C A Warren1, B E McDonough. 1. School of Public Health, University of Illinois, Chicago 60612-7260, USA. charerp@uic.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Reactivity to smoking cues, shown previously by autonomic and self-report variables, was investigated in smokers and nonsmokers using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). METHODS: Average ERPs to 20 color pictures of people smoking and 20 neutral pictures depicting nonsmoking themes, randomly mixed with 4 repetitions/stimulus, were measured from 20 light-moderate smokers and 18 nonsmokers, following a stressor. Smoker status and stimulus type effects on ERPs and principal components factor scores (FS) were tested by repeated-measures ANOVAs. RESULTS: Smokers' N268 showed significant medial and midline smoking cue-reactivity (ERP to smoking-related minus neutral stimuli); while a P300-like, P412, showed significant smoking cue-reactivity over medial and left hemisphere scalp. FS analyses confirmed most of the foregoing. P412 smoking cue-reactivity was correlated with unpleasantness-pleasantness cue-reactivity but not with urge-to-smoke cue-reactivity. Nonsmokers' N268 stimulus differences were not significant, but significant P412 stimulus effects (unconfirmed by FS analyses) were found in central-to-posterior and in left parietal-temporal areas. CONCLUSIONS: Smokers' N268 is identified with a process detecting stimuli incongruent with tobacco-addicted states; and P412 smoking cue-reactivity is discussed in terms of an automatic, perceptual-categorization system, consistent with Tiffany's drug-use and Johnson's P300 models. Implications of ERP smoking cue-reactivity for study of tobacco and other addictions are discussed.
OBJECTIVE: Reactivity to smoking cues, shown previously by autonomic and self-report variables, was investigated in smokers and nonsmokers using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). METHODS: Average ERPs to 20 color pictures of people smoking and 20 neutral pictures depicting nonsmoking themes, randomly mixed with 4 repetitions/stimulus, were measured from 20 light-moderate smokers and 18 nonsmokers, following a stressor. Smoker status and stimulus type effects on ERPs and principal components factor scores (FS) were tested by repeated-measures ANOVAs. RESULTS: Smokers' N268 showed significant medial and midline smoking cue-reactivity (ERP to smoking-related minus neutral stimuli); while a P300-like, P412, showed significant smoking cue-reactivity over medial and left hemisphere scalp. FS analyses confirmed most of the foregoing. P412 smoking cue-reactivity was correlated with unpleasantness-pleasantness cue-reactivity but not with urge-to-smoke cue-reactivity. Nonsmokers' N268 stimulus differences were not significant, but significant P412 stimulus effects (unconfirmed by FS analyses) were found in central-to-posterior and in left parietal-temporal areas. CONCLUSIONS: Smokers' N268 is identified with a process detecting stimuli incongruent with tobacco-addicted states; and P412 smoking cue-reactivity is discussed in terms of an automatic, perceptual-categorization system, consistent with Tiffany's drug-use and Johnson's P300 models. Implications of ERP smoking cue-reactivity for study of tobacco and other addictions are discussed.
Authors: Francesco Versace; Jennifer A Minnix; Jason D Robinson; Cho Y Lam; Victoria L Brown; Paul M Cinciripini Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Andrew J Waters; Saul Shiffman; Michael A Sayette; Jean A Paty; Chad J Gwaltney; Mark H Balabanis Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Yong Cui; Francesco Versace; Jeffrey M Engelmann; Jennifer A Minnix; Jason D Robinson; Cho Y Lam; Maher Karam-Hage; Victoria L Brown; David W Wetter; John A Dani; Thomas R Kosten; Paul M Cinciripini Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: An-Li Wang; Dan Romer; Igor Elman; Bruce I Turetsky; Ruben C Gur; Daniel D Langleben Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2013-12-15 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Muhammad A Parvaz; Nelly Alia-Klein; Patricia A Woicik; Nora D Volkow; Rita Z Goldstein Journal: Rev Neurosci Date: 2011-11-25 Impact factor: 4.353
Authors: Jason D Robinson; Francesco Versace; Jeffery M Engelmann; Yong Cui; David G Gilbert; Andrew J Waters; Ellen R Gritz; Paul M Cinciripini Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 4.153