Literature DB >> 16627561

APTIMA PCA3 molecular urine test: development of a method to aid in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Jack Groskopf1, Sheila M J Aubin, Ina Lim Deras, Amy Blase, Sharon Bodrug, Craig Clark, Steven Brentano, Jeannette Mathis, Jimmykim Pham, Troels Meyer, Michelle Cass, Petrea Hodge, Maria Luz Macairan, Leonard S Marks, Harry Rittenhouse.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) encodes a prostate-specific mRNA that has shown promise as a prostate cancer diagnostic tool. This report describes the characterization of a prototype quantitative PCA3-based test for whole urine.
METHODS: Whole-urine specimens were collected after digital rectal examination from 3 groups: men scheduled for prostate biopsy (n = 70), healthy men (<45 years of age with no known prostate cancer risk factors; n = 52), and men who had undergone radical prostatectomy (n = 21). PCA3 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) mRNAs were isolated, amplified, and quantified by use of Gen-Probe DTS400 Systems. Prostate biopsy results were correlated with the PCA3/PSA mRNA ratio, and PSA mRNA concentrations were used to normalize PCA3 signals and confirm the yield of prostate-specific RNA. Assay precision, specimen stability, and mRNA yield were also evaluated.
RESULTS: The specimen informative rate (fraction of specimens yielding sufficient RNA for analysis) was 98.2%. In this clinical research study, ROC curve analysis of prebiopsy specimens yielded an area under the curve of 0.746; sensitivity was 69% and specificity 79%. Serum PSA assay specificity was 28% for this same group. PCA3 and PSA mRNAs were undetectable in postprostatectomy specimens except for one man with recurrent prostate cancer. Assay interrun CVs were < or =12%. Both mRNAs were stable in processed urine up to 5 days at 4 degrees C and after 5 freeze-thaw cycles.
CONCLUSION: The APTIMA PCA3 assay combines simple specimen processing with precise assays and existing instruments and could add specificity to the current algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16627561     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.063289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  140 in total

1.  Twenty Years of PSA: From Prostate Antigen to Tumor Marker.

Authors:  Gabriela De Angelis; Harry G Rittenhouse; Stephen D Mikolajczyk; L Blair Shamel; Axel Semjonow
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2007

Review 2.  Molecular alterations in prostate cancer as diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Bora Gurel; Tsuyoshi Iwata; Cheryl M Koh; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; William G Nelson; Angelo M De Marzo
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 3.  The roles of microRNAs in the progression of castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Satoko Kojima; Yusuke Goto; Yukio Naya
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Urine TMPRSS2:ERG fusion transcript stratifies prostate cancer risk in men with elevated serum PSA.

Authors:  Scott A Tomlins; Sheila M J Aubin; Javed Siddiqui; Robert J Lonigro; Laurie Sefton-Miller; Siobhan Miick; Sarah Williamsen; Petrea Hodge; Jessica Meinke; Amy Blase; Yvonne Penabella; John R Day; Radhika Varambally; Bo Han; David Wood; Lei Wang; Martin G Sanda; Mark A Rubin; Daniel R Rhodes; Brent Hollenbeck; Kyoko Sakamoto; Jonathan L Silberstein; Yves Fradet; James B Amberson; Stephanie Meyers; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Harry Rittenhouse; John T Wei; Jack Groskopf; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  The influence of PSA-RNA yield on the analysis of expressed prostatic secretions (EPS) for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Christopher Whelan; Laura Crocitto; Mark Kawachi; Kevin Chan; David Smith; Timothy Wilson; Steven Smith
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.344

6.  [Optimized standards for prostate biopsy].

Authors:  B Wullich; S Füssel; R Grobholz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  ERG rearrangement metastasis patterns in locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sven Perner; Maria A Svensson; Ruhella R Hossain; John R Day; Jack Groskopf; Ryan C Slaughter; Analee R Jarleborn; Matthias D Hofer; Rainer Kuefer; Francesca Demichelis; David S Rickman; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Rational approach to implementation of prostate cancer antigen 3 into clinical care.

Authors:  Rou Wang; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Rodney L Dunn; Kirk J Wojno; John T Wei
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Risk stratification in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 10.  Urinary biomarkers for prostate cancer: a review.

Authors:  Daphne Hessels; Jack A Schalken
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.