drug cues have greater salience than other affective stimuli in opiate addiction.

Authors:  D I Lubman; N B Allen; L A Peters; J F W Deakin
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 4.153

7.  Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-23       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Craving-induced EEG reactivity in smokers: effects of mood induction, nicotine dependence and gender.

Authors:  Verner J Knott; Luma Naccache; Emmanuelle Cyr; Derek J Fisher; Judy F McIntosh; Anne M Millar; Crystal M Villeneuve
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 2.328

9.  Beyond cue reactivity: blunted brain responses to pleasant stimuli predict long-term smoking abstinence.

Authors:  Francesco Versace; Cho Y Lam; Jeffrey M Engelmann; Jason D Robinson; Jennifer A Minnix; Victoria L Brown; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 4.280

10.  Cue reactivity in smokers: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Erika Litvin Bloom; Geoffrey F Potts; David E Evans; David J Drobes
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.997

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Beyond Cue Reactivity: Non-Drug-Related Motivationally Relevant Stimuli Are Necessary to Understand Reactivity to Drug-Related Cues.

Authors:  Francesco Versace; Jeffrey M Engelmann; Menton M Deweese; Jason D Robinson; Charles E Green; Cho Y Lam; Jennifer A Minnix; Maher A Karam-Hage; David W Wetter; Susan M Schembre; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Cigarette cues capture attention of smokers and never-smokers, but for different reasons.

Authors:  Menton M Deweese; Maurizio Codispoti; Jason D Robinson; Paul M Cinciripini; Francesco Versace
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  P3 event-related potential reactivity to smoking cues: Relations with craving, tobacco dependence, and alcohol sensitivity in young adult smokers.

Authors:  Thomas M Piasecki; Kimberly A Fleming; Constantine J Trela; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2016-11-17

4.  Pharmacological intervention and abstinence in smokers undergoing cessation treatment: A psychophysiological study.

Authors:  Yong Cui; Jeffrey M Engelmann; Jonathan Xian; Jennifer A Minnix; Cho Y Lam; Maher Karam-Hage; Paul M Cinciripini; Jason D Robinson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Toward Precision Medicine for Smoking Cessation: Developing a Neuroimaging-Based Classification Algorithm to Identify Smokers at Higher Risk for Relapse.

Authors:  David W Frank; Paul M Cinciripini; Menton M Deweese; Maher Karam-Hage; George Kypriotakis; Caryn Lerman; Jason D Robinson; Rachel F Tyndale; Damon J Vidrine; Francesco Versace
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Brain Responses to Cigarette-Related and Emotional Images in Smokers During Smoking Cessation: No Effect of Varenicline or Bupropion on the Late Positive Potential.

Authors:  Francesco Versace; Elise M Stevens; Jason D Robinson; Yong Cui; Menton M Deweese; Jeffrey M Engelmann; Charles E Green; Maher Karam-Hage; Cho Y Lam; Jennifer A Minnix; David W Wetter; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Topiramate decreases the salience of motivationally relevant visual cues among smokers with alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Jason D Robinson; Yong Cui; Maher Karam-Hage; George Kypriotakis; Francesco Versace; Nassima Ait-Daoud Tiouririne; Robert M Anthenelli; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Attentional bias to smoking and other motivationally relevant cues is affected by nicotine exposure and dose expectancy.

Authors:  Jason D Robinson; Francesco Versace; Jeffery M Engelmann; Yong Cui; David G Gilbert; Andrew J Waters; Ellen R Gritz; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.153

9.  Individual differences in brain responses to cigarette-related cues and pleasant stimuli in young smokers.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Engelmann; Francesco Versace; Jonathan C Gewirtz; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Conditioned cortical reactivity to cues predicting cigarette-related or pleasant images.

Authors:  Menton M Deweese; Jason D Robinson; Paul M Cinciripini; Francesco Versace
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.997

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.