Literature DB >> 22821767

Urine TMPRSS2:ERG fusion transcript integrated with PCA3 score, genotyping, and biological features are correlated to the results of prostatic biopsies in men at risk of prostate cancer.

Jean-Nicolas Cornu1, Géraldine Cancel-Tassin, Christophe Egrot, Cécile Gaffory, François Haab, Olivier Cussenot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Detection of fusion gene TMPRSS2:ERG transcripts in urine have been recently described in order to refine urine-based detection of prostate cancer (PCa), but data its clinical impact remain scarce. We aimed at investigating the correlation of TMPRSS2:ERG, prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), prostate specific antigen (PSA) density, genetic variants, and androgenic status with outcome and pathological findings at prostatic biopsy.
METHODS: Between 2007 and 2011, 291 patients at risk of PCa because of PSA > 3.0 ng/ml (55%) or candidate to active surveillance protocol justifying restaging biopsy management (45%) were recruited. TMPRSS2:ERG was detected by urine assay (Progensa™). PCA3-score, PSA level, bioavailable testosterone level, prostate volume, rs1447295 and rs6983267 genotypes were prospectively assessed. Univariate and multivariate analysis by logistic regression model (logit) were conducted to study the correlation of TMPRSS2:ERG status, PCA3, and PSA density with biopsy results, and Gleason score.
RESULTS: Of 291 patients, 173 had PCa and 118 had negative biopsy. PCA3 score, PSA density and TMPRSS2:ERG-score were correlated with presence of PCa (P < 0.0001, P = 0.046, and P < 0.0001, respectively). This correlation remained strong on multivariable analysis model (area under curve 0.743). PCA3 score and PSA density were significantly associated with presence of Grade 4 through multivariable analysis. PCA3 score was also correlated to the percentage of positive cores at biopsy (P = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: Integration of levels TMPRSS2:ERG transcripts in urine, with PCA3-score, androgenic status, genetic status and traditional clinical variables could significantly increase detection of high risk localized PCa.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22821767     DOI: 10.1002/pros.22563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  26 in total

Review 1.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Sophie M Bruinsma; Joseph Nicholson; Alberto Briganti; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Temporal Stability and Prognostic Biomarker Potential of the Prostate Cancer Urine miRNA Transcriptome.

Authors:  Jouhyun Jeon; Ekaterina Olkhov-Mitsel; Honglei Xie; Cindy Q Yao; Fang Zhao; Sahar Jahangiri; Carmelle Cuizon; Seville Scarcello; Renu Jeyapala; John D Watson; Michael Fraser; Jessica Ray; Kristina Commisso; Andrew Loblaw; Neil E Fleshner; Robert G Bristow; Michelle Downes; Danny Vesprini; Stanley Liu; Bharati Bapat; Paul C Boutros
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Potential utility of cancer-specific biomarkers for assessing response to hormonal treatments in metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jack Schalken; Siebren Dijkstra; Edwina Baskin-Bey; Inge van Oort
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2014-12

4.  Biopsy Core Features are Poor Predictors of Adverse Pathology in Men with Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  François Audenet; Emily A Vertosick; Samson W Fine; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Victor E Reuter; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Karim A Touijer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Current Management Strategy for Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jamil S Syed; Juan Javier-Desloges; Stephanie Tatzel; Ansh Bhagat; Kevin A Nguyen; Kevin Hwang; Sarah Kim; Preston C Sprenkle
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; H Ballentine Carter; Abbey Lepor; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Assessment of long-term outcomes associated with urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion at repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Selin Merdan; Scott A Tomlins; Christine L Barnett; Todd M Morgan; James E Montie; John T Wei; Brian T Denton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  TMPRSS2-ERG fusion transcripts expression in patients referred for prostate biopsy: combining detection in urine and needle rinse material.

Authors:  Nicolas Barry Delongchamps; Patrick Younes; Lydie Denjean; Marc Zerbib; Phuong-Nhi Bories
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  PSA and beyond: alternative prostate cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Sharanjot Saini
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 10.  The role of biomarkers in the assessment of prostate cancer risk prior to prostate biopsy: which markers matter and how should they be used?

Authors:  Marianne Schmid; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Markus Graefen; Margit Fisch; Felix K Chun; Jens Hansen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.