Literature DB >> 25435385

Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone.

A D Schwitalla1, M Abou-Emara2, T Spintig1, J Lackmann2, W D Müller3.   

Abstract

Dental implants are mostly fabricated of titanium. Potential problems associated with these implants are discussed in the literature, for example, overloading of the jawbone during mastication due to the significant difference in the elastic moduli of titanium (110 GPa) and bone (≈1-30 GPa). Therefore poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) could represent an alternative biomaterial (elastic modulus 3-4 GPa). Endolign(®) represents an implantable carbon fiber reinforced (CFR)-PEEK including parallel oriented endless carbon fibers. According to the manufacturer it has an elastic modulus of 150 GPa. PEEK compounds filled with powders show an elastic modulus around 4 GPa. The aim of the present finite element analysis was to point out the differences in the biomechanical behavior of a dental implant of Endolign(®) and a commercial powder-filled PEEK. Titanium served as control. These three materials were used for a platform-switched dental implant-abutment assembly, whereas Type 1 completely consisted of titanium, Type 2 of a powder-filled PEEK and Type 3 of Endolign(®). A force of 100 N was applied vertically and of 30° to the implant axis. All types showed a minimum safety factor regarding the yield strength of cortical bone. However, within the limits of this study the Type 2 implant showed higher stresses within the adjacent cortical bone than Type 1 and Type 3. These implant assemblies showed similar stress distributions. Endless carbon fibers give PEEK a high stability. Further investigations are necessary to evaluate whether there is a distinct amount of endless carbon fibers causing an optimal stress distribution behavior of CFR-PEEK.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endolign; Finite element analysis; PEEK; Platform-switched dental implant; Titanium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25435385     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of stress distribution in an endodontically treated tooth restored with four different post systems and two different crowns- A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Rajvi Nahar; Sunil Kumar Mishra; Ramesh Chowdhary
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-10-09

2.  Finite Element Analysis of effect of cusp inclination and occlusal contacts in PFM and PEEK implant-supported crowns on resultant stresses.

Authors:  Githanjali Manchikalapudi; Sreeramulu Basapogu
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2021-01-16

Review 3.  Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications.

Authors:  Ivan Vladislavov Panayotov; Valérie Orti; Frédéric Cuisinier; Jacques Yachouh
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Stress distribution around different abutments on titanium and CFR-PEEK implant with different prosthetic crowns under parafunctional loading: A 3D FEA study.

Authors:  Akanksha Mourya; Rajvi Nahar; Sunil Kumar Mishra; Ramesh Chowdhary
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-03-16

5.  Suitability of Secondary PEEK Telescopic Crowns on Zirconia Primary Crowns: The Influence of Fabrication Method and Taper.

Authors:  Susanne Merk; Christina Wagner; Veronika Stock; Marlis Eichberger; Patrick R Schmidlin; Malgorzata Roos; Bogna Stawarczyk
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Zirconia implants and peek restorations for the replacement of upper molars.

Authors:  José María Parmigiani-Izquierdo; María Eugenia Cabaña-Muñoz; José Joaquín Merino; Arturo Sánchez-Pérez
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-02-20

Review 7.  Finite element analysis of dental implants with validation: to what extent can we expect the model to predict biological phenomena? A literature review and proposal for classification of a validation process.

Authors:  Yuanhan Chang; Abhijit Anil Tambe; Yoshinobu Maeda; Masahiro Wada; Tomoya Gonda
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-03-08

Review 8.  PEEK with Reinforced Materials and Modifications for Dental Implant Applications.

Authors:  Fitria Rahmitasari; Yuichi Ishida; Kosuke Kurahashi; Takashi Matsuda; Megumi Watanabe; Tetsuo Ichikawa
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-15

9.  A three-dimensional finite element analysis of mechanical function for 4 removable partial denture designs with 3 framework materials: CoCr, Ti-6Al-4V alloy and PEEK.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Bochun Mao; Zhuoli Zhu; Jiayi Yu; Yuqing Lu; Qianqian Zhang; Li Yue; Haiyang Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The investigation of the stress distribution in abutment teeth for connected crowns.

Authors:  Kunihiko Mizusawa; Chiharu Shin; Daizo Okada; Reiko Ogura; Wataru Komada; Omnia Saleh; Ling Huang; Hiroyuki Miura
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.080

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.