Literature DB >> 25435918

Potential utility of cancer-specific biomarkers for assessing response to hormonal treatments in metastatic prostate cancer.

Jack Schalken1, Siebren Dijkstra2, Edwina Baskin-Bey3, Inge van Oort2.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men and there is an urgent clinical need to improve its detection and treatment. The introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a biomarker for prostate cancer several decades ago represented an important step forward in our ability to diagnose this disease and offers the potential for earlier and more effective treatment. PSA measurements are now routinely conducted alongside digital rectal examination, with raised PSA levels leading to biopsy. PSA is also used to monitor disease and assess therapeutic response. However, there are some important limitations to its use, not least its lack of specificity for prostate cancer, and increased PSA screening may have resulted in overdiagnosis and overtreatment of early, low-risk prostate cancer. Therefore, there is a need for more specific and sensitive biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer and treatment response; in particular, biomarkers of response to hormonal treatments in prostate cancer and predictive biomarkers to identify who is most likely to respond to these treatments. Here we review the current utilization of PSA and data on potentially more specific and sensitive biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer: prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) and the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene. A description of the design of an ongoing study of the 6-month extended release formulation of leuprorelin acetate (Eligard(®) 45 mg) will provide preliminary data on the potential utility of these new biomarkers for detecting therapeutic response after hormonal therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PCA3; PSA; TMPRSS2-ERG; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen

Year:  2014        PMID: 25435918      PMCID: PMC4236304          DOI: 10.1177/1756287214545328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Urol        ISSN: 1756-2872


  50 in total

1.  APTIMA PCA3 molecular urine test: development of a method to aid in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jack Groskopf; Sheila M J Aubin; Ina Lim Deras; Amy Blase; Sharon Bodrug; Craig Clark; Steven Brentano; Jeannette Mathis; Jimmykim Pham; Troels Meyer; Michelle Cass; Petrea Hodge; Maria Luz Macairan; Leonard S Marks; Harry Rittenhouse
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Clinical evaluation of the PCA3 assay in guiding initial biopsy decisions.

Authors:  Alexandre de la Taille; Jacques Irani; Markus Graefen; Felix Chun; Theo de Reijke; Paul Kil; Paolo Gontero; Alain Mottaz; Alexander Haese
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Prostate cancer: send away the PSA?

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  W J Catalona; A W Partin; K M Slawin; M K Brawer; R C Flanigan; A Patel; J P Richie; J B deKernion; P C Walsh; P T Scardino; P H Lange; E N Subong; R E Parson; G H Gasior; K G Loveland; P C Southwick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Urine TMPRSS2:ERG fusion transcript integrated with PCA3 score, genotyping, and biological features are correlated to the results of prostatic biopsies in men at risk of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Cornu; Géraldine Cancel-Tassin; Christophe Egrot; Cécile Gaffory; François Haab; Olivier Cussenot
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 6.  Cancer biomarkers - current perspectives.

Authors:  Anant Narayan Bhatt; Rohit Mathur; Abdullah Farooque; Amit Verma; B S Dwarakanath
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Disease and host characteristics as predictors of time to first bone metastasis and death in men with progressive castration-resistant nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Smith; Richard Cook; Ker-Ai Lee; Joel B Nelson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  The discovery of prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  Amrith Raj Rao; Hanif G Motiwala; Omer M A Karim
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Prostate cancer genes associated with TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion and prognostic of biochemical recurrence in multiple cohorts.

Authors:  B G Barwick; M Abramovitz; M Kodani; C S Moreno; R Nam; W Tang; M Bouzyk; A Seth; B Leyland-Jones
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Radiotherapy for isolated lymph node metastases in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer after primary therapy.

Authors:  Christoph Henkenberens; Axel S Merseburger; Frank Bengel; Thorsten Derlin; Katja Hueper; Viktor Grünwald; Hans Christiansen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  NMR-based metabolomics studies of human prostate cancer tissue.

Authors:  Ana Rita Lima; Joana Pinto; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Márcia Carvalho; Paula Guedes de Pinho
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.290

Review 3.  Molecular and Functional Diagnostic Tools in Precision Oncology for Urological Malignancies.

Authors:  Vasanthakumar Sekar; Debapriya Ghosh Mehrotra; Biswanath Majumder
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-15

4.  Urine stabilization and normalization strategies favor unbiased analysis of urinary EV content.

Authors:  Riccardo Vago; Giorgia Radano; Davide Zocco; Natasa Zarovni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Are biomarkers evaluated in biopsy specimens predictive of prostate cancer aggressiveness?

Authors:  Francesca Carozzi; Lara Tamburrino; Simonetta Bisanzi; Sara Marchiani; Milena Paglierani; Simonetta Di Lollo; Emanuele Crocetti; Carlotta Buzzoni; Elena Burroni; Luana Greco; Elisabetta Baldi; Cristina Sani
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  Metabolic Phenotyping in Prostate Cancer Using Multi-Omics Approaches.

Authors:  Nuria Gómez-Cebrián; José Luis Poveda; Antonio Pineda-Lucena; Leonor Puchades-Carrasco
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.